Jump to content

ALL: Popular Actors playing Unpopular Characters


dragonflies

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 148
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I wonder a lot about what influenced the changes in her character. (Brittany was never an amnesiac -- she was deaf and mute and had believed that both Catlin (whom she had known as Josh) and their baby Evan had died until Peter somehow tracked her down in order to prevent Sally from marrying Catlin.) She was introduced not as a scheming villain but as a stubborn and deprived woman. That lasted during a strike and a prolonged period without a head writer until after Mary Page Keller was replaced as Sally by Taylor Miller. Was it audience feedback or just a new HW that caused Brittany to start transparently lying and scheming to break up Catlin's marriage? That was the Brittany who entrapped Peter into marrying her, and it wasn't until Margaret DePriest came in and brought Reginald into the picture that Peter became abusive to her. Was that because the audience wanted to see Brittany punished (gross!), or was it just in order to turn Brittany into a victim so that she could be rewarded by being reunited with Catlin after Sally was killed off?

 

Edited by Xanthe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought it might have been done to help set up the whole gimmick with viewers voting for whether or not she should get off for shooting Peter. 

Given that Sharon and Thomas were both already leaving (presumably), I'm not sure why they needed such a laborious setup for her shooting Peter anyway - wasn't it something about how he frightened a horse, and she shot him on reflex? I can't remember. I'm probably wrong. 

I'm sure someone enjoyed the Love material under DePriest, as the ratings went up, but anything I've tried to sit through has made me very uncomfortable and I just can't even watch. John Considine was so badly miscast and poorly directed, Marcus Smythe was not good as a full heel, all the women were victims...on and on and on.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

All I know, and I do know it because I watched the clip & also gave the link to Sharon Rose Gabet who was delighted with it since it confirmed what Brittany had always maintained. She shot him in self-defense. But the trial did not include video, of course, and she was unfairly found guilty. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I believe Thomas Ian Griffith intended to leave at the end of his contract since he and Mary Page Keller wanted to go out to California. He was on the show for 3 years. 

I seem to recall that Gabet was released from her contract early because she was so miserable. She was on from mid-March 1985 to early January 1987, so not quite 2 years. Based on the AWHP synopses, as early as August 1986 Brittany had a gun to protect herself from Peter. She shot him in mid-November. Did the show really have a plan for her exit in January and drag it out over so many months when Gabet so badly wanted to leave? Or did they have a different vision of the abuse leading to [attempted] murder that they had to throw out the window and rejig?

According to the AWHP, this is how the verdict worked:

I wish we had one of the advertisements for reference and knew the timing of when those went out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She did leave early but I'm not at all sure it was because she was miserable. I recall that her husband became involved. She was very pregnant & the story called for Peter to "menace her" & it was felt that the actor was going overboard & that it was too physically menacing so they let her go, early. This was after her husband spoke with them at the studio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you for all the extra information. I know I probably took this thread off course. I will just say the info about how the show treated Sharon when she was pregnant makes that story even more disgusting to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

DePriest really ended the Sally & Catlin story horribly.  Instead of killing Sally she should have had her find out that Catlin got Brittany pregnant and left town with Kevin. Brittany could then have been written as getting her strength back and leaving Peter and starting a new life outside of Bay City. Sharon Gabet deserved to end her run with her character having some dignity.

Edited by Efulton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This might be a cheat because it's primetime, but Rena Sofer as Jack Bauer's sister-in-law on season 6 of 24 was despised by fans. Not that Sofer deserves any blame for the failure. That season also wasted powerhouses Regina King and Powers Boothe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Or Megan is shot by mobsters as retaliation for Dave's unpaid gambling debts.
    • Finland seemed such an odd choice for a location shoot. ATWT went to Greece and later Spain while GL had Tenerife and there were others in that timeframe. But Finland not being a known tourist destination or offering the tropical/sunny atmosphere usually associated with location shoots seems off brand. Maybe they were negotiating a deal with a tourist association and it fell through.
    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy