Jump to content

In The Zone w/ Ryan Chandler and Na'Vell in 2006


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 590
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Due to the technical issues we were having yesterday, we will finish the blog previews. Juniorz1 is scheduled to join us to give previews for his Santa Barbara blog.

Topics for tonight include:

- Part II of the SONBC Blog Preview w/ Juniorz1

- DAYS & *shock* Passions talk

- Some GH Previews going into January

- How Day 1 of my "Passions" Experiment went

- Speculation regarding future OLTL storylines.

- A preview of one or two songs scheduled to appear on Katherine McPhee's new album in January 2007.

- Open Discussion

Show begins at 10PM EST

Call In: 347-996-5978

Homepage: In the Zone

The live link for the show will be added once the show starts. I hope to see you there :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Archive Link for Tuesday's Show

Oh.....how do I describe the show last night. There are no words LOL

I spazzed like hell last night, and now I feel bad, so I do apologize for that

Aside from the "arguing" Ryan and I had ;), Greg joined the show to discuss his Santa Barbara blog, Ryan talked about his first day of the Passions experiment, Jen called in w/ her GH news, and heard a few snippets of songs from Katherine McPhee.

BTW, after my phone disconnected, it couldn't be live-streamed, but it still recorded the show. So, if you want to hear what happened afterwards, you can hear it in full in the archive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yay! The upload thing is working today!

Topics for tonight include:

- The momentum that DAYS is building with their string of great episodes.

- The firing of Judi Evans & Rhassan Orange from DAYS

- A preview of Katherine McPhee's song "Dangerous".

- The lack up creative identity of ABC Daytime.

- Speculation on SOW's blind item.

- Y&R's storm storyline.

- Open Discussion

Show begins at 10PM EST

Call In: 347-996-5978

Homepage: In the Zone

The live link for the show will be added once the show starts. I hope to see you there :)

Live Link For Tonight's Show

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
    • shoot...he said in that Locher room with Krista. I think he met her before that---she was doing Broadway and they had mutual friends or an agent maybe?
    • Yes. And I assume he met Mary Ellen Stuart at GL.
    • That's an odd coincidence. Yeah, Roger would turn anything he could to his advantage. At the time, he's just taking the pictures to bank leverage over Reva, Billy or the Lewises.  I'm kinda squeamish about 1986 episodes myself. I'd love to hear the original version of Ross/Vanessa/Dinah, but the Cain story is bad, and I don't want Billy and Vanessa to break up.
    • Eeek. I didn't know this either! I will say, though, even though they skimmed over a lot of Roger's past, I will give them props for not trying to turn him into a hero. Yeah, I was hoping we would get more 1986 episodes than were available on YT before, but now I'm wondering if I really want to see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy