3 minutes ago, dragonflies said:

Is it showing up?

It's a blank space on my side.

Dang it, it was a tweet but won't show up

 

 

1 hour ago, dragonflies said:

 

it didn't display here but I was able to determine from the source code that it was this:


A viewer posted an episode clip, and then Sean Kanan asked about it:

https://x.com/seankanan/status/1983405069816213612
Sean Kanan @seankanan
Let me know what you think about the deepening connection between Deacon and Taylor.

Here is the video Sean Kanan asked about:
 

Taylor crosses professional lines with Deacon. #BoldAndBeautiful pic.twitter.com/8ORRqx8A7a

— 𝒾𝓈𝓃𝓉𝒹𝒶𝓋𝑒𝑜𝓃𝑒 (@IsntDaveOne) October 28, 2025

 

Edited October 30Oct 30 by janea4old

Yes thanks, how'd you do that when nothing was there lol 

33 minutes ago, dragonflies said:

Yes thanks, how'd you do that when nothing was there lol 

I clicked "Quote" to your blank post, then once the blank post appeared in the posting screen, I clicked the word "source" at the top left of the posting screen.  That showed me the original source code of your post -- which included the URL of SK's tweet.

Edited October 30Oct 30 by janea4old

8 minutes ago, janea4old said:

I clicked "Quote" to your blank post, then once the blank post appeared in the posting screen, I clicked the word "source" at the top left of the posting screen.  That showed me the original source code of your post -- which included the URL of SK's tweet.

I would never have thought to do this. Great thinking! I love how there are so many smart people in this forum! 

Wow Thanks Jane!

 

and Damn Scott Clifton having to call out someone on Twitter spreading lies

 

 

1 minute ago, dragonflies said:

Wow Thanks Jane!

 

and Damn Scott Clifton having to call out someone on Twitter spreading lies

 

 

OMG THANK GOD that JMW expressed that opinion. THANK F-CKING GOD. 

41 minutes ago, dragonflies said:

Wow Thanks Jane!

 

and Damn Scott Clifton having to call out someone on Twitter spreading lies

 

 

Interesting, thank you for sharing this. Good on Scott for sticking up for her. There's nothing wrong with JMW using her considerable leverage to veto stories she doesn't want to do. It happens all the time in the creative industry.

This isn't exactly a shock. Keeping Steffy out of love triangles for coming up on 5 years obviously wasn't Bell's idea. This probably explains why Sheila lasted so long, and likely a factor in Luna's turn to the dark side. Steffy needs something to do.

Glad JMW spoke up about the Liam recycled nonsense.

The only thing interesting about yesterday's show was seeing Deke and how much the sets have improved.

On one hand I don't disagree at all with ending the Steffy/Liam/Hope-triangle, whatever the reason.

On the other hand I think it's a bit funny how so many thinks it's ok for some actors to make demands as long as those demands align with what they want themselves. But in other instances when actors (allegedly) use their influence behind the scenes (Eric Braeden, Maurice Bernard, Tony Geary) it's frowned upon. 

11 minutes ago, I Am A Swede said:

On one hand I don't disagree at all with ending the Steffy/Liam/Hope-triangle, whatever the reason.

On the other hand I think it's a bit funny how so many thinks it's ok for some actors to make demands as long as those demands align with what they want themselves. But in other instances when actors (allegedly) use their influence behind the scenes (Eric Braeden, Maurice Bernard, Tony Geary) it's frowned upon. 

Only speaking for myself but I have no problem with any performer stating their preference and using their influence. The shows don't have to oblige their desires. If the actors don't play ball, they show can write out the character or recast the part. Just as the actors can leave at the end of their contracts if they want to.

That said, I'd prefer Steffy in sexier storylines again.

38 minutes ago, I Am A Swede said:

On one hand I don't disagree at all with ending the Steffy/Liam/Hope-triangle, whatever the reason.

On the other hand I think it's a bit funny how so many thinks it's ok for some actors to make demands as long as those demands align with what they want themselves. But in other instances when actors (allegedly) use their influence behind the scenes (Eric Braeden, Maurice Bernard, Tony Geary) it's frowned upon. 

I agree that there's this double standard. I myself... have no issue with an actor speaking his mind... BUT... I would never expect it or demand it from them. That's my stance. I respect when they do... and I respect when they don't. To me the problem comes when people FEEL like the actor OWES them to say something or oppose storyline and etc. That to me is just... absurd.

Beth is too stinking cute, Jordyn is a great little actress.

Deacon does NOT look happy reuniting with Sheila lol!

If Taylor hadn't set boundaries he would have totally had her bent over her desk in no time 🤭

I'm actually all in for her and Deacon, wow!! 

If Deacon does Sheila dirty with Taylee, will Brooke decide to be friends with Sheila again? You know, the enemy of my enemy....

Liam avoids the gallows, but now Brad is signed the marriage death certificate for both Liam and Hope? 

Considering the horroscape of CBS primetime ratings - especially in the demos, we should be grateful that B&B is doing well even if I'm disappointed with the stories. Paramount is cutting lots of jobs + will likely axe more scripted shows than usual ... so stream B&B, BTG & Y&R - those views are absolutely counted - unlike linear ratings.