Jump to content

Is Passions being cancelled?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

This is not good news at all for PASSIONS!!

With the 4th hour of the TODAY SHOW confirmed now, it seems like PASSIONS will most likely not make it.

However, the article DOES sounds like NBC does not WANT to cancel PASSIONS and is trying to convince the affiliates to give them an hour back, without getting an hour back in return.

Who knows, perhaps the affiliates MIGHT give them the hour back on condition of solid ratings, which might buy PASSIONS a year or half a year.

Oh well lets hope for the best, lets hope NBC does not have to give the affiliates the 2PM timeslot!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Congratulations, in your quest to bash "Passions" you neglected to place blame on the RIGHFTUL shoulders of THE NATIONAL BROADCASTING COMPANY.

NBC is to blame.

Why?

The net GAVE "Days" the chance it needed to rebound in the ratings -- first by JER's second run, and then by Hogan.

In order to be fair and TRULY give "Passions" the shot of reaching its potential, the net MUST fire James E. Reilly to see just how awesome and profitable the show can be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

At first I thought you were crazy when I read this post, but then I read that last line and realized, "disgruntled AW fan...makes sense."

"Passions" does NOT have just one good actor.

Let's see...

Lindsay Korman Hartley

Juliet Mills

Ben Masters

Kim Johnston Ulrich

Liza Huber

(Guy who plays Spike -- he does it really well)

(Girl who plays Simone)

Emily Harper

Andrea Evans

And I'm sure there are many, many more.

Let's bash "Passions," if we must, for REAL reasons, and NOT falsehoods like bad acting. Also, who knows if it's the acting or the writing? Some actors, like Evans, try even when their material isn't the best, and some actors just don't. They find it hard to reach motivation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ummm...where did I bash Passions? :huh: I said JER writing was bad. I didnt say the show sucked. Learn how to read! :P:lol: And NBC is not at fault. If Passions ratings were higher it wouldnt be in trouble. If you want to blame someone for the cancellation of Passions look at its head writer. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

First of all, do NOT call me crazy because my opinion differs from yours. And for the record, I am not just a disgruntled AW fan. I just know mediocrity when I see it. Passions never was and never will be a soap. It is an acid trip that makes Showgirls look like Shakespeare. It's about damn time that the network brass is cutting its losses. The show has been at the bottom of ratings for EIGHT years without any hope of eclipsing other more worthy shows. I say shoot it like the lame dog it is and put it out of its misery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sorry if I mischaracterized your comments, Soapsuds. I'm literally posting on SON, eating dinner and watching "7th Heaven" at the same time, lol. I'm a multi-tasker. Anyway, I still disagree that a PROPOSED (not official, thank God) cancellation of "Passions" is all JER's fault. The net MUST fire JER and renew the show another year or I'll blame the net. FOREVER. And yes, my quest to bring NBC to its knees through prayer will begin. And sorry, but in a battle of God vs. NBC, that cancel-happy net won't win. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sorry, I'm in a bad mood ...omg! Ruthie just said she has condoms on "7th Heaven"!!! WHOA -- okay, sorry. Yeah, I've just been in a bad mood and have been seeing red over the "Passions" cancellation rumors. It makes me livid. Anyway, the thing some people don't understand about the show is that it's not supposed to be a traditional soap; it's a "soap send-up" or parody. IT has traditional soap elements but it also has quirky cartoon violence and campy entertainment. And sorry, but the reason the show was renewed for so many years was that its ratings were, by contemporary standards, GOOD. It consistently scored the 2's that "Sunset Beach" could never get on such a continuous basis. The show has been the bottom of ratings, yes (and it consistently topped "Port Charles" for a time, there, so it wasn't always bottom of the ratings), but that didn't mean it had less-than-respectable ratings for so long.

As for the last sentence, I say give "passions" the chance that "Days" was given. Fire the writer, renew, and give it a REAL shot of success. JER is clearly burnt out. Either that or he has a vendetta and, like I said, wants bragging rights for the fall of the entire daytime soap opera genre. Either way, he SHOULDN'T be writing this show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree NBC would love to have it both ways. There isn't a chance in hell affiliates will give NBC a chance to improve "Passions" ratings. Every affiliate program director would tell NBC to shove it. They played the game, NBC airs three hours of "Today" and two hours of soap operas, affilates get the rest. In the cut throat world of broadcast television, in a climate when network affiliates don't just complete with each other but the 100's of cable channels every timeslot an affiliate gets is PRECIOUS TIME FOR $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ there is nothing more precious to an affiliate than a timeslot, the article made that clear. With that said, I see it very hard for "Passions" to get renewed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One thing you and I CAN agree on is that JERk is a hack and that he shouldn't have free reign over Hee Haw let alone Passions :lol: I apologize for getting a little angry in my last post. Obviously this is an issue that is divisive and not every argument or statement will be sunshine and lollipops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Why does everyone keep saying that NBC should just fire JER? It cannot happen. He created the show. NBC can cancel the show, but they can't fire JER from his own product. People cannot blame NBC for not firing Reilly instead of just cancelling it. He's seen to it that he can never be fired from his own show.

So, either he straightens his act up, or they'll be forced to cancel. Sounds to me like they gave him the warning MONTHS ago... he didn't listen. What else can the network do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • This, plus they nixed their overnight set crew during the COVID era and never brought them back.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • I did some research because I had a similar question. (also, I don't want to poop on your joke which was amusing, but it sent me down a rabbit hole) A Reddit user who works at TeleVision City (where Y&R is filmed) estimated it takes 45 minutes to set up or reconstruct an already built set.  However, according to union rules, it takes at least seven crew members (not counting lighting and sound installation).  As always, the real cost is the labor, not the task.   Y&R uses robotic cameras, so there is only a skeleton crew on set.  Most of their crew budget goes to production assistants, who cannot move sets.  So, they would need to hire a crew every time they wanted to put up or take down a set (for two days) as well as a lighting and sound design installation.  Which is obviously very different from how production worked when money was more freely spent (and good for the unions for keeping the workplace safe). So, filming a single day in Lauren and Michael's living room could cost as much as they spend on two actors salaries for an entire year.
    • I knew Giovanni Mazza was talented but damn that kid is a star in the making. 
    • The Nurses' Ball has always been cringey, fast forward material for me, but especially during the Frank era. The musical numbers and audience reactions are unwatchable.  So many of the conflicts on this show feel phony and manufactured. Probably no better instance is the Gio - Dante crap. Gio's whole story is inorganic, plot driven, no stakes, fake conflict; giving people lame drama just to give them drama, a prime example of GH under Frank.
    • What is the reason why soaps can’t use whatever sets they want? How exactly does it cost money..? I’m sure they still have Michael and Lauren’s house, why can’t they just put it up and shoot it when needed lol 
    • I'm binging last week and I still find it so odd how different the show feels. Before I felt like each episode felt so long but the show is gliding by now. I'm on Thursday and it's crazy how real the characters feel. It doesn't feel like Days of Our Lives because I'm so used to everything being slapstick. It's definitely nice seeing layers to the characters now. I'm beginning to feel really confident about the coming months when the new headwriters can introduce their own stories.
    • And, Dani's focus, whoa, when she deigns to really pay attention, her focus is laser sharp. And, Chelsea is a natural attention seeking target for Dani. She is so much more mother than I realized before.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I did enjoy the Dani/Chelsea scene! It’s nice to see Dani show a little more nuance, and I agree I do buy her and Chelsea as mother/daugher. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy