Jump to content

William H. Macy Calls Out Linsday Lohan


R!ck

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Zap2it

Macy Calls Out Lohan, Disrespectful Actors

Says Lohan's 'charming,' but her actions are 'inexcusable'

By Daniel Fienberg

At 55, William H. Macy has been working in film and television for more than 25 years and in the theater for even longer, so when the consummate professional called out Lindsay Lohan on Thursday (Aug. 24), it was striking.

Macy was speaking to reporters about his vocal turn in the computer animated "Everyone's Hero" when the subject turned innocently to upcoming projects. Macy, one of the business' most prolific actors, has a number of films in the can, including Emilio Estevez's "Bobby," a period piece that co-stars oodles of A-list performers including Lohan.

The question was a simple one: Did you enjoy working with Lindsay because we know she also co-starred with [Macy's wife] Felicity Huffman in "Georgia Rule"?

Long pause.

Very long.

"She's uh... She's completely charming," Macy replied, giving the question thought. "Felicity says she's a huge talent, that girl can act."

Another pause.

"But you can't show up late. It's very, very disrespectful."

Lohan's professionalism was never directly raised by any reporter, but it became an issue earlier this summer when James Robinson, head of "Georgia Rule" producer Morgan Creek, sent the "Mean Girls" star a letter criticizing her repeated on-set lateness. The letter, in which Robinson accused Lohan's behavior of leading to hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages, made it onto the Internet. But Macy wasn't done.

"I think what an actor has to realize, when you show up an hour late, 150 people have been scrambling to cover for you and there is not an apology big enough in the world to have to make 150 people scramble," Macy continued, with obvious passion and concern. "It's inexcusable. It's nothing but disrespect. And Lindsay Lohan is not the only one. A lot of actors show up late as if they're God's gift to the film. It's inexcusable, and they should have their asses kicked."

But that wasn't a problem on "Bobby," right?

"She was pretty late."

Macy, who became a familiar face well into his 40s, thinks it's a case of actors experiencing too much fame too quickly.

"I worry about these young kids -- 15, 18, 20 years old -- who in the span of one year become millionaires and powerhouses. It's too much power for a kid that age to handle and when these young actors are spiraling out of control and taking drugs and drinking too much, I think their managers and their agents are morally bound and perhaps legally bound to do something about it."

It must be noted here that although Robinson's letter to Lohan specifically mentioned her "all-night heavy partying," Macy was speaking of general young actors in the previous quote and not specifically about the "Herbie: Fully Loaded" star. Asked for his solution to these raging actors, though, Macy was quick to answer.

"Fire 'em."

More and more it's seeming like even the most powerful of celebrities aren't immune to public criticism. Earlier this week, Viacom chief Sumner Redstone showed no hesitation to tell the press that Tom Cruise's off-screen behavior was directly related to the end of his production deal with Paramount. Macy, though, refused to rise to the bait when Cruise's name was mentioned.

"He's not late."

"Everyone's Hero" opens on Friday, Sept. 15. "Bobby" will play at next month's Toronto International Film Festival.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I LOVE William H. Macy and I agree with him about these young actors. Most of them aren't even that talented.

If they had asked me, I would have said Lindsay is a gross-looking skank who needs a good kick in the ass and a cheeseburger to boot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

WTG William H Macy! I think Lindsay is very talented, but agree with Roman when he said she's going to end up in a "Where Are They Now" type of show if she doesn't get her act together soon. :mellow:

After I saw those pictures on Perez of Lindsay looking all coked up in her room, I believe that more than ever. And shame on her mother for encouraging her and not trying to stop her behavior!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Jason, just let me say that it was not my intent to any way impugn any of your data  or research. I'm very sorry if it came out that way. Obviously the person I got these 4 November episodes from has mislabeled files, multiples, which I was certainly unaware of.  When I am editing it is all about what I see & hear. Later, I find time for greater reflection.  Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why.  If you find you are no longer interested in the edit, that is fine. I have no ego in this. I did it only to share it.
    • I feel like Vernon and Anita need to not be hypocrites and try and take the heat off Bill in this case. It's clear that the family used him as a fixer and especially knowing he helped with Martin's situation, they need to either be quiet or support him. BTW...with Vanessa being in the hospital for food poisoning, am I the only one who thought Shanice was gonna say she's pregnant or had an STD? The only reason I say STD is because she hasn't had any memorable sex partners, but I definitely don't believe she just had food poisoning.
    • Yeah, I mean I know that the name still pertains. I just laugh at it not now being called Arizona Dust, but, I admit it simply does not have the same ring to it. Above, that is interesting that Arizona had already come up before the crisis. 
    • Leslie and her family are from Chicago? Anita's background also includes being a former Chi-Town native? Might they connect this and go somewhere with it?
    • Honestly who's to say Leslie even birthed Eva, I mean she's a liar, I wouldn't believe a word she says about Eva being Ted's(or hers)
    •   1. 11/1/83 cast/set list:  

      Please register in order to view this content

          The "11/2/83" video you posted of Ruth Buzzi's scenes includes Roman and Hope in them, meaning the video you posted is actually 11/1/83, since Roman and Hope aren't in 11/2/83.   2. The video you posted of "11/2/83" has scenes with Roman and Hope. As you can see from my cast/set list, Roman and Hope are not in the 11/2/83 episode (see above note):   4573...11/2/83: Cast: Mickey, Julie, Doug, Maggie, Neil, Don, Marie, Alex, Liz, Andre as Tony, Gwen, Chris, Eugene, Sandy, Letitia, Charlene, Mrs. Whiting, Wanda/Guard, Dave, Delia, Saleslady # 1, Saleslady # 2, Figure in Dark, Raven/animal, Cats/animals, Birds/animals.   2.  11/3/83 :My video collection starts with 11/4/83. so I don't have the 11/1/83 or 11/3/83 video, but in addition to the cast/set list for 11/3/83, here is also the parking clearance call sheet for that day, showing Ruth was not only in the cast/set list but did work that day:     They even had hired the animal trainer and all the animals for the day, so It's sort of a certainty that her scenes were not cut that day, or it would have been a big waste of the budget. 3. As for 11/7/83, I just fast-forwarded through that whole episode myself. Letitia is in it from start to finish. It's her big final episode where she is killed. She starts the episode saying "Eugene, are you there?" In the next act, Marlena shows up and meets Letitia's lion. Later in the episode, Letitia is killed by "Eugene" (the Salem Slasher in a Eugene mask).   So, as we can see from your own post, the 11/2/83 date you have listed on that video is incorrect, since Hope and Roman are in that video but not in the 11/2/83 episode.It seems the dates you have on all your early November 1983 episodes are incorrect.   When you post videos and suggest that my data is incorrect, do you not first compare who is in the scenes and see if that matches who is in the episode? You didn't do that with the "11/2/83" episode, which based on Roman and Hope being in it means that is actually 11/1/83. Best to do something like that first before suggesting my data and research is incorrect.
    • Within the Dupree family, I predict Vernon/Anita will be conflicted about what to do about Bill and his role in the whole Ted/Silk Press Sheila situation... especially since Bill knows where the particular bone about Martin is buried. Dani, Chelsea, and Naomi's reactions to what Bill possibly did isn't hard to guess.. but Hayley's reactions will be interesting to hear.  Especially given her recent pregnancy scare.. she might not be so much on Bill's side, or she'll totally surprise us and be totally on Bill's side.   Either way, I think Martin's secret will be the main focus in May sweeps.. with the fall out of the Eva secret playing out in the background... while the Joey/Vanessa/Doug thing continues to boil/develop.
    • Hotel was The Love Boat on land but a little soapier. I will forever maintain that Hotel was a time slot hit. I don't believe that 1983/84 Hotel was a better show than Knots Landing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy