Jump to content

All: The Quiet Ones


Recommended Posts

  • Members

In the classic GH thread Kim Zimmer came up, and how when she didn’t go over the top she was capable of incredible things. Which made me think of all the non-bombastic soap folks who used to bring it, were popular, but didn’t lose a more grounded nature to their work.

First to come to mind was Julia Barr on AMC. She was good at everything I saw her do- romance, journalism stories, deep family heartbreak, snark, rivalries, comedy. When I first started watching, Brooke had a through line of dignity that just shone through, and I rooted for her. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Julia Bart’s Brooke is a good choice for this.

I would also have to go with ATWT’s Kathryn Hays as Kim as well as CZ as Barbara at least before 2000. 
 

Tricia Cast as Nina on Y&R is another “quiet one” yet always gives stellar performances even when she had been off the show for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I also thought of both of them shortly after my post! Tricia Cast and Hays, both great. Bryggman’s John Dixon too, even in scenes with Hubbard chewing the stage up he came across as genuine and grounded and equal to her.

Hays had that same kind of city gal weariness in her reactions to nonsense that Julia Barr served on AMC. I think the show made a huge mistake by not centering her more in its last decade.

 

Edited by titan1978
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ronn Moss. 

Just kidding.

Susan Flannery could give fire and make the whole room tremble with her roar... but she was also sooo good at the demure, quiet moments. She has turned some of Bradley's worst scripts into gold by just... taking the less is more approach!

.

Please register in order to view this content

I hope I am understanding the topic completely. I am taking it that you mean actors who didn't overact or go into camp territory. Who kept the moments as real as possible. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm less than halfway through the available episodes of "The Doctors" but I think I would add Jim Pritchett, at least up to what I've seen of his Matt Powers so far. Even when Matt got angry or frustrated, there was a level of restraint and dignity. I mean, I guess it came with the character; had he been playing Nick Bellini, he might have been the bombastic one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For me she falls into the category of excellent actors that started going over the top at some point and just stayed there. The show did her no favors. But the Susan Flannery of Bill Bell’s B&B and what i have seen on DAYS is as you describe and incredible. But the version of her last few years often went over the top to me, a caricature of her former glory. But I am also not a good judge because I don’t watch B&B regularly, never have. But I have watched quite a few episodes on their YouTube account of the earlier period and she is incredible, she can be so warm and then also quite cold and calculating, but not hysterical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Off the top of my head Kimberlin Brown I think is considered one of these. Sheila’s evilness/craziness to me is never OTT or scenery chewing, it’s always just the right amount where she makes her point by still being threatening. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think she's ever truly gone over the top. My opinion only. In comparison to all the others in the show, she kept it normal and realistic till the very end. At least I would not describe it as over the top. But I see and understand what you mean and refer to. I would just use a different word in my own commentary. I would say that at some point it seemed like she didn't care as much. The scripts were so, so bad... she was made to yell at Brooke - you whore, you slut, you prostitute every single month... so at one point it felt like the venom was turning into repetitiveness and just... boredom. Just the fact that Brooke started laughing at her insults in the last seasons... is telling. Stephanie stopped having her threatening and powerful presence - she became nothing more than a guard dog for Ridge and his children. They also made her more brutal and inhuman like (arranging a strange man to come in Brooke's house, giving him a key, which is basically accomplice to RAPE). They did give her some of her own storylines... her father's abuse... her mother passing, her cancer... even Pam... but still... the biggest portion of the material was her telling Brooke how she is a ho. It could have worked if it was done more sporadically.

And ever since they made Stephanie to be some kind of... lying ex-slut herself with the 2001 rewrite of Massimo being Ridge's father (incredibly wrong rewrite if you ask me... and made only to serve Brooke and give Ridge a new brother who Brooke can sleep with again)... the whole... high and mighty Matrona-persona just... flopped. Brooke started telling her that she doesn't have a moral high ground anymore and in a way she didn't. And Stephanie yelling at Brooke how disgusting she is... was not hitting the same way. STILL, these two women gave the show a sense of purpose, of continuity, of familiarity even. We loved to see Brooke and Stephanie at it. Of course nothing compares to the original war circa 1987 to 1993. Nothing. There were glimpses of powerful moments (2005 was a great one with Stephanie's heart attack)... but... nothing was ever the same. We all know why. Bradley Bell turned the show into a badly written Jerry Springer episode. 

So I would just say that... there were moments where Susan was not giving her usual 100 percent and I felt it. Even when uttering an insult, it was not the expression of real hate that we used to see. The energy was not there all the time. But she was STILL turning it on regularly when she had to and I will repeat myself -  tranformed sh-t to gold many many times. The show really breathed its last breath with her death.  

Just this last scene... is a testament to that. Susan... giving a quiet, yet powerful performance in her last minutes of a 25 year old role. 

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I remember at the time of the Nursery Rhyme Stalker storyline she gave some hilarious interviews about it and how she approached it. You can tell she cared very much about being grounded despite the ridiculous nature of what she was given, and had a sense of humor about it and didn’t allow herself to take it too seriously just be seen as a “serious actress.” 

Also, I can’t forge Maeve Kinkead whose quiet strength always spoke loudly. 
 

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A masterwork in less is more approach. No raised voices. No maniacal facial expressions. No over the top dialogue. Cold as arctic ice, words cutting to the bone, more threatening than anything you can imagine. The power of Beverlee McKinsey. 

Please register in order to view this content

Killing... with a smile. 

Please register in order to view this content

@Contessa Donatella

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, even in her takedown of Roger, she never went for over the top dramatics or histrionics. Very rare jewel Bev was. 
 

This scene between her and Zimmer is also great to revisit, just what contrasting but equally compelling actresses both are:

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maeve Kinkead, Guiding Light. When we discussed this in the GL thread, someone described it perfectly--Maeve had the cold, internal seethe down pat. While others (coughcough) would've relied on screaming crying jags, Vanessa would shiv you with an icy stare and a few well-chosen words.

Ditto....

 

Others:

Maureen Garret

Lenore Kasdorf

Cindy Pickett

Bev McKinsey

Lisa Brown

Kathryn Hays

Marie Masters

Maura West

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Days of our Lives S60E204 – Thursday, June 5, 2025 Okay, today’s episode was kind of boring. It was nice seeing Jack and Jen back, but they wasted an entire episode on Jen chatting with Julie - one scene would’ve been enough. Also, why didn’t Jack and Jen go comfort Marlena? And wouldn’t a flashback with Jack, Jen, and John have been great? Maybe something from the Cruise of Deception era? Bottom line - it feels like once John’s memorial is over and the returning fan favorites leave Salem… the show’s going to be dull again.
    • Everything with Elon and Trump is a stunt. If people, and the sycophantic press, are talking about their "feud," they are not talking about Republican plans to gut Medicare, Medicaid, and the ACA. 
    • I can't fully remember, but I don't think they tried to get Beth Chamberlin back. I think Laibson/McTavish likely saw Beth as old news and wanted to move Philip on; either that or have her return only when Philip was closely tied to a new woman. Thanks as always for these recaps. I think I had stopped watching around this time and mostly kept up by reading in the soap magazines. Bridget's degradation was horrible to watch, as the character had grown so much over the years and was clearly regressed just to be a foil for a "hot" couple viewers had zero investment in. 
    • Having the majority of the cast on those low numbers is no way to tell story. And just 2 dayplayers for the month. So sad for the #1 soap.  
    • I believe it was. And this is actually one of the cases where I wouldn’t mind some dumb soap opera bringing back from the dead. They gave Mishael, Amanda, with all of Hilary’s connections but none of the personality except for fleeting moments. Hilary absolutely should’ve just left town. They decided to kill her and the baby. Just baffling,
    • That was Mal Young right? He thought a tragic death was a better option than crafting a story where Hilary leaves town. Was it a case of punishing someone who wants to leave? And then they have to jump through hoops to bring the actress back.
    • Ooo @TaoboiI will say I just watched Amanda give it to Abby and I loved it. Honestly just made me miss Hilary more. I will never understand or get over that decision to kill her off. Also call me crazy but I could definitely see the Damian actor playing NuTed on BTG. Very much still enjoying the Lily attraction.
    • I rewatched these episodes---they broke my heart. Somehow, Nola had seen Vanessa leave the hospital, and follows her home, and Maeve just lets out this primal scream---chills went down my spine. And knowing the history between them---never quite liking the other and always getting on each other's nerves (to put it mildly)---makes it a much richer to have them put it all aside in the moment and be family to each other. I've never seen/heard what Maeve thought of the story itself, but she did want a break, so it's not like she was fired and then brought back. Yes, Vanessa could be this stubborn and unwilling to ask for help. She'd pretty much always been an "I can do this on my own" type of woman, although when she first came to town, she would still run to Henry. But after she met Billy, she stopped relying on her father. It's part of the reason she (briefly) got addicted to pills after Bill's birth---she was determined to take care of him all by herself and became obsessed with the idea she was the only one who could. Of course, nothing before to this extreme. I should say, there's no way (IMO) they could've told this story---Vanessa letting her loved ones thinking she'd died---if her father Henry had still been alive. She never would've been able to do that to him. And it does chafe that she's letting Bill believe it, when her mantra had been all about protecting him since the day he was born. I honestly don't recall what I thought about it at the time. But now I'm thrilled she's free of Matt at least. LOL.
    • I had no idea Peter Reckell was 70. He doesn’t look or feel it and I guess I thought Bo and Hope were closer in age than 9 years. Wow even the new writers had to have Jack praise Leo. Melissa Reeves continues to slip back in effortlessly as Jennifer. I like Ari and Holly being old friends. Holly learning about John’s death reminded me of how John used to call her Nikki if my memory is serving me right. Doug who happily sleeps in high school Holly’s room shirtless and in his underwear is now asking about birth years. How old is he anyway?    The Cat and Chad romance is insulting. 
    • Her husband is Marty Levy. Chocolate Fortunes (her company) was started in 1987.  So that explains the mystery of 'Whatever happened to Pam Peters?' She had been running a successful business for decades.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy