Jump to content

RIP: Producer Joseph Hardy Dies at 95


John

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I'd love to know that as well.  Didn't he also work on LOL and LIAMST?  And then, of course, there was that year he spent as Supervising Producer on KNOTS LANDING.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But the fact that he was there for that long doesn't necessarily mean that's where he made the greatest impact, especially if RH fans appear to agree that his time there was, for the most part, poor.

I'd love to know what, if any, positive impact he had on any show he produced, or whether he was just someone who was more suited to working in the theater.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It was during KNOTS' abominable S13, with John Romano as Co-EP/Showrunner:

Please register in order to view this content

I suspect that it was Michael Filerman, who had worked at CBS Daytime (first, under Fred Silverman and maybe Paul Rauch; then, later, on his own, I think), who hired Hardy to perform a lot of the same duties that Lawrence Kasha - like Hardy, a theater veteran - had before his untimely death in 1990.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks. I doubt most of that was Hardy's fault but the changeover couldn't have helped. This helps explain why those last few seasons feel so different to me.

The best thing about season 13 remains their going back to the old opening credits music and style.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree.  Two things hurt KNOTS in S13: the fact that the Lechowicks and Stanleys had left the show in such a mess; and the fact that the team hired to replace them (Romano, James Magnuson, Donald Marcus, Rachel Cline, Lisa Seidman) had no prior knowledge of the show.  (IMO, Michael Filerman and David Jacobs were stupid not to guide Romano and his team at least initially, until they had learned how the show worked).

And you're right about Kasha's passing casting a bit of a shadow over the last few seasons of KNOTS.  IIRC, he died either right before the 1990-91 season or soon after it premiered, but they kept his name in the credits until the end of the season.  Either way, it does seem like the show began to spiral once he was no longer involved.  The latter half of S13 and most of S14 were improvements, but even they paled to "golden era" KNOTS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members


May he rest in peace, but it seemed anytime in the later years of the Lorimar sops when Filerman got personally involved everything turned to $#!+. See what happened to Falcon Crest’s Season 8, yikes. Filerman made some very reckless decisions and poor choices on both FC and Knots, and earlier on Flamingo Road (I think?). He was better off collecting a check and just doing his minimum oversight as did for so many years before getting personally involved. 
 

Filerman later apologized for some stuff in some interview with a fan club in the early ‘00’s, which was interesting and added some perspective. After Four Corners flopped badly I don’t think Filerman ever worked again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

True.  Between his creative meddling on KL, FC, etc., and all the reports of his abusive behavior BTS, Michael Filerman was a producer who never knew when to leave things well enough alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I enjoyed season 12 of Knots Landing and I felt like the finale was more the new writers coming to set things up. I could be wrong though. John Romano was all wrong for the show and recently when re-watching Party of Five, I noticed in the 5th season I was really struggling to connect with the show. I checked the credits and surprise surprise, John Romano was the new showrunner. That man does not know how to write a soap.

Edited by Chris B
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes that was the season, and Romano was also heavily criticized for also trying make the Ned/Julia abusive relationship story look “sexy”.
 

The running joke online was the show went downhill after the cast’s Entertainment Weekly cover story in ‘97, but Romano’s tenure was the coffin nails like @Chris B had said.

Between the Knots and Party of Five stints Romano had been responsible for two very notorious flops, one being the disastrous Glenn Frey South of Sunset, the other being a failed David Caruso comeback drama made at the bottom depths of Caruso’s career. After Romano was fired at Party of Five, I don’t think he ever worked on anything significant ever again. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • As always, really interesting to get your impressions! I was only watching sporadically during this period (whereas I was transfixed during the Marian storyline), but if I remember correctly 1996 was a pretty rough transitional year. It came at a period where P&G was playing musical chairs with its executive producers--ATWT was hit especially hard by this. The current executive producer, Michael Laibson, is out in November 1996, replaced by Paul Rauch, who stays for nearly 6 years. While Rauch has a few really bad ideas that cause long-term damage to the show, those don't really kick in until 1999, and his first couple of years are very strong. So once you get to 1997, you should see the show rebound significantly. 
    • Haha love a little drunk posting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m up to April 01, 1996. I think I’m starting to understand what many have said.. things are different. I miss the community vibe of Springfield, when you had people working at the hectic newspaper, the choatic diner, the rich were coming in for coffee, or the TV network was abuzz about the latest scandal. Things have become a little more tunneled into their own storylines. Right now, for me anyway, there isn’t a strong desire to see what happens next, ever since the Brent/Marian story ended. It was a darker, more suspenseful storyline that really got me intrigued and waiting to see what happens next, while everything else was just a nice view of midwestern families living their dramatic lives. And I love that too, when the characters and storytelling is strong, but right now, some things are a little stale. In these last 5 weeks, we had two bigger events: Nick and Susan’s wedding:  it was sweet, but I really found it weird they played music over their vows instead of being able to hear them. Then, they leave town immediately after and for good? We really didn’t get a ton of time with them - one minute Susan is in a hospital bed, post-coma, celebrating the new year, and now she’s married and gone. I’m having a hard time with the revolving door of characters since my early ’95 watch. This year we’ve lost so many characters, gained so many characters, and to what end? Henry’s funeral:  this was so sad, considering the real actor passed. I’m curious what other fans thought about the funeral. Granted, when an actor passes, you don’t have much time to plan ahead, so you need to insert it into whatever storylines are happening at the time.  But sadly, this funeral happened when everyone was hating each other. Vanessa was upset with Matt because the Amanda secret came out and he kept it from her. Quint showed up, with his very young affair no less, which made both Nola and J upset. Amanda was there which upset both Blake and Ross. Roger insisted he give a speech which upset everyone. Vanessa was mad at Quint for bringing his young girlfriend, and then Dinah was so upset about her grandfather, which was emotional, but everyone is currently at odds with Dinah. The flashbacks were effective, and the most emotional scene was Vanessa’s breakdown when reading Henry’s letter to her.  Otherwise, it was a pretty hateful funeral, which felt icky. Otherwise, my quick pros and cons currently happening… Pros: Alex and Hawk are great and funny. He gets under her skin and it’s hilarious to watch her react, but she needs him. They were in LA trying to get dirt on Amanda’s former life and Hawk was living it up with young gorgeous women and all the spending money at his disposal.  Generally, the Amanda and her secret storyline is interesting and I really like the actress. Alex vs. Amanda is entertaining. Tina came onto the scene around the time Nadine died, but she’s been given a backstory which is interesting to me now. She’s a prostitute, who means well, and is trying to take care of her daughter, Dahlia. She grew up with Frank, who has a soft spot for her. Marcus, in a new storyline he desperately needed away from Dinah and his dad, has taken a strong liking to Dahlia. She sings well and he plays saxophone well, so their music is endearing. Sadly, Tina got involved in a robbery gone-bad, where they held up a Spaulding board of directors meeting. She flees, but Frank catches her outside and is forced to arrest her, while Cleary (she’s back!) arrests the main bad guy involved and saves the Spaulding family. I’m curious to see where this one goes, but curious, was Tina actually on the show before this or is she a brand new character? Cons: The Dinah/Hart/Roger storyline is pretty stale now. I need something new. Lucy and Alan-Michael are barely on since Brent left, which is sad. You spend an entire year on a storyline that builds their relationship, brings strife and wedges, and now that they’re finally able to be together in love with no obstacles, you never show them? I want to see them happy! Oh and Lucy and Bridget/David haven't had a scene since Marian tried to get 'a room at the boarding house, which is weird because we haven't seen Bridget react to Lucy being alive. I don't even know if Lucy even lives at the boarding house or with AM, but it's sad pretending like Lucy/Bridget/David were never close friends. Reva/Josh, which is hogging airtime, is a serious whiplash. One week Josh loves her, she hates him; the next week, she loves him, he hates her. He’s always lying to Annie, but now he’s marrying her again, the second wedding in 4 months. I’m also very tired of Marah, her angst over everything, and their overwhelming concern over her. As much as I don’t like Buzz, it is funny watching Reva work at the diner, but I’ll never side with Alan so watching him have feelings about Reva/Buzz or Reva/Josh does nothing for me. Finally, the other small B storylines are only on like once a week which isn’t enough:  Gilly/Griffin/Viviane, Michelle/J, Blake/Ross/Rick, Rick/Abby, Holly/Fletcher and the baby. Something that just popped up out of the blue is David Grant leaving Springfield out of nowhere. He professed his love to Bridget, who turned him down, so he decides to leave when Griffin gives him a job opportunity. Sadly, another character written out for many new characters being introduced. Makes me wonder who is making these calls - the producers, the network, the writers, the fans?
    • OH. The AMC/OLTL Crossover with helicopter, down in the woods, 2 very pregnant, both give birth, only one baby lives. We are on the same page!!!
    • Backtracking because BTG has been distracting me from keeping up with GH. Why is Carly always involved with a paternity lie? Lulu is Dante's (wife? if Im correct) so she has the right to tell him about his son. If anything, she's in a better place to reveal paternity drama than Robin was. As for Robin...I'm conflicted about whether it was HER place to tell AJ he was Michael's dad. Being with a man who's pretending to be someone else's baby daddy is wild. Dante was snoring blaming everyone  but Rocco, however he was right about Jason. A convo isn't enough, neither is trying to be your son's friend. Adolescents need a disciplinarian. At least Lulu made Rocco and Danny scrub the house. 
    • May 2025: Stephanie Sloane interviews Kirsten Storms about all of Maxie's romances in the past 20 years: https://www.swooon.com/gallery/general-hospital-maxie-romances-spinelli-johnny-nathan-kirsten-storms/
    • I saw a new BTG promo during Watson tonight (Sunday May 11).   I don't remember what I saw (and I wouldn't say here on the nonspoiler thread anyhow). I know only that it was different from the "next on BTG" preview at the end of Friday's episode. If anyone catches the new promo, please post it on the spoiler thread.
    • I hope GH gives Lesley an on screen memorial I'd love to have Scott, Robert, Holly, Rose Kelly, Mike Webber, Blackie Parish  & Claudia Phillips return for the episodes
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy