December 31, 200618 yr Member Soaps stars are not allowed to show their parts in Playboy. It is a contract violation.I believe James Hyde mentioned why he couldn't go any further in his spread in greater detail, something about NBC wouldn't let him and they control, as other networks do, their stars promotion. Well, that is an outrage. That is just shocking and frankly, quite saddening. It could only help the soaps -- not to mention their loyal fans who want nothing more than to see them in ALL their glory.
December 31, 200618 yr Member Robert Kelker Kelly also posed when he was Bo on Days. I still remember the magazine because Keith Richards from the Stones was in it. I have never looked at another Playgirl again
December 31, 200618 yr Author Member LOL! JSF - I gotta call you out on how you think it's so degrading and disgusting for WOMEN to go nude in Playboy...but you're all rooting for the MEN to take it all off in Playgirl With that being said, yeah I was so sad and disappointed when I got the Cameron Mathison Playgirl edition and saw nothing but chest lol
December 31, 200618 yr Member yeah its pretty common knowledge. I thought most fans that watch ABCD or GH knew this. I was shocked when I first saw her bc the casting news for Livvie on PC said that she had done playboy and she looked so young at the time Edited December 31, 200618 yr by Cheap21
December 31, 200618 yr Member I've seen the pics. I was watching an old episode of The Girls Next Door yesterday and they beat out Kelly for the Nov. 2005 cover. I WAS shocked when I ran into Kelly McCarty (Beth, PSNS) porn one random night.
December 31, 200618 yr Member I personally don't see a problem with a woman posing for Playboy...first off Hugh Hefner says that his magazine is done in good taste, (unlike other men entertainment magazines, who may like to have who is posing pose in a vulgar manner). If they don't have a problem with shedding their clothes and posing, then I don't see why it's such a big deal in saying that they are degrading themselves; I don't find it degrading...Child nudity, taking pictures of folks posing vulgarly with animals, now that's degrading; however, I don't find posing for Playboy that at way at all. There have been a lot more actresses that have posed for Playboy, and actors who have posed for Playgirl...but I don't look down on them or make judgements about them...If I had the opportunity (and the figure), I'd pose....but that's just me Edited December 31, 200618 yr by SweetNYGal33
December 31, 200618 yr Member I had a subscription to Playboy for many years and the magazine is really not porn. They show some boobs, but you get that in movies. The majority of it is articles just like any other magazine and very good articles I might add. Penthouse? Thats another story!
December 31, 200618 yr Member yep, heard about this awhile ago, in fact, i thought it was pretty common knowledge. As some of you mentioned, Kelly has been pretty open about it and isn't ashamed at all. Playboy is really nothing at all, compared to all the others out there, and I don't see anything wrong with it, but then again, that's just my opinion. Edited December 31, 200618 yr by mateo22
December 31, 200618 yr Member LOL! JSF - I gotta call you out on how you think it's so degrading and disgusting for WOMEN to go nude in Playboy...but you're all rooting for the MEN to take it all off in Playgirl With that being said, yeah I was so sad and disappointed when I got the Cameron Mathison Playgirl edition and saw nothing but chest lol It's sad but true, alwaysAMC. Unfortunately, there is a double standard when it comes to these things. It's like the virgin/whore paradigms. Besides, I saw the Kelly and Daphne spreads and really, who in their right mind wants to see THAT?!!! Frankly, I was offended. The Windsor Harmon spreads and Vic Webster spreads were well done. James Hyde's, while hot, were shameful since NBC gagged him from taking more off. '
December 31, 200618 yr Member --> QUOTE(Chris B @ Dec 31 2006, 02:43 PM) I had a subscription to Playboy for many years and the magazine is really not porn. They show some boobs, but you get that in movies. The majority of it is articles just like any other magazine and very good articles I might add. Penthouse? Thats another story! Exactly. JSF, chill out. It's not like they showed the pink, like Penthouse or(God forbid) Hustler. And Kelly Monaco in Playboy is not like a Jeff Griggs(ex-Jude, DAYS) thing. Imagine THAT shock. LOL. I'm still looking for free Tony Sinatra downloads just to see what the fuss is about.
January 1, 200718 yr Member --><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Chris B @ Dec 31 2006, 02:43 PM) </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->I had a subscription to Playboy for many years and the magazine is really not porn. They show some boobs, but you get that in movies. The majority of it is articles just like any other magazine and very good articles I might add. Penthouse? Thats another story! Exactly. JSF, chill out. It's not like they showed the pink, like Penthouse or(God forbid) Hustler. And Kelly Monaco in Playboy is not like a Jeff Griggs(ex-Jude, DAYS) thing. Imagine THAT shock. LOL. I'm still looking for free Tony Sinatra downloads just to see what the fuss is about. I didn't understand what you meant, bellcurve, so I decided to do a little research. The magazines don't seem all that different to me. Also, the only reason that Monaco's spread didn't show "the pink" is because, well, hmm...how do I say this...Monaco's pictures feature a raging forest, and, of the Penthouse pictures I researched, those women's land had been cleared as far as the eye could see. The bottom line is that both magazines exist for ONE purpose. In other words, these women know what they're getting into. Why millions of men will see their picture and why their image in a magazine won't be pristine, shall we say, after a few minutes from that magazine's delivery. I guess I don't like the punchline or the end product. That, in the end, these women are 'taking a bath,' so to speak, for MILLIONS of men.
January 1, 200718 yr Member --><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Chris B @ Dec 31 2006, 02:43 PM) </div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->I had a subscription to Playboy for many years and the magazine is really not porn. They show some boobs, but you get that in movies. The majority of it is articles just like any other magazine and very good articles I might add. Penthouse? Thats another story! Exactly. JSF, chill out. It's not like they showed the pink, like Penthouse or(God forbid) Hustler. And Kelly Monaco in Playboy is not like a Jeff Griggs(ex-Jude, DAYS) thing. Imagine THAT shock. LOL. I'm still looking for free Tony Sinatra downloads just to see what the fuss is about. Also, about Sinatra -- not that hard to find. Looking at it now. So not shocking. Same thing as Monaco really. Oh, uh oh. Uh oh uh oh oh. Wow, I see what you mean. Okay. Shutting up now.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.