Jump to content

The "foreign soaps" topic


Huntress

Recommended Posts

  • Members

PMSL - no Brookside was axed back in 2003, before it was axed, for about a year it use to air at weekends only if i recall rightly, and the last episode was at night time, about 10pm i think, i did upload a clip from the last ever episode...

This clip is a bit gorey, viewers discression is advised lol

Its some of the residents hanging the local drug dealer.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icNeSQl5WCY

Clip coming into, from break, also feature Hollyoaks late night promo

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=24...94516&hl=en

Another clip

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2...50593&hl=en

Here is closing credits from 2001

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icNeSQl5WCY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 620
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

"Brookside" was cancelled in 2003, if I remember correctly.

And regarding "Emmerdale," I should have mentioned that I would like to see the 70s episodes of it. I found a site with a transcript and caps from the pilot and it really looks good. It reminds me a lot of "Ryan's Hope."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

i checked out this weeks first 2 eps of Eastenders. I cannot believe how haggered Wendy Richard looks now. Especially with that short hair.

The somita drinking story and the father moving near his abandoned son story attracted me the most. I loved Jo Joyner on Doctor Who last year. Lynda Moss should have become a companion,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, I've read a lot about that. It was a Dutch version of Ryan's Hope based on the original story bible by Claire Labine and Paul Avila Mayer, although it seems like most of the original characters are no longer on the show. The show seems like a twilight zone version of RH with stuff happening that would never have occured on the original show, hee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here is the vide of the explosion from BROOKSIDE, from 1998.

They did actually explode this for real, and had obviouly one take to it in.

Its not the first explosion, this is the second explosion that happens.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdYPTRYvzvY

Here is audio only of the first explosion and the end credits...

http://media.putfile.com/Brookside

Also this from Neighbours, clips from the 2005 finale

http://media.putfile.com/Neighbours-Finale89

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

can't get much cheaper than the original <_<

getting back to the topic of the foreign soaps, I can't believe I forgot to get into the Australian soaps.

I LOVE Home and Away! I've been watching it on and off (sadly, mostly off due to availability issues) since 2001. All of 2006 has been capped and uploaded online and I've seen every episode this year ... loving it. Such a sense of family that I can't find on any other show.

Neighbours ... not a fan. It comes off as far too preachy and afterschool specialish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I only really get that from Neighbours when they do something really in your face and social issue related. But H&A has been guilty of the same thing (not so much these days because they don't really bother tackling issues anymore).

But in defence of Neighbours, the whole gay thing was handled brilliantly over a period of months on that show with lesbian kisses included. After Lana accepted she was a lesbian, they didn't just drop the story or turn it into an afternoon special. It evolved into a complex kind of love triangle.

When H&A tackled the same issue...pretentious bollocks ensued. It was a two episode guest stint that wreaked of afternoon special and they openly admitted to shying away from a gay kiss or anything that controversial.

I think my main problem with H&A is that (these days at least) they take themselves so ridiculously seriously. At least Neighbours makes occasional light of the OTT storylines such as Paul falling off a cliff and losing his leg or Rob the psycho twin or the Lassiter's explosion.

As far as dialogue is concerned I don't find there to be much between them seeing as they share freelance dialogue writers for both shows. I enjoy both of them but I've watched Neighbours continuously for 20 years which is why I think I prefer the community feel and friendships of that show.

ETA: Here's a preview of next week with Rob deciding to crash his parents' wedding with a gun

http://youtube.com/watch?v=XM7vuSFFEow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like Neighbours, for me its a family show. It doesnt go ott like every other week, i watch at Australian pace, and the phole physco Robert is excellent.

I do have to say the promos from Network can be misleading, very misleading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ain't that the truth. Neighbours used to do it during the Karl/Izzy/Susan storyline making you think Susan had found out the truth about the baby when in fact she was just shocked that Sindi has used the last of the orange juice.

H&A does it too, particularly with the stalker stuff. "5 people will DIE!" Which means one major character, three extras and someone's dog.

The Neighbours preview I've posted is on the mark though. There is a shooting at the wedding (which I assumed was Paul but now I wonder if Katya gets injured too). I know it's not Gail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes i know the shooting happens, from listening closley i have a feeling Katya will jump in the way, or accidently get shot.

"Come on Kat, say something to me" - i assume Katya is shot.

Even the the promos are misleading, they do have that appeal to make sure you do come back for the next episode.

Where are you James F? Im in UK, so i download the eps from a certain website lol

I personally think that no one will actually get shot. Its like when the promo said Robert was literally going to kill Katya, but she slipped on the cliff, and he helped her, they showed a police car turning up - but that police car was infact them turning up to Stingray's car, when he had been drinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • As always, really interesting to get your impressions! I was only watching sporadically during this period (whereas I was transfixed during the Marian storyline), but if I remember correctly 1996 was a pretty rough transitional year. It came at a period where P&G was playing musical chairs with its executive producers--ATWT was hit especially hard by this. The current executive producer, Michael Laibson, is out in November 1996, replaced by Paul Rauch, who stays for nearly 6 years. While Rauch has a few really bad ideas that cause long-term damage to the show, those don't really kick in until 1999, and his first couple of years are very strong. So once you get to 1997, you should see the show rebound significantly. 
    • Haha love a little drunk posting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m up to April 01, 1996. I think I’m starting to understand what many have said.. things are different. I miss the community vibe of Springfield, when you had people working at the hectic newspaper, the choatic diner, the rich were coming in for coffee, or the TV network was abuzz about the latest scandal. Things have become a little more tunneled into their own storylines. Right now, for me anyway, there isn’t a strong desire to see what happens next, ever since the Brent/Marian story ended. It was a darker, more suspenseful storyline that really got me intrigued and waiting to see what happens next, while everything else was just a nice view of midwestern families living their dramatic lives. And I love that too, when the characters and storytelling is strong, but right now, some things are a little stale. In these last 5 weeks, we had two bigger events: Nick and Susan’s wedding:  it was sweet, but I really found it weird they played music over their vows instead of being able to hear them. Then, they leave town immediately after and for good? We really didn’t get a ton of time with them - one minute Susan is in a hospital bed, post-coma, celebrating the new year, and now she’s married and gone. I’m having a hard time with the revolving door of characters since my early ’95 watch. This year we’ve lost so many characters, gained so many characters, and to what end? Henry’s funeral:  this was so sad, considering the real actor passed. I’m curious what other fans thought about the funeral. Granted, when an actor passes, you don’t have much time to plan ahead, so you need to insert it into whatever storylines are happening at the time.  But sadly, this funeral happened when everyone was hating each other. Vanessa was upset with Matt because the Amanda secret came out and he kept it from her. Quint showed up, with his very young affair no less, which made both Nola and J upset. Amanda was there which upset both Blake and Ross. Roger insisted he give a speech which upset everyone. Vanessa was mad at Quint for bringing his young girlfriend, and then Dinah was so upset about her grandfather, which was emotional, but everyone is currently at odds with Dinah. The flashbacks were effective, and the most emotional scene was Vanessa’s breakdown when reading Henry’s letter to her.  Otherwise, it was a pretty hateful funeral, which felt icky. Otherwise, my quick pros and cons currently happening… Pros: Alex and Hawk are great and funny. He gets under her skin and it’s hilarious to watch her react, but she needs him. They were in LA trying to get dirt on Amanda’s former life and Hawk was living it up with young gorgeous women and all the spending money at his disposal.  Generally, the Amanda and her secret storyline is interesting and I really like the actress. Alex vs. Amanda is entertaining. Tina came onto the scene around the time Nadine died, but she’s been given a backstory which is interesting to me now. She’s a prostitute, who means well, and is trying to take care of her daughter, Dahlia. She grew up with Frank, who has a soft spot for her. Marcus, in a new storyline he desperately needed away from Dinah and his dad, has taken a strong liking to Dahlia. She sings well and he plays saxophone well, so their music is endearing. Sadly, Tina got involved in a robbery gone-bad, where they held up a Spaulding board of directors meeting. She flees, but Frank catches her outside and is forced to arrest her, while Cleary (she’s back!) arrests the main bad guy involved and saves the Spaulding family. I’m curious to see where this one goes, but curious, was Tina actually on the show before this or is she a brand new character? Cons: The Dinah/Hart/Roger storyline is pretty stale now. I need something new. Lucy and Alan-Michael are barely on since Brent left, which is sad. You spend an entire year on a storyline that builds their relationship, brings strife and wedges, and now that they’re finally able to be together in love with no obstacles, you never show them? I want to see them happy! Oh and Lucy and Bridget/David haven't had a scene since Marian tried to get 'a room at the boarding house, which is weird because we haven't seen Bridget react to Lucy being alive. I don't even know if Lucy even lives at the boarding house or with AM, but it's sad pretending like Lucy/Bridget/David were never close friends. Reva/Josh, which is hogging airtime, is a serious whiplash. One week Josh loves her, she hates him; the next week, she loves him, he hates her. He’s always lying to Annie, but now he’s marrying her again, the second wedding in 4 months. I’m also very tired of Marah, her angst over everything, and their overwhelming concern over her. As much as I don’t like Buzz, it is funny watching Reva work at the diner, but I’ll never side with Alan so watching him have feelings about Reva/Buzz or Reva/Josh does nothing for me. Finally, the other small B storylines are only on like once a week which isn’t enough:  Gilly/Griffin/Viviane, Michelle/J, Blake/Ross/Rick, Rick/Abby, Holly/Fletcher and the baby. Something that just popped up out of the blue is David Grant leaving Springfield out of nowhere. He professed his love to Bridget, who turned him down, so he decides to leave when Griffin gives him a job opportunity. Sadly, another character written out for many new characters being introduced. Makes me wonder who is making these calls - the producers, the network, the writers, the fans?
    • OH. The AMC/OLTL Crossover with helicopter, down in the woods, 2 very pregnant, both give birth, only one baby lives. We are on the same page!!!
    • Backtracking because BTG has been distracting me from keeping up with GH. Why is Carly always involved with a paternity lie? Lulu is Dante's (wife? if Im correct) so she has the right to tell him about his son. If anything, she's in a better place to reveal paternity drama than Robin was. As for Robin...I'm conflicted about whether it was HER place to tell AJ he was Michael's dad. Being with a man who's pretending to be someone else's baby daddy is wild. Dante was snoring blaming everyone  but Rocco, however he was right about Jason. A convo isn't enough, neither is trying to be your son's friend. Adolescents need a disciplinarian. At least Lulu made Rocco and Danny scrub the house. 
    • May 2025: Stephanie Sloane interviews Kirsten Storms about all of Maxie's romances in the past 20 years: https://www.swooon.com/gallery/general-hospital-maxie-romances-spinelli-johnny-nathan-kirsten-storms/
    • I saw a new BTG promo during Watson tonight (Sunday May 11).   I don't remember what I saw (and I wouldn't say here on the nonspoiler thread anyhow). I know only that it was different from the "next on BTG" preview at the end of Friday's episode. If anyone catches the new promo, please post it on the spoiler thread.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy