Jump to content

All Soaps: Is the lack of diversity boring you?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

If I recall, these couples were considered the "bad" couples, the ones we weren't supposed to root for. For example, wasn't Roseanne supposed to be a spoiler for Antonio/Andie and/or Cristian/Jessica? It's that old racist story in which an Old World/minority character (Antonio/Cristian) wants to "break free" of his/her backward, intolerant culture and aspires to something "better."

It's sad that a couple like Angie/Jessie on AMC would be marginalized as a "token black, politically correct, backburner couple" these days. Same-race minority couples can have just as much frontburner potential as interracial couples. Then again, it's hard to maintain minority characters on majority-white soaps if there isn't some romantic flexibility. Otherwise, they get stuck in a "ghetto," so to speak, in which they only interact with characters of their race, which was a real problem on Y&R until they started testing Malcolm/Phyllis (which was OK), Neil/Victoria (blah), and Brad/Olivia (disastrous).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yeah, I've thought of this too. Which is more of an insult to the minority community? Having a situation where the minority characters are married to each other with no flexibility or having minority characters that have interracial relationships? I think the answer is to have enough characters of different races and backgrounds, so that you can have it both ways. Then just follow the chemistry, which is something I wish soaps would do a lot more often.

I wasn't watching AMC when they tried to make the Fusion girls into SITC type characters, but I don't think they should rip off that show. Just model a character or two in the mold of independent single women who want to stay that way for awhile. One of the issues I have with daytime is the unrealistic portrayal of motherhood. At least Y&R is showing a post partum depression story (I think), which is something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I get what you mean for hte ABC soaps but the ones I listed for Sunset Beach were defiently not the "bad" couples. Ricardo/Paula were one of their premiere couples and the Antonio/Gabi/Ricardo triangle was pretty big in its last year with both pairings having rooting value

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's too bad Sunset Beach didn't survive; it was a really diverse show with a lot of potential. It's interesting how a lot of the recent NBC soaps - Santa Barbara, Sunset Beach, and Passions - all had strong Latino casts in leading roles. ABC and CBS also had their Latino "phases" back in the '90s, but only the Vegas on OLTL survived.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Going after the Latino market makes total sense. Latino's are quickly becoming the largest minority, so I think there is potential there. B&B was in a good place to capitalize on that, since the show takes place in LA, yet they wrote most of their Latino characters off. It's too bad. Now that Sally is gone and Spectra is no more :( :( Maybe it's time for another rival fashion house. Introduce a Latino family as the rivals and finally stop the incest by proxy that's been going on for years. I can dream, can't I?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ha. Yes. And that's actually a great idea...to create a Latino rival fashion house. Saundra Santiago (ex-Carmen, GL) would be brilliant going toe-to-toe with Susan Flannery, and perhaps Lindsey Hartley can join the show when PASSIONS goes off the air.

It's always been baffling to me how a fashion-based drama set in L.A. would have few LATINOS, few ASIANS, and no GAY MEN. You'd think Stephanie would have spat out at least one gay son.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

B&B created a Hispanic male designer. Then, they paired him with Kristen Forrester. Then, they gave him HIV+. Then, they had the couple adopt an HIV+ African son. Then, they wrote the family off the show.

*rolling eyes*

Their other Hispanic characters were canned recently.

I loved GENERATIONS. *sigh*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The lack of diversity is disturbing.

However, I don't want to see characters just bring characters on so they can say they have Hispanic characters or African-Americans. If they bring them on, write for them. I love seeing shows putting them in frontburner stories. That is why I was so happy when Days' Lexie and Abe finally started being used in 2000. They had been nothing but minor to supporting character for years and they finally were given meaty material. It was great.

One thing about shows like Sunset Beach, Santa Barbara, and Passions is they really tried to diversify and utilize the characters on the frontburner. Passions had families of different classes, race, etc. It was great and I applaud them for that, If only more shows would do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy