Jump to content

GH: November 2024 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Thanks!  I actually never knew that.  I thought it was more tied to her contract being up and having a new baby.  I don't think Guza would have done well with Lois now that you say that.  I do still wonder how the Ned/Lois/Jax triangle would have went though.

I actually really like this beat too.  I hope GH doesn't just drop it.  It's pretty rare in soaps for kids/teens to express how they want to be together despite not all being blood related.  Usually when a parent dies the children just split up and go to the remaining parent without much thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I said the same the other day and totally agree. Especially if Jason and Drew stay on the outs on top of Dante's attempts to keep the family together.

Taste. But same. There was such a good job of blending that family IMHO that the potential for drama is there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Guza had already moved Jax to Brenda. I don’t think there was a full story planned with Jax/Lois due to the transition happpening bts, just some ideas. And Culliton was in place when she actually left, during the Tracy pop-in story that was forced on the show by ABC for Tracy going to The City. Which is interesting, because a few months later Genie also left for maternity leave and didn’t want to come back because she was happy at home and the writing sucked.

I really hope they decide to play a story for the kids where they stay connected. I don’t want another sibling against sibling thing to happen, especially when they find out Lulu is awake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, yeah.  I knew Jax was married to Brenda by the time Lois left I was just always curious what the story with Ned/Jax/Lois would have been.  I didn't know it was just some ideas.  I obviously think Guza made the right choice moving Jax to Brenda.  I just always wondered how the show would have tried to make that work considering Lois was happily married and then pregnant when Jax tried to make a play for her lol.

Anyhow, I do think the sibling story might be dropped once Lulu wakes up and is back in PC.  For once, I am really curious to see how AH does as Lulu and how this all plays out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like having Lu Lu back

I thought her reaction to the light was realistic however If she can move her arms and legs freely I hope they say something like nurses were working her arms and legs while she was in the coma.

 

As for Danny/Scout/Rocco I hope they continue to think of each other as family

 

I also would not mind Scout and maybe even Danny feel a pull to Lu lu because their mom saved her life. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He was never very strong but he has some charisma which put him over earlier in the year, though I've never been very impressed. They've got to get someone else on him, not that the FV speed-taping method helps anyone.

Same here. Ned and Alexis to me were always purely and simply fine. They were two actors with dry wit and chemistry who shared a lot of good dialogue, and that was about it. I was more into Jax and Alexis, but that didn't happen (or Ned and Lois, but she was gone). It was when they got into the stuff you mentioned that I soured on them. Compared to most of today's couples of course, Ned and Alexis' material seems like Moonlighting.

And I've discussed Chloe too - I liked her a lot, I even liked her with Stefan in that bizarre psychic visions story that never got explained and I'm still upset about her death. If they introduced a surprise kid of Chloe's sometime (not from one of her onscreen love interests, Korte!) to help shore up the Qs I wouldn't squawk.

At this point I'd bring on a woman for Alexis. Why not. She couldn't possibly do worse with the same sex.

We've been over this before, but agreed it's so weird. There was a very brief discussion of it when they first got cozy under RC and it's never been touched on again, probably because the current writers are bewildered and frightened by the prospect of having to dive into anything more nuanced like that. Not on Frank's GH! I wish it would be discussed though.

I have no problem with Ned and Olivia as they are. I love Lisa and I think they're a fine tentpole couple, and Ned and Lois is never going to happen again because Wally and Rena aren't comfortable with it. But I would have them at least talk about all of it.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I also felt Ned/Alexis took a really, really long time to get anywhere.  After the mixed marrieds they just seem to linger on together not doing much until that awful wedding stuff.  By then I had mostly lost interest although I still do enjoy their banter (when it's rarely allowed) even to this day.

I do remember you liked Chloe/TS.  I think the overall opinion is that she and Chloe were a dud, but at least she was related to Lila.  It was silly to kill her off, but they had to since she was Quartermaine adjacent obviously.  

Interesting idea to bring a surprise Chloe kid on the canvas.  The show probably could have done that with Gio-he has the same sunny personality lol. I wonder if anyone in the audience would even remember Chloe.  But, I mean, they brought Jagger back after a million years so Frank doesn't really care about relevancy. 

And to make this post about current GH and not break the rules-I will say some of the Sam clips they used today were strange.  KeMo/Sam had about a million different moments on the show and GH seemed to use some of the most boring ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Brings back my dreams of an Alexis/Lorraine (a.k.a. Harmony) hookup. And it'd be why she killed Neil. I sensed that tension between them. But I do believe a later-in-life romance with a woman would be amazing for Alexis, and may explain her less-than-stellar track record with the men in her life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, we have definitely had this discussion before lol.  It would have been very easy for Lois/Olivia then Lois/Ned to have a convo right when she returned and moved on from it.  I know we are not getting Ned/Lois ever, but it's strange Lois wasn't a little put off her bff from Bensonhurst married her ex husband even if it was years later.  I don't think the dialogue even has to have that much nuance.  It is just a bit of an elephant in the room now.

I know you like Ned/Olivia much more than I do.  They are fine.  Not anywhere near the top of my list of things GH needs to fix.  LLC is just sort of there for me.  I am pretty neutral on Olivia.  I actually liked her the most when she was with Johnny.

I did sort of think they might go there for awhile, but then I remembered it was GH and that would be way too scary and taboo for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Harmony creeped me the hell out.

I love LLC; Ned and Olivia are merely just fine for me. As it is though I don't need them to be broken up. Were Robert not so terribly feeble now I'd have kept playing that angle in spite of Ned, and I did like her with Johnny. But he's not around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

BB is now jobless and available!! J/K I don't want Johnny Z back although he probably could have a place on canvas with Lulu waking up.  Anyhow, we don't need more unnecessary people on the show.

You know I liked Robert/Olivia too.  I just hope Tristian enjoys his retirement at this point though.  The one thing I will say about LLC is she's had chemistry with pretty much every love interest she's had even duds like Scott Reeves and Mo.  

That's just mean lol.  I would giggle if Alexis stole her from Sonny though.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I guess RTPP looked worse because it followed Another World, but it's a shame they didn't give it more time especially considering how the shows that were put on following it fared.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Durkin was awful. The writing did her no favors, but she was all wrong for the part, lacking the mix of mystery, steeliness, sorrow and hesitancy that defined Victoria. I still have the awful memory of Adam lugging her around like a rag doll. She looked much more like one of the Blue Whale dancing extras than Victoria. And her voice... Maybe I am too harsh. With that said, Curtis didn't seem as bothered. I see from a fan review mentioning Barnabas & Company that Durkin was asked to return for Victoria's final episodes and declined as she had a Christmas trip to Europe with her husband planned and wasn't interested in just a few appearances.  I refuse to believe Victoria actually died during the Leviathan storyline. If Barnabas and Angelique could come back 8 times, she could come back a few.
    • It's a shame she only appeared in three episodes for the purpose of being written out - I thought she was quite good in the little we saw. I liked her vibe better than Durkin that never seemed to quite capture Victoria as a character.
    • He did a lot of romance novel covers, so that might've just been enough for them to get their panties in a twist.
    • Pre-TGIF, ABC most successful 1980s Friday 8 pm comedy I'd say was Webster. Full House wasn't a hit its first two seasons but it started showing growth in its third season which overlapped with the launch of TGIF. Funny thing is, Full House became a Top 10 show with the 1991/92 move to Tuesday.
    • Oakland Tribune, 14 July 1985   AW is another show with Schenkel at helm By Connie Passalacqua For the most part, dictators of South American banana republics enjoy better reputations than executive producers of daytime soap operas. Total authority is vested in these producers, who can kill off a character (thus firing an actor) with a stroke of a pen, or completely change life in his or her soap opera dominion (both in its fictional locale and backstage at the studio) on any kind of whim.  Most rule despotically, inspiring fear in their actors and writers. Which inevitably surfaces on the screen and subtracts from a show's quality. Then there's Stephen Schenkel who became executive producer of Another World last fall. He's been described by one of his actresses as "a teddy bear." He has noticeably improved the show, mostly because his natural warmth encourages backstage cohesiveness, and he believes in personally nurturing his staff and cast. 'I like to be supportive', he said.' I like to generate a certain amount of enthusiasm. I love actors and writers and technical people. And I like to laugh..  ' Schenkel said that most of the factors that have led to the shows improved ratings existed before he took over. There were well defined characters, outstanding writers and excellent production values, he explains. 'These things were in place but needed to be stimulated. There wasn't a lot of excitement. What really was missing was an adequate story. We added Gillian Spencer as a writer. (she also plays Daisy on All My Children), who's wonderful, and it just coalesced. The writers energy and commitment to the show began to give it an emotional intensity and some real passion within the characters." Schenkel, a former ABC programming executive who helped develop Ryan's Hope, is a strong believer in stressing romantic and comedy elements in soap operas. AW is also one of the only soaps with an established group of comic characters, including Wallingford (Brent Collins) and Lily Mason (Jackee , Harry). Schenkel raves about the talents of all his actors, and even has something good to say about the Brooklyn location of the shows studio, which most of his Manhattan-oriented staff loathe. I like the people here. I like to walk down the street and feel their energies, he said. He also violateda soap opera no-no, ' inviting actors and writers to the same party. "Everyone got to know one another, he said. And I didn't get any complaints about actors ' begging for story lines, he said. 
    • Since it's pride month.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • National City Star-News, 5 May 1977 TV topics by Peter Blazi Lear’s ‘All that Glitters’—doesn’t The best thing that can be said about Norman Lear’s newest soap opera“All That Glitters” is that it comes on so late at night most people will miss it. Role reversal is supposed to be the big draw, with women the breadwinners, mainly executives of a huge conglomerate. The men either fuss with the housework or fidget at the office as secretaries to their bawdy bosses. A female fantasyland? I doubt it. While the role reversal idea has some possibilities, the show pushes too hard for laughs and winds up with raucous females and effete males. A confident, independent woman is indeed a sight to behold and attract, but femininity need not be sacrificed. Unlike Lear’s “Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman,” "Glitters” doesn’t, but you’ve got to give him credit for trying. Today’s experimental comedy is what tomorrow’s hits are made of. Better luck next time, Norman. (“All That Glitters” can be seen weekday evenings at 11 p.m. on Channel 6.) .
    • Actually Kim Zimmer got six weeks off to test the waters for pilot season in L.A. - she said later she went on many auditions and got one offer for a sitcom, but she would one of many in an ensemble. She turned it down, because it wasn't worth leaving Guiding Light for a supporting role on a sitcom. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy