Jump to content

August 7-11, 2006


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Monday Rating

1. Y&R 4.2

2. B&B 3.3

3. DAYS 2.8

4. AMC 2.5

4. ATWT 2.5

4. GH 2.5

4. OLTL 2.5

8. GL 2.2

9. PSNS 1.5

Tuesday Rating

1. Y&R 4.2

2. B&B 2.9

3. DAYS 2.8

4. GH 2.5

5. AMC 2.4

6. ATWT 2.3

6. OLTL 2.3

8. GL 2.2

9. PSNS 1.6

Wednesday Rating

1. Y&R 4.5

2. B&B 3.2

3. ATWT 2.6

3. GH 2.6

5. DAYS 2.5

6. AMC 2.4

7. OLTL 2.3

8. GL 2.1

9. PSNS 1.5

Thursday Rating

1. Y&R 4.3

2. B&B 3.1

3. AMC 2.6

4. ATWT 2.5

4. DAYS 2.5

6. OLTL 2.4

7. GH 2.4

8. GL 2.1

9. PSNS 1.7

Friday Rating

1. Y&R 4.4

2. B&B 3.3

3. DAYS 2.5

3. AMC 2.5

5. ATWT 2.4

5. GH 2.4

7. OLTL 2.3

8. GL 2.1

9. PSNS 1.3

Monday Total Viewers

1. Y&R 5,497,000

2. B&B 4,392,000

3. DAYS 3,761,000

4. GH 3,235,000

5. OLTL 3,212,000

6. AMC 3,210,000

6. ATWT 3,210,000

8. GL 2,898,000

9. PSNS 2,074,000

Tuesday Total Viewers

1. Y&R 5,592,000

2. B&B 3,789,000

3. DAYS 3,573,000

4. GH 3,139,000

5. ATWT 3,084,000

6. AMC 3,068,000

7. OLTL 3,015,000

8. GL 2,871,000

9. PSNS 2,102,000

Wednesday Total Viewers

1. Y&R 6,004,000

2. B&B 4,367,000

3. ATWT 3,621,000

4. GH 3,346,000

5. DAYS 3,305,000

6. AMC 3,147,000

7. GL 3,124,000

8. OLTL 2,989,000

9. PSNS 2,037,000

Thursday Total Viewers

1. Y&R 5,733,000

2. B&B 4,042,000

3. ATWT 3,333,000

4. AMC 3,290,000

5. DAYS 3,286,000

6. GL 3,036,000

7. GH 3,026,000

8. OLTL 3,003,000

9. PSNS 2,111,000

Friday Total Viewers

1. Y&R 5,845,000

2. B&B 4,343,000

3. ATWT 3,305,000

4. DAYS 3,261,000

5. AMC 3,242,000

6. GH 3,148,000

7. OLTL 2,933,000

8. GL 2,793,000

9. PSNS 1,651,000

I'm pretty sure this is a typo -- 3.3 maybe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Passions deserves to fall fall fall in ratings as long as they insist on keeping Whitney stuck with Chad (who audiences were told was her brother for the first 6 years of the show). That is a lot to ask of fans. You tease fans with how great life can be for Whitney and her new man.. you tease fans with the prospect of Whitney being free from the thug with no ambition.. you show Whitney falling in love with someone new, fantasizing about the guy.. then bamb! It is confirmed that the loser is her brother and she gets turned on by the prospect of bedding him. A tsunami comes along and she's spread eagle for him in his dirty little studio. What young female in her right mind would say oooh ooh I want to see more?

Consider it karma for the show. It has never rebounded from the ridiculous tsunami crap that ruined most of the stories. It will go down to 1.0 by the end of the year. Deservingly so. :D You can only spit on fans' faces so many times. It doesn't matter how well the other stories are doing. As long as Whitney-Chad live, the show will continue dying. It's karma.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Is it too cruel for me to hope DAYS ratings really suck after Matt Ashford/Missy Reeves leave the show?

I notice finally some acknowledgement today that the exodus of J&J fans will put a dent into the ratings, and John/Marlena aren't quite the saviors that other people on this board have claimed. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm sure this has been explained countless times so I apologize but can someone explain to me the impact of soapnet on the ABC ratings? If one included the soapnet viewers in the comparison ABC would not be so bad off...correct?

I read that last week soapnet had its highest ratings ever.

I realize a drop is a drop and has nothing to do with soapnet but in terms of standings, the ABC soaps would be higher if soapnet was taken into consideration. Do we have any idea how much higher?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That describes me. I am an 80s Days refugee that just returned to the show after 14 years because of S & K. They are pretty much the only thing I do not fast forward. Bo, Hope and Marlena weren't even on the show during the years I watched (or only on briefly). Jack and Jennifer were in the very early stages towards the end of my viewership--he still had the stigma of Kayla's rape and she was still basically in teen stories, so none of them were enticements to me to return. There are a lot of people I recognize only from magazines or whatever, and a lot of people (mainly the teens) that I have no idea who they are at all and don't feel compelled to take time to figure them out. One thing that's struck me as a cheesy gimmick since I've been back is how frequently this show does flashbacks of stuff that happened a show or few shows earlier. Overkill. But, overall, storywise, I am not compelled to watch anything beyond S & K (maybe that will change with the writer change). Same thing happened with GH...longtime viewer, on and off...off 2-3 years, back on for the Scorpios' return but, otherwise, the same stuff that bored me then is still boring me now. But since nobody's ever tracked me or anything, my viewership is apparently neither here nor there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GH

Monday: 2.5/3,235,000

Tuesday: 2.5/3,139,000

Wednesday: 2.6/3,346,000

Thursday: 2.4/3,026,000

Friday: 2.4/3,148,000

GL

Monday: 2.2/2,898,000

Tuesday: 2.2/2,871,000

Wednesday: 2.1/3,124,000

Thursday: 2.1/3,036,000

Friday: 2.1/2,793,000

GL had 10,000 more viewers than GH on Thursday! WTG!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Since I already did the math and all ;)

MONDAY, AUGUST 7

1.(1) Y&R: Monday, 8/7: 4.2/5,497,000 (-64,000)

2.(2) B&B: Monday, 8/7: 3.3/4,392,000 (+589,000)

3.(3) DAYS: Monday, 8/7: 2.8/3,761,000 (+263,000)

4.(7) ATWT: Monday, 8/7: 2.5/3,262,000 (+265,000)

5.(6) GH: Monday, 8/7: 2.5/3,235,000 (+172,000)

6.(5) OLTL: Monday, 8/7: 2.5/3,212,000 (+54,000)

7.(4) AMC: Monday, 8/7: 2.5/3,210,000 (-153,000)

8.(8) GL: Monday, 8/7: 2.2/2,898,000 (+370,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Monday, 8/7: 1.5/2,074,000 (-123,000)

TUESDAY, AUGUST 8

1.(1) Y&R: Tuesday, 8/8: 4.2/5,592,000 (+95,000)

2.(2) B&B: Tuesday, 8/8: 2.9/3,789,000 (-603,000)

3.(3) DAYS: Tuesday, 8/8: 2.8/3,573,000 (-188,000)

4.(5) GH: Tuesday, 8/8: 2.5/3,139,000 (-96,000)

5.(4) ATWT: Tuesday, 8/8: 2.3/3,084,000 (-178,000)

6.(7) AMC: Tuesday, 8/8: 2.4/3,068,000 (-142,000)

7.(6) OLTL: Tuesday, 8/8: 2.3/3,015,000 (-197,000)

8.(8) GL: Tuesday, 8/8: 2.2/2,871,000 (-27,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Tuesday, 8/8: 1.6/2,102,000 (+28,000)

WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 9

1.(1) Y&R: Wednesday, 8/9: 4.5/6,004,000 (+412,000)

2.(2) B&B: Wednesday, 8/9: 3.2/4,367,000 (+578,000)

3.(5) ATWT: Wednesday, 8/9: 2.6/3,621,000 (+537,000)

4.(4) GH: Wednesday, 8/9: 2.6/3,346,000 (+207,000)

5.(3) DAYS: Wednesday, 8/9: 2.5/3,305,000 (-268,000)

6.(6) AMC: Wednesday, 8/9: 2.4/3,147,000 (+79,000)

7.(8) GL: Wednesday, 8/9: 2.1/3,124,000 (+253,000)

8.(7) OLTL: Wednesday, 8/9: 2.3/2,989,000 (-26,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Wednesday, 8/9: 1.5/2,037,000 (-65,000)

THURSDAY, AUGUST 10

1.(1) Y&R: Thursday, 8/10: 4.3/5,733,000 (-271,000)

2.(2) B&B: Thursday, 8/10: 3.1/4,042,000 (-325,000)

3.(3) ATWT: Thursday, 8/10: 2.5/3,333,000 (-288,000)

4.(6) AMC: Thursday, 8/10: 2.6/3,290,000 (+143,000)

5.(5) DAYS: Thursday, 8/10: 2.5/3,286,000 (-19,000)

6.(7) GL: Thursday, 8/10: 2.1/3,036,000 (-88,000)

7.(4) GH: Thursday, 8/10: 2.4/3,026,000 (-320,000)

8.(8) OLTL: Thursday, 8/10: 2.4/3,003,000 (+14,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Thursday, 8/10: 1.7/2,111,000 (+74,000)

FRIDAY, AUGUST 11

1.(1) Y&R: Friday, 8/11: 4.4/5,845,000 (+112,000)

2.(2) B&B: Friday, 8/11: 3.3/4,343,000 (+301,000)

3.(3) ATWT: Friday, 8/11: 2.4/3,305,000 (-28,000)

4.(5) DAYS: Friday, 8/11: 2.5/3,261,000 (-25,000)

5.(4) AMC: Friday, 8/11: 2.5/3,242,000 (-48,000)

6.(7) GH: Friday, 8/11: 2.4/3,148,000 (+122,000)

7.(8) OLTL: Friday, 8/11: 2.3/2,933,000 (-70,000)

8.(6) GL: Friday, 8/11: 2.1/2,793,000 (-243,000)

9.(9) PSNS: Friday, 8/11: 1.3/1,651,000 (-460,000)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Of the so-called "contract" cast members, I'd venture to say these are recurring: Bryton James, Camryn Grimes, and (possibly) Michael Graziadei.  I've suspected since 2018 that Kate Linder and Christian LeBlanc are recurring.  And I believe we all know Miss Ordway is, because she said so. lol.  
    • Dante blaming Gio instead of his dweeb son and the other dweeb was just ridiculous. Gio's paternity story is going in circles with no reveal. I've already started fast forwarding Drew and his stupid ho Willow's story. Kristina's story is beyond dumb with no great payoff.
    • Sarah (with the English accent) isn't just some random character.  Sarah was once the housekeeper for Eliot Dorn and Margo Huntington.  One of the following 2 scenarios happened a few months ago: (1):  One night, while Margo wasn't at home, and while Oscar the Doorman wasn't at his post, a burglar sneaked into the private elevator, rode up to the penthouse, stole several thousand dollars worth of Margo's valuable diamonds and pearls, and tied-up Eliot Dorn and Sarah the Housekeeper, ensuring that Eliot and Sarah couldn't pursue the burglar back down to the lobby or phone the police to apprehend the burglar. OR --  (2): Eliot Dorn was SLEEPING with Sarah the Housekeeper, and the two of them conspired to steal Margo's jewelry and went on a lavish spending spree and then tied THEMSELVES up to make it look as though a burglary had occurred in the penthouse. Margo Dorn currently believes Scenario #1 occurred, and she's rather annoyed that the "incompetent police" haven't located her stolen jewels yet.  Eliot and Sarah know that Scenario #2 actually occurred.  When Sarah stopped by the Unicorn and saw Eliot kissing Raven Swift, Sarah snidely said, "Oh! This must be Mrs. Dorn!  Nice to meet you, Mrs. Dorn!" Sarah knew good & damn well Raven isn't "Mrs. Dorn" because Sarah worked for Margo Dorn on a daily basis for many months.  That was Sarah's not-so-subtle way of announcing, "I'll be paying a visit to District Attorney Logan Swift and letting him know that his wife is sleeping with you, and I'll be paying a visit to WMON to let Margo Huntington know that you're sleeping with Mrs. Swift!"  lol.     
    • The AMC hate came from Jamey Giddens/DC and their industry friends, IMO. For whatever reason I always felt they targeted the show, and it was wrong. AMC ratings were decent and even went up under Pratt (Yet, he was fired). The ratings were also good under Broderick and lowered out after her interim.  There was no reason to be upset with the show other than it being slow. They literally played it safe and did the best they could in 2010 and 2011. 
    • I have very detailed synopses of all 1976 storylines for the soaps from the Daytime Serial Newsletter. Please let me know if you are interested in a particular show and I will post it in the appropriate thread. As I stated they are very detailed, so I don't want to clutter up threads if posters are not interested.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Surely we (and Billy Flynn) are not going to be saddled with a character named Aristotle Dumas? This isn't 1970's Edge of Night.
    • What annoys me a little bit about the "day players" is they sound a bit too "Brooklyn-ish" sometimes.  Obviously, the show was taped in New York City, and the actors are all New York actors, but Monticello is supposed to be located in Illinois or Ohio.  Occasionally, they grab actors and actresses for small roles who have VERY distinct New York accents, which contrasts sharply with the main cast, none of whom have noticeable accents (except for our dashing European gigolo, Eliot Dorn, of course).  The heavy Brooklyn accent works fine if the character is a bookie, or the owner of a pawn shop, or a guy who's selling stolen guns on the street corner.  But when it's a steadily recurring character -- such as the first Mrs. Goodman, who worked for Miles and Nicole -- it's pretty jarring to me sometimes.  And you'll see it often -- such as an "under-five" character who witnesses a car accident, or a character who witnesses a shooting, or the occasional desk clerk, or waiter.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy