Jump to content

Primetime Ratings: Wednesday 2/14/07


R!ck

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Wednesday February 14, 2007

Total Viewers

American Idol 28.5 million

Criminal Minds 15.4 million

CSI: NY 14.6 million

Lost 12.8 million <--------------Series Low

Bones 12.3 million

Deal or No Deal 9.6 million

Medium 8.6 million

Jericho 7.7 million

Friday Night Lights 7.4 million

George Lopez 7.2 million

Lost R 5.0 million

The Knights of Prosperity 4.8 million

Beauty and the Geek 4.2 million

One Tree Hill 2.3 million

Adults 18-49

American Idol 12.1/29

Lost 5.6/14 <---------------Series Low

CSI: NY 4.4/11

Bones 4.1/17

Criminal Minds 4.0/10

Medium 3.0/8

George Lopez 2.6/7

Deal or No Deal 2.6/6

Friday Night Lights 2.5/7

Jericho 2.1/6 (NA)

Lost R 2.1/5 (NA)

Beauty and the Geek 1.9/5

The Knights of Prosperity 1.9/5

One Tree Hill 1.1/3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

No surprise on those Lost numbers. I have watched every single episode from the beginning, and have to say that last nights episode was terrible. It was almost 100% Desman's back story, which was annoying and very confusing. The group of people I was watching it with were annoyed (avid fans), and most said that they will not be watching the show anymore. Not good.

Obviously Valentine's day takes a part of the audience away, but there's no excuse for the numbers being that low.

Bad, bad, bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sigh...

I think the timeslot has A LOT to do with LOST losing viewers. Some people will watch, just to watch when it is on at 9pm. Now you have people who are giving up on the show and its easy to because its on late when not everyone can watch. The 10'oclock thing is hurting it. Those numbers are lower than Heroes!! Forget about the show itself and the storylines, but the show is driving itself into the ground.

I hate that the show is losing all of its core characters. Is this ALL because of contract negotiations? It makes no sense because characters like Charlie have had over 3 or 4 episodes revolving around them, their psyche is part of the LOST feel and then they die and you forget all about how they were supposed to fit in to the equation. I guess that is the whole point, the writers want us to forget all the bones they have thrown at us because they don't know what it means.

Uhm, where is Desmond's wife? The show has still not addressed last season's cliffhanger! That's ridiculous. And the dropped/plot holes are too glaring. Why do we see Sun now? Last we saw her she was on the boat that was hijacked by the others. And that was where we last saw Sayid until he popped up with Locke in one of the earlier episodes.

I hate this glaring plot holes, before it was part of the fun that was LOST, now it is just annoying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sadly I knew this would happen to lost, I told myself not to watch another show that JJ Abrahms was a part of because of what he did to Alias, but I gave it a chance anyway. I really feel for the cast. An what the hell were the critics thinking praising this show and saying it was back for??? I really hope they know something we don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy