Jump to content

DAYS: Our hopes for the new HW’s


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I’ve never been sure if the people who work on these shows read message boards like this, but in case they do, and since the new writers are currently in the infancy of their run at Days (They’ll be 9 months ahead by the time we get to see their material!), what would we like to see from them? 

Realistically, we can’t ask for shorter film to air dates, and for them to do things outside their budget, that keeps the show running, but I would love to see certain stories.

More Hortons and less DiMera’s. The previous regime has ruined the DiMera’s for me. Stefano is dead. Rest them all and the predictable and boring stories that go along with them. Bring on the next generation of Hortons. There are literally so many options. Claire, Will, Nathan, Jeremy, Eli, Ciara (without Ben please) could all return with their families. Scotty, Sandy and Steven could all have children and grandchildren who make their way to Salem. Make the Hortons the center of the show, not the DiMera’s. 

Make death a permanent thing in Salem. Back from the dead is such a lazy plot point. It’s more interesting for characters to be alive when they leave a show, then to let everyone false grieve and bring them back months later with little to no regard to what they were doing before their “death”. Again, Stefano is dead, let back from the dead’s be as well. 

With that being said, before we make death permanent, please bring back Laura and Abigail. Both of these characters had horrible and unnecessary endings. They are to important to the history of the show to go out like they did. Fix it. 

Please fix other mistakes like Bo and Hope’s and Belle and Shawn’s current states. Have Marlena be in stories with her family, and not in stories with pointless characters like Everett and Leo.

Write the show with a more serious and realistic tone. Soap operas are campy and unserious at times yes, but by writing the cheap JER rip offs that the previous regime did makes it painfully obvious, especially when you don’t have the budget to produce it. Look to the 60s and 70s for ideas. Days told melodramatic and riveting stories with a smaller budget than they had in the 80s and 90s and had a much larger audience because of it. 

Edited by cody_1990
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

This is one of the things that finally got me to stop watching the show after many, many years....waaaaay too much emphasis on the Dimeras. They took over the whole entire show, and as a result DAYS lost its heart IMO, the Hortons and the Bradys. The Hortons are practically nonexistent at this point which I find so sad.

So, so many Dimeras. Why do we need Stefan? Even Johnny? Chad is a keeper, maybe EJ, but we don't need the rest of them. Kristen really needed a rest. If there was one single Dimera I'd bring on it would be Theo. It would be interesting to see him torn between the Carver and DiMera worlds, and I always liked his relationship with Chad.

I enjoyed a lot of RC first few years, but then I started feeling like I was watching Days fanfiction versus something professionally written.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think I might want too much lol 

Most of all, I think I just want it to be like a soap again. For it to have a well balanced, well thought out canvas without any biases or obsessions writing the show for them. And also, to not have everything be written like a big, stupid joke.

And of course, firing Greg Rikaart and killing off Leo once and for all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've said it before, but I think DAYS's issues are deeper than a headwriter, but maybe with both Alarr and Ron gone we can start seeing a real change? 

I do wonder about Cwikly though - if she had issues staying on budget over twenty years ago, how long can she survive on the shoe-string budget?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would hope that the writers start cutting out all of the unnecessary deadweight like Leo, Alex, Connie, Stefan, Gwenresa, Ava, and Bonnie. I also hope that they start phasing out the DiMeras by getting rid of Stefan and Kristen and only keep Chad, E.J. and Johnny around regularly. Kristen and Megan, (and probably Dimitri), should only pop in to cause trouble every now and then.

They also need to start rebuilding the Hortons by bringing back as many of them as possible including Will, Allie, Jeremy, Nathan, Melissa, J.J., Eli, etc., and if they do bring Jeremy back, I hope they actually acknowledge what Jeremy did to Stephanie all of those years ago and don't try to sweep it under the rug and they also give Jeremy an actual proper redemption arc if that's their intention. 

The one thing that Ron actually did right was add in more diversity so I would hope the new writers continue that. I would hope that they keep the Carver/Grant/Price clan and they also keep Andrew and all of the other gay characters around. Maybe they could also bring Jada's sister Talia back at some point but it would also be okay if they ultimately didn't do that. 

I would also hope that the writers leave characters like Everett, Gwen/Theresa and Leo far behind in the past and none of those characters are seen or heard from again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
  • Return of Families: I want to see the return and re-building of families in Salem. The Bradys, the Hortons and the Kiriakis'. And then, hopefully, re-introduce some of the older families like the Martins (ie: Scotty Banning), etc.
  • No More Camp/Slap-shtick Bullshït/Soap Tropes: Face masks, voice-changers, back-from-the-deads, Devil takeovers should all be GONE! No more of that bullshït. Focus on forward-moving stories that are thought-provoking and topical of the times. The "writer" really made a comedy of the canvas, and I know both Paula Cwikly & Jeanne Marie Ford have their hands full to fix this, but I hope they can do it.
  • Cut the Dead Weight/Return Those We Care About: Blake Berris (Everett), Elia Cantu (Jada), Stacy Haiduk (Kristen/Susan), Jackée Harry (Paulina), Leo Howard (Tate), AnnaLynne McCord (no1curr), Emily O'Brien (Theresa), Ashley Puzemis (Holly), Greg Rikaart (Leo), Josh Taylor (Roman; demote to recurring) & Robert Scott Wilson (Alex) could and should all be cut from the cast, and no one would miss them. Use their spaces to return those we want to see ⏤ Brandon Beemer (Shawn-Douglas), Christie Clark (Carrie), John-Paul Lavoisier (Philip), Colton Little (Andrew), Martha Madison (Belle), Austin Peck (Austin; temporary), Christopher Sean (Paul), Tanner Stine (Joey), Zach Tinker (Sonny) et al. Give us back some familiarity to the canvas. It's time. It's high-time.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEES. YES. YES. YES. This sh-t should have stayed in the early 2000s. No more cheap Scream 5 parody storylines in soaps PLEASE. PLEASEEEEEEEEE. 

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love how we’re all in agreement about Leo

Please register in order to view this content

Slightly off topic, but has there ever been a soap character so universally despised by the Soap Universe that’s been shoved down our throats like Leo has?

In terms of other character exits, I’m hoping Bobby-Everett, Connie and maybe Ava and Kristen are sent packing as well.

And agreed that Andrew/Colton Little is hopefully made full time as well. He wants it, his onscreen boyfriend wants it and the fans want it. So, what’s the problem lol 

Edited by AbcNbc247
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Yes, I am familiar with Fred Silverman. Agree, the 90 minute AW a very poor decision by Silverman. I think Silverman was behind the decision to go with Texas.
    • Thanks -- you're doing God's work The Gio reveal was everything I hoped for and more. GH got it right. Head to toe, GM is a stunning physical specimen.
    • I really wonder how they'll handle Netflix's usual long breaks between seasons. That girl is going to grow up fast... makes me wonder if this wouldn't have been a better fit for HBO Max considering they're leaning into a more broadcast style of production model with The Pitt.
    • I agree -- I didn't suspect Ted, either. I think a lot of people are giving themselves way too much credit in predicting Ted's problems

      Please register in order to view this content

      And can I have a different take on Ted here? Yes, he's made a huge mistake with this Leslie debacle, and yes, he has to suffer and pay for it. But does that make Ted a terrible human being? I don't think it does. He made a horrific mistake over 2 decades ago, and as far as we know, he's been a good husband and father since. As far as we know, he hasn't strayed or violated his marriage since. He didn't know that he fathered another child, and thought he "removed" Leslie from his life. I won't blame Nicole if she doesn't forgive him, but I also won't blame her if she decides what they have and what they've had more than makes up for what he did. Ted is getting dragged far more than Bill is on these boards, and I think Bill is MUCH worse as a husband and father. How many times did he cheat on Dani during their marriage? How many times did he do vile things in his role as fixer? How much did he hurt his daughters by screwing their friend and marrying her? With Keith Robinson coming in as Ted, maybe we'll see a character change in direction and we'll discover that Ted has many flaws and always had a dark side. For now, though, I'm inclined to both be angry with Ted for hurting his family while also sympathizing with him. I know what you mean, but I do think that was intentional. So much was going on in that episode, and I think they decided not to let Nicole's reaction be lost in all that. Nicole will get those scenes that you're asking for.  
    • That was the original point of me sending you her 6 airdates, so now with those, and the link to the daily episode guide I've provided, that should help you more easily find the additional Ruth Buzzi scenes. I will always repeat myself when it comes to defending my data that I've taken decades to research and compile. But, as you pointed out in a recent post, I am kind, so at least I will do it with you in a kind way as opposed to the usual social media way most people do with just getting rude/nasty. That's not my style, as you correctly pointed out earlier this week, and never will be.  So, all is well! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Ambyr Michelle continues to be *that girl.* She’s just a star, period. Elevates every scene she’s in on the sheer strength of her emotional realism and charisma. Can sell any dialogue. I wish the show veered away from the B&B-style scripting. TMG/Leslie’s tirade stood out, I suppose, but she’s getting a bit mustache-twirly. And I wish DD had more to do in that episode than stand and sob.
    • Well, that was down to CBS being weak and not being willing to just pulling the plug entirely. They didn't want to commit to cancelling the show in case they needed it for their schedule basically; plus they kept showing that they were willing to make cuts if needed to be. 
    • I'm sorry but clearly what I've said is not satisfactory to you. I have now read what you have to say, twice. As it happens, my interest at this point is looking at other mislabeled files to find this other Ruth Buzzi content. I do not see any point to each of us repeating ourselves, so I will leave it here. 
    • It seemed to be your intent. coming into a thread I started and making multiple posts saying my data was wrong. In the next paragraph you say "Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why." That certainly didn't stop you from immediately saying the data was wrong, until I provided additional receipts. Why did you not check the daily episode guide (for instance, this one for the 1980's) I posted for the world to see for exactly this reason...to help confirm airdates: http://daytimeroyaltyonline.com/days-daily-summaries-1980-1989-t15361.html? That is what you should be checking BEFORE you make any posts in the future like this, trying to suggest something from my data is incorrect. You could have also messaged me and asked me why your dates weren't adding up with what the correct data is. I would have fast forwarded through that video you posted, spotted Roman and Hope and immediately have told you that was the 11/1/83 episode.
    • Jason, just let me say that it was not my intent to any way impugn any of your data  or research. I'm very sorry if it came out that way. Obviously the person I got these 4 November episodes from has mislabeled files, multiples, which I was certainly unaware of.  When I am editing it is all about what I see & hear. Later, I find time for greater reflection.  Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why.  If you find you are no longer interested in the edit, that is fine. I have no ego in this. I did it only to share it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy