Jump to content

DAYS: September 2024 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 489
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

On the plus side, at least Steve thought to ask Clyde about how John wound up in the same place as F-Abby.

I hate it when a villain is confronted and characters forget to ask the obvious questions.

On the other hand, I have no idea why Melinda would care if Gabi loves Stefan, while being tied to a chair with a head wound!

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Gabi, what are you praying for? You know you ain’t going to Heaven

Please register in order to view this content

Today was broken down very strangely. I thought it was a little odd that the bomb went off at the beginning of today’s episode. That would have been the perfect Friday cliffhanger. And it would have been better than the sort of cliffhanger that we ended up getting. If they had waited, it could have allowed other characters to get caught in the blast as well, like Jada or Chad and NotAbigail, for example. 

I also find it odd that Stefan, Ava, everybody couldn’t take down this bumbling little sad sack with a tiny knife. But whatevs, just glad that this storyline is ending.

And if today indicated that we’re going to get an actual EJ/Gabi pairing, I don’t mind it. I just wish they hadn’t rushed it. 

Mark didn’t seem to fit in with today’s episode though, but it was nice to see him. He meshes well with other characters. I just feel bad about who he’s (probably) gonna be paired with

Speaking of that pairing, we haven’t seen that character in a while and it’s been great lol the way he’s been shoved down our throats, you’d think Days would be lost without him. Hopefully, Janet or the new writers see that and take action. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I cannot imagine DAYS of the past using Connie as the big summer story.  I guess it advanced Stefan/Ava and EJ/Gabi, but only through trauma.  What's missing is two romantic characters solving a crime together.  30 years ago, Tripp and Wendy would've spent the summer solving Li's murder, dancing in an abandoned room, learning to trust each other.  Now, they're off in the Far East and a forgotten footnote to this plot. 

And don't get me started on why Connie would go to Ava's rather than leave town.  I liked my own idea that Connie's “superpower” was that she was so plain in a town of stunning people that she was practically invisible.  But, her trip to Ava's meant that she had to walk through the Pub with a knife, unseen, and get up to Ava's room.  She also had to know where Ava lives, and she had to know that she was alone.  I understand that Connie is meant to be psychotic, but that doesn't mean that she's also psychic.

Finally, the multiple contrivances to separate Chad and F-Abby so she can whine about her plan are silly.  She tells him she remembers something, he says wait so that the kids are in their rooms.  She recites her vows, he's so happy that he leaves the room to take a call.  It defies logic that he keeps leaving at these key moments. 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am glad this Connie story is coming to end.  I know she's CRAZY, but the escalation of her crimes made little sense.  She killed Li, what, almost a year ago and got away with it.   She wasn't on anyone's radar.  Why not just skip town with cardboard Li and move on?  I don't really get why she went from accidently killing Li to a serial killer.   I didn't exactly need more Connie, but some work to show her deteriorating mental state might have helped this story be more believable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But, Johnny is so boring! Someone that boring it's their own damn fault they don't have exciting challenging story!!! And, Chanel is stuck with him, so that taints her with the bor-ing brush, as well. If Johnny didn't have his looks, no one would even give him the time of day. There they are, two fairly pretty people, just stuck & at an age when they ought to be living it up. And, Johnny actually has a gooey moral center. He nails his father on less than ethical things fairly regularly but does ANYONE appreciate his ability to express high ideals?! Are you kidding me? Tripp & Wendy were more interesting, at least some of the time, anyway. And, Chanel was a much more interesting person with Allie than she is with Johnny. 

Since Gabi got out of prison, she went to see her daughter once, right? No mention since that early day, correct? 

So, y'all promise Connie's gone soon, huh? I absolutely positively cannot wait! I am frankly amazed at how bad her story got before finally coming to this somewhat distressing conclusion!!! Was she created by scabs or by Ron? I don't post as much now because I'm on a totally different watching schedule. By the time I watch today's episode, tonight at 11-ish y'all have long since done a whole post mortem on the day, so I am waaaay out of synch. 

 

Just saying hey today. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Johnny and Chanel suffer from a lack of character definition.  They need a motivation, and they need a purpose.  Even if they were just this generation's Tony&Anna and only wanted to fulfill their selfish needs, while commenting on the plebeian lives of those around them, it would be something.  But, to me, they are boring because they have no agenda.

I grow tired of stories where the conflict is external to the relationship, rather than an internal dynamic that complicates the ability to form a lasting commitment.

I realize Alex, Xander, Tate, and Johnny can't all be rich guys with complicated senses of morality, but we require some means of telling them apart.   And when you add in EJ and Brady, the whole town is just men from wealthy families, who aren't driven by achievement, waiting for a girl to kiss them.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Johnny and Chanel are boring because there’s no investment or interest in them. They’re in the same boat that Tripp and Wendy were in, once they finally got together.

The four of them could have been in a messy quad but Ron and co. didn’t take the chance with them. They can blame budgets, guarantees, availability, whatever, but it’s so obvious that if they had wanted to make it happen, they could have. 

As for current storylines, Chanel’s miscarriage would have been the perfect catalyst to cause problems for her and Johnny. One of them could have wanted to have another baby right away, while the other one didn’t. You could have also had EJ or Paulina pressuring either of them for a grandchild. Which leads to a lot of disagreements and arguments between the two of them, which then pushes Chanel to have an affair, as opposed to this Body&Soul crap and Johnny just being jealous about Alex. 

The fact that both of them are completely fine after losing a child is ridiculous. 

Edited by AbcNbc247
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I guess RTPP looked worse because it followed Another World, but it's a shame they didn't give it more time especially considering how the shows that were put on following it fared.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Durkin was awful. The writing did her no favors, but she was all wrong for the part, lacking the mix of mystery, steeliness, sorrow and hesitancy that defined Victoria. I still have the awful memory of Adam lugging her around like a rag doll. She looked much more like one of the Blue Whale dancing extras than Victoria. And her voice... Maybe I am too harsh. With that said, Curtis didn't seem as bothered. I see from a fan review mentioning Barnabas & Company that Durkin was asked to return for Victoria's final episodes and declined as she had a Christmas trip to Europe with her husband planned and wasn't interested in just a few appearances.  I refuse to believe Victoria actually died during the Leviathan storyline. If Barnabas and Angelique could come back 8 times, she could come back a few.
    • It's a shame she only appeared in three episodes for the purpose of being written out - I thought she was quite good in the little we saw. I liked her vibe better than Durkin that never seemed to quite capture Victoria as a character.
    • He did a lot of romance novel covers, so that might've just been enough for them to get their panties in a twist.
    • Pre-TGIF, ABC most successful 1980s Friday 8 pm comedy I'd say was Webster. Full House wasn't a hit its first two seasons but it started showing growth in its third season which overlapped with the launch of TGIF. Funny thing is, Full House became a Top 10 show with the 1991/92 move to Tuesday.
    • Oakland Tribune, 14 July 1985   AW is another show with Schenkel at helm By Connie Passalacqua For the most part, dictators of South American banana republics enjoy better reputations than executive producers of daytime soap operas. Total authority is vested in these producers, who can kill off a character (thus firing an actor) with a stroke of a pen, or completely change life in his or her soap opera dominion (both in its fictional locale and backstage at the studio) on any kind of whim.  Most rule despotically, inspiring fear in their actors and writers. Which inevitably surfaces on the screen and subtracts from a show's quality. Then there's Stephen Schenkel who became executive producer of Another World last fall. He's been described by one of his actresses as "a teddy bear." He has noticeably improved the show, mostly because his natural warmth encourages backstage cohesiveness, and he believes in personally nurturing his staff and cast. 'I like to be supportive', he said.' I like to generate a certain amount of enthusiasm. I love actors and writers and technical people. And I like to laugh..  ' Schenkel said that most of the factors that have led to the shows improved ratings existed before he took over. There were well defined characters, outstanding writers and excellent production values, he explains. 'These things were in place but needed to be stimulated. There wasn't a lot of excitement. What really was missing was an adequate story. We added Gillian Spencer as a writer. (she also plays Daisy on All My Children), who's wonderful, and it just coalesced. The writers energy and commitment to the show began to give it an emotional intensity and some real passion within the characters." Schenkel, a former ABC programming executive who helped develop Ryan's Hope, is a strong believer in stressing romantic and comedy elements in soap operas. AW is also one of the only soaps with an established group of comic characters, including Wallingford (Brent Collins) and Lily Mason (Jackee , Harry). Schenkel raves about the talents of all his actors, and even has something good to say about the Brooklyn location of the shows studio, which most of his Manhattan-oriented staff loathe. I like the people here. I like to walk down the street and feel their energies, he said. He also violateda soap opera no-no, ' inviting actors and writers to the same party. "Everyone got to know one another, he said. And I didn't get any complaints about actors ' begging for story lines, he said. 
    • Since it's pride month.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • National City Star-News, 5 May 1977 TV topics by Peter Blazi Lear’s ‘All that Glitters’—doesn’t The best thing that can be said about Norman Lear’s newest soap opera“All That Glitters” is that it comes on so late at night most people will miss it. Role reversal is supposed to be the big draw, with women the breadwinners, mainly executives of a huge conglomerate. The men either fuss with the housework or fidget at the office as secretaries to their bawdy bosses. A female fantasyland? I doubt it. While the role reversal idea has some possibilities, the show pushes too hard for laughs and winds up with raucous females and effete males. A confident, independent woman is indeed a sight to behold and attract, but femininity need not be sacrificed. Unlike Lear’s “Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman,” "Glitters” doesn’t, but you’ve got to give him credit for trying. Today’s experimental comedy is what tomorrow’s hits are made of. Better luck next time, Norman. (“All That Glitters” can be seen weekday evenings at 11 p.m. on Channel 6.) .
    • Actually Kim Zimmer got six weeks off to test the waters for pilot season in L.A. - she said later she went on many auditions and got one offer for a sitcom, but she would one of many in an ensemble. She turned it down, because it wasn't worth leaving Guiding Light for a supporting role on a sitcom. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy