Jump to content

GH/DAYS: Kirsten Storms...


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Hahaha!

So lets hate on Annie becuase she's not worthy of your golden standards of beauty.

First, my Eileen comment was made towards Kenny, and Kenny alone. He found it as a joke, but apparently, some others did not. And you wouldn't because it wasn't meant for you. So go take your little Annie-bashing and Willow hating selves elsewhere. Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

Kirsten, first of all everyone knows i love her.

now, on days i loved her. when she firstg started was she great? nope. but she was a god actress, no ali sweeney but still good and could hold her own most of the time. i thought she did amazing in high drama moments, like the graduationa nd the breakup with shawn. also, i thought her and KB phillip had great sexual tension. esp when they went all spy games and had to strip down.

now on gh, when she started i was like wtf? why is belle black in port charles? and wtf? why did gh get rid of the amazing RR? but she grew on me. i liked maxie/jesse and loved maxie being bad and going after lucky. imo, kirsten does amazing at playing a [!@#$%^&*]y role like maxie, and i think that says a lot because she is so nice and sweet in person.

but yeah... like i said i love her so.. whatever. lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Kirsten Storms was a great cast as a child actress. She made Belle cute and likeable during her first two years on the show (I particularly loved the Brady/Belle scenes of this period). However, as soon as she was given heavy emotional material, it became apparent she didn't have the substance to make the step up. Whereas Ali Sweeney and Christie Clark made the same transition with ease, Storms just couldn't do it. Her portrayal became very whiny and artificial. Langan's obsession with Shelle made matters worse because it meant she was thrown into this sweeping adult romance before she was ready. Finally, several years of scenes opposite Jason Cook couldn't have been good for her development as an actress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

With all respect Bellcurve, Maxie's motives have nothing to do with Kirsten's acting. They are writing her with selfish motivations to get what she wants. They are writing Maxie to be bitchy. That is what Kirsten is projecting due to the writing. If Robyn was there, she'd be doing the exact same thing.....except her emotional scenes would probably come off a lot better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But that is what I meant, Ryan.

Robyn would have made Maxie's motives seem a lot more...believable. Robyn played the snarky, [!@#$%^&*]y stuff too, but she always had the vulnerability going for her. Even though Maxie, in theory, would be selfish, Robyn would still somehow make the character worth rooting for. After Liz became a sactimonious hypocrite, she was never my favorite, but I just love seeing her slap the piss out of Maxie when she gets a chance.

Kirsten is a terrible actress. She just has good scriptwriters giving her character life.

So, I'm fully aware actors have no control over the writing. I just feel Robyn would have given Maxie more depth. But that is obviously a matter of opinion.

ETA: And another thing...I hate it when I have convos with offliners who MISS Kirsten Storms as Belle. And I'm like, "Are you f***ing kidding me?!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
    • Roger's return storyline may have been silly but Roger's return was what lead to GL's last golden era.  It was the combination of Roger's return and Robert Calhoun becoming EP that got GL to finally hit it's stride after some really bad years. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run didn't reflect the quality of the show.
    • He also gave some of the best episodes, like the episodes surrounding Doug's death. The problem with Days was that Ron had a horrible vision from he top. I don't feel the same for MVJ and nothing that has happened in all these months suggests she doesn't have a handle on the show. Now if it becomes an issue I'll acknowledge it, but I'm not seeing it so far.
    • Jean Hackney was awful and that lead to Ben's exit story which sucked. I liked Ben/Val together. Val's love for Ben was that of a grown woman moving on with her life and Ben's love for Val made him willingly decide to raise another man's children as his own.
    • It wasn't just a GL thing, it was an 80s thing. Opulent party scenes on soaps were very big back then. Even in regular episodes where people are just going to dinner they're dressed up like they're going to see royalty.
    • Just started the May 27 episode and first thing I see is that Willow got an ugly haircut since hte last time i watched   I dont have the context for how everthing went down but I know its all Lulu's fault which make her a bish for what she did to Gio
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy