Jump to content

B&B: December 2024 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 321
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

They are just making Brooke look good sorta of... and that she wanted to help pooor Ridge... before catching him kissing Taylor probably, when she'll embrace the revenge mode. It's just Bradley Bell doesn't know how to write and it comes off so incredibly fake and stupid.

But the turn is coming, know that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think what kind of annoys me the most, is that Ridge could have at least told Steffy and Taylor Brooke initially was the one who told him about Carter and Hope taking over, but again heaven forbid Brooke looks good in any light when it comes to them. 
 

sigh….i think I’m gonna be done with this show after the end of the year….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Carter is a hot mess. He's too dumb to run Forrester.

I have no words for the Brooke and Ridge mess.

Zende who didn't recognize Luna was wasted is smarter than Carter.

Please register in order to view this content

Yes, this soap is a trippin mess!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And how sad for Taylee, it's not Ridge's love for her or her ill chakra that is going to make him go run to her again. It's because he has nowhere to go and feels "betrayed" by Brooke. The same old pathetic excuse and situation. It must be so hard being second best. Any woman with dignity and self-respect will refuse to have anything to do with a man in this situation. Will not believe him if he says he loves her. But we all know that Bradley Bell chooses the lowest of the low for Taylor, so I'm not gonna be surprised when she receives him with open arms. Her 5 minutes with him will begin.

Time is ticking and as soon as Brooke finds them together, kissing, making out, healing Taylee's chakra, whatever, then her empathetic plan to save poor old pig Ridge and bring him his company back will turn into poison and desire for revenge. IF Bradley Bell doesn't fu-ck that up too. It has potential, but I'm not getting overly excited in a show where nothing sticks and nothing matters in 6 months time. 

We'll see. I'm cautiously optimistic that this drivel can rise up to 5/10. 

 

Edited by Maxim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And the way Steffy was acting like Brooke as CEO is soooo wrong. Sweetheart, you were still in you father's testicles when Brooke was ruling Forrester with an iron stiletto. Sit your amateur, spoiled, entitled Marone ass down... and sh-t up. Your contribution, compared to Brooke's in the company is like comparing a little rock you found on the ground... and Jupiter. Sit down and go babysit your idiotic husband who has trouble connecting sentences.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So Ridge is in bed with Taylor a little more than 24 hours after storming out of Brooke's house. How predictable. And Taylor told him to Love her. Ew, you waited years for THIS, Taylor? Where did your dignity go... Or yes... I forgot... You haven't had pride and self-respect in decades. Can these two be even more pathetic. A man on the rebound and a second-best woman, begging for scraps. Yikes. As I predicted, Brooke is about to get a huge wakeup call when she finds them naked in the bedroom.  

Haha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Why are these two seemingly intelligent women continuing to do this to themselves? It makes both of them look absolutely pathetic. And Ridge comes off like a disgusting pig.  I have to wonder if Brad Bell actually thinks this is good writing? If he does he's completely delusional and should seriously consider seeking some professional help. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What bothers me is that in 2024 Bold still doesn't have a leading gay character... when it's a show based in LA and... about fashion. Let me correct myself. DOESN'T HAVE A LEADING GAY CHARACTER. PERIOD. LA and Fashion are just adding to the absurdity of this fact.

Gay characters/people are all around the world. Not just in Fashion or LA. We are everywhere. And we deserve to be seen, heard, represented... and for the audience to watch people like us on their screens. Not to mention how many gay people are fans of this show and promoting it by just keeping the conversation about it online - alive. I really don't know... a straight person who watches Bold, actually. And the irony is that... we don't even have 1 character like us... on the show.

Back to the fashion aspect of it... it is ludicrous. In what reality is the fashion world in LA anything close to this chauvinist cis straight male-oriented rich boy club that it is on BOLD? I mean... just look at the greats... Look at Christian Dior... Look at John Galliano, look at Alexander McQueen, look at Yves Saint Laurent. Look at Mugler even... I can go on and on and on. ALL OF THEM WERE gay. No! In Bradley Bell's reality we have RIDGE AND ERIC. That's all. 

And in BOLD world... these chauvinist pigs are still acting like women are second-best to men... they judge them by another set of standards and morals. Just the other week... a cis straight man... calling Hope a worthless slut and nasty little bitch...  because she is not acting like he wants her to act and not bowing down to him. And...  THESE were words spoken by the show's leading male. Not the antagonist or some recurring character. (Not that that would not make me cringe too) No. This is what Bradley is making his lead male say. 

 ... 

I have nothing else do add. People can do their math and combine 2 and 2. What this is.  

Edited by Maxim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Wasn't there talk of them bringing back Rita as Gus' mother at one point? Or something?
    • I think they are a part of the same family, although Carla was never really scheming for the same reasons, and once her double life was exposed, she stopped. 
    • Rachel/Ada, Mona/Erica, a mother/daughter at LOVING, these are all examples of the Agnes Nixon "troublesome daughter/put upon mother" trope. Are Carla/Sadie by any chance one of the pairs that make up this trope? Another thing that these 2 shows might have in common. OLTL had a very strong thematic approach to socioeconomic differences between groups of people. Class differences. AW at an earlier point had this too but to be clear it was not as much as OLTL. So that is a similarity but marginal.  Besides that, I see no other comparable things. Paul Rauch was a very different EP at different shows. Oh, I've thought of one more thing. Using actors from the Broadway stage.  But, realistically that was something all of the NY shows had in common. So I don't think it has any uniqueness between AW & OLTL.  
    • When you look at the period between Sweeps, it's as if they tried to maintain a kind of pace where they had a lot of plates spinning in the air & on their fingertips & the whole goal was nothing but to not drop any of those plates. A version of spinning one's wheels. They're not getting anywhere but they give the appearance of a whole lot of activity. I believe it's all about this appearance. At moments they accidentally hit a chord & something resonates but it is a false event.
    • He found the hidden camera and removed the card 
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m not speculating anything, but I admit, I’m getting a little worried about James Reynolds. 
    • I feel like this is what they're doing by creating lots of storylines but their biggest weakness for years is the inability to properly pace these stories and give resolution. A good example now would be the Gio story which has been simmering for months with very little movement. I went from not caring to being invested to not caring again because of how long it's taking for the secret to be revealed. One story like that would be fine but it seems like everything moves at this snails pace on GH. They need to do a better job of rotating the stories so everything isn't in that same treading water phase.
    • However, those of us who watch DAYS have been spoiled. On Peacock there are no preemptions. Not for anything & not in or about any show.  I read somewhere that we Baby Boomers in a way invented instant gratification but then we realized that it was not fast enough.
    • The title track from the follow-up album Hot On the Trail is also co-written by Val Jean:  

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy