Jump to content

Tank Jobs and Sabotage


kalbir

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Thought this article was appropriate for this thread

‘Designing Women’ becomes Thursday’s sacrificial lamb By Michael Dougan San Francisco Examiner SAN FRANCISCO (Scripps) Wed December 17 1986

Annie Potts and Dixie Carter were eating lunch when word came that their funny new CBS aeries “Designing Women” had scored miserably low numbers In the overnight Nielsens in its first Thursday outing, So low in fact that “Designing Women” rated 58th in the weekly figures — a disastrous drop from the No 20 slot it enjoyed when it aired on Monday the week before.

Despite its great success as a Monday show following “Newhart” “Designing Women” is not likely to prevail against NBC’s “Night Court", part of a quartet of programs (with “The Cosby Show” “Family Ties” and “Cheers”) that has given American viewers an unshakeable NBC habit come Thursday evenings.

Television Is an industry that eats its young 

In order to boost its own pitiable Thursday night ratings CBS moved “Designing Women” Into the death zone. The results were predictable - not only did “Designing Women” drew an abominable Nielsen rating but its “share” — the percentage of sets actually turned on at the time it aired — was a mere 15 vs 41 for “Night Court” and 21 for ABC’s ‘The Colbys”. “We did not win over The Colbys?’ ’’ moaned Carter “Oh Annie I hadn’t expected us to be lower than The Colbys’. ’’ “Did they have naked women on last night or something?” said Potts “That’s better than they’ve ever done” She stared glumly into her minestrone.

Kim LeMasters is the CBS programming chief who made the decision to shift “Designing Women” onto the Thursday night minefield. On this Black Friday Potts and Carter were mentally scratching LeMasters off their Chrlstmas-card lists. They had learned of the move to Thursdays only two weeks earlier, “We were shocked and we were frightened,” Carter recalled. “We didn’t know what to make of this and Kim LeMasters came to see us to assure us that this was a vote of confidence. Although he acknowledged that this was not the best thing to do for Designing Women, it was the best thing to do for CBS on Thursday nights.He thought we were up to it”

The topic shifted — however lightly — to Hal Holbrook, Carter’s husband, as It happened the “Designing Women” guest star on that ill-fated Thursday debut.“I’m just so angry” said Potts “that a man of his stature could come along strictly out of his affection for all of us and his extraordinary love for Dixie and do this show . “And” chimed in Carter, “that he would have the foul luck to be a sacrificial lamb on our first night.” I asked whether CBS might consider a second move if “Designing Women” continues to founder “That’s what Kim LeMasters said right to us” Carter replied “He said they would move us back to Monday nights but now that (CBS’ new series) The Cavanaughs’ has scored a marvelous rating on Monday night ”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 129
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

For me, the ideal CBS "Ladies' Night" Monday Night lineup would have been:

8:00/7:00: "Kate & Allie"

8:30/7:30: "The Cavanaughs"*

9:00/8:00: "Newhart"

9:30/8:30: "Designing Women"

10:00/9:00: "Cagney & Lacey"

(*Yes, I loved watching "The Cavanaughs."  Shut up.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

CBS messed up their Thursday lineup in Fall 1986.

Magnum, P.I. was effectively over Spring 1986 after being slaughtered by The Cosby Show, but in Fall 1986 CBS moved it to Wednesday 9 pm head-to-head w/ Dynasty. Magnum, P.I. was able to win the time slot a few times, but it was still below the Top 30.

Simon & Simon got clobbered by Cheers in 1985/86 but w/ the move to 8 pm head-to-head w/ The Cosby Show it was DOA. Simon & Simon was moved to 8:30 pm then back to 9 pm, but the damage was already done.

Knots Landing was moved up to 9 pm where it was weakened by Cheers. CBS saw the error of their ways and moved Knots Landing back to 10 pm but then NBC moved L.A. Law to Thursday 10 pm and Knots Landing got weakened further.

Designing Women bounced around the schedule in its rookie season, Monday 9:30 pm to Thursday 9:30 pm to Sunday 9 pm then back to Monday 9:30 pm. Apparently it was cancelled in Spring 1987 then uncancelled.

Thursday would remain a CBS dead zone until Survivor and CSI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not sure if CBS had officially cancelled DW, or if they were thinking seriously about it.  Either way, Viewers for Quality Television launched a letter-writing campaign to save the show.  IIRC, when CBS decided to reverse course and put the show back on Monday nights, they waved a white flag outside one of the network's offices to show they had surrendered to the fans, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It was reported (with Nothing is Easy and Hard Copy) as going on hiatus and being replaced by movies on 25th February 1987. However, already on March 3rd it was confirmed it was going back to Mondays. So no, I don't think it was ever cancelled. It might've been if the ratings didn't improve, of course, but it was obvious that they were giving it another shot.

 

Considering Nothing Is Easy and Hard Copy never got to return to the schedule were burnt off as brief fillers on Friday nights, I'd say they were already determined to try and make Designing Women work, but the "fans saved it story" always makes for a good press release.

Edited by te.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

CBS moving Designing women to Sunday @9 was one of the oddest scheduling moves ever.

There must have been some strategy there but to move a new sitcom to the prime Sunday slot during February sweeps seemed odd. And have the following programs a revamped version of a sitcom  that had already flopped and an untried drama ? Sure enough DW was swamped by big movies/mini series from the competition.

Anyone got any insights into that bone headed move?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It seems to me so many moves CBS made in primetime during the second half of the 1980s were to fill space in the schedule because so many new shows they launched were one season and done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

I'm going to include Taxi as a timeslot hit. Not commenting on the quality of the show but purely on a ratings basis.

After debuting in the 78/79 season it finished 9th following 3's Company 2nd.

On 79/80 Taxi was 13th and 3's Company was 2nd.

So after two successful seasons Taxi was given the chance to stand on it's own. For 80/91 ABC moved it to Wed @9 inheriting the Charlies Angels slot (which was fading).

It was paired with Soap but that combo didn't fire. By mid season Taxi was shifted to Thurs @ 9.30 following Barney Miller. Taxi finished outside the Top 30.

It was kept in that slot the following season but as Barney Miller faded, so did Taxi. ABC cancelled it after 4 seasons.

Timeslot Hit!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Members

Too Close for Comfort. Sabotage I guess.

A hit for ABC in the hammock between 3's Company and Hart to Hart. In its second season it showed strength by outraging 3's on occasion.

So ABC decided to move it to Thursday @ 9 to boost that night. But a poor lead in and tough competition in Simon & Simon saw ratings falter. But ABC didn't seem interested in salvaging what was still a newish show that had been Top 10.

Cancelled at the end of its third season.

Edited by Paul Raven
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

With the upcoming Matlock reboot, let’s look at the tank and sabotage job of the original series:

Tank Job:

After 5 seasons as a Top 20 hit on Tuesday nights at 8ET/7/CT, NBC decided to move Matlock to Friday nights in the 8PM slot. The show plunged out of the top 20, top 30, and ended up at #39 for the season. It was also the last season it was on NBC before switching to ABC.

Tank Job #2 and Sabotage:

After 2 seasons in on Thursday nights at 8PM were the show had some success and had at least broken into the Top 30, ABC decided to air Matlock into the 9PM slot for the 1994-95 season following My So Called Life after the initial show McKenna bombed.

The show absolutely met a grisly fate in the ratings, and moving it back to 8PM after My So Called Life ended was the final nail. Basically it foreshadowed the fate of MSW the following season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

1991/92 Tuesday 8 pm Matlock would have been head-to-head w/ Full House at 8 pm and Home Improvement first season at 8:30 pm.  1991/92 Full House got their first Top 10 finish (7th) and Home Improvement was the breakout hit of the season (4th, tied w/ Cheers). Matlock might have barely been a Top 30 show if it remained Tuesday 8 pm.

Correction, it was 1993/94 that ABC moved Matlock to Thursday 9 pm, where it was head-to-head w/ Seinfeld at 9 pm and Frasier first season at 9:30 pm. 1993/94 Seinfeld blew up (going from 25th to 3rd) and Frasier was 7th. Matlock fell out of the Top 30.

Edited by kalbir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks! Looks like it’s time on ABC wasn’t as strong as I thought I remembered. I’m surprised that Matlock didn’t move to CBS along with In the Heat of the Night but it probably would’ve failed there too after a season or two as well. It probably could’ve been paired well with Diagnosis Murder obviously but I’m certain it wouldn’t be the demographics CBS was wanting.

For the record here is Matlock’s ratings by season:

86-87: #15

87-88: #14

88-89: #12

89-90: #20

90-91: #17

91-92: #39 (tied with Primetime Live

92-93: #28 (tied with ABC Sunday Night Movie)

93-94: #35

94-95: #61

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

L.A. Law was NBC's cool and trendy drama once Miami Vice was no longer the new hotness, but Matlock was NBC's highest-rated drama in 1986/87, 1988/89, 1990/91. Matlock was ABC's highest-rated drama in 1992/93.

Edited by kalbir
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I guess RTPP looked worse because it followed Another World, but it's a shame they didn't give it more time especially considering how the shows that were put on following it fared.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Durkin was awful. The writing did her no favors, but she was all wrong for the part, lacking the mix of mystery, steeliness, sorrow and hesitancy that defined Victoria. I still have the awful memory of Adam lugging her around like a rag doll. She looked much more like one of the Blue Whale dancing extras than Victoria. And her voice... Maybe I am too harsh. With that said, Curtis didn't seem as bothered. I see from a fan review mentioning Barnabas & Company that Durkin was asked to return for Victoria's final episodes and declined as she had a Christmas trip to Europe with her husband planned and wasn't interested in just a few appearances.  I refuse to believe Victoria actually died during the Leviathan storyline. If Barnabas and Angelique could come back 8 times, she could come back a few.
    • It's a shame she only appeared in three episodes for the purpose of being written out - I thought she was quite good in the little we saw. I liked her vibe better than Durkin that never seemed to quite capture Victoria as a character.
    • He did a lot of romance novel covers, so that might've just been enough for them to get their panties in a twist.
    • Pre-TGIF, ABC most successful 1980s Friday 8 pm comedy I'd say was Webster. Full House wasn't a hit its first two seasons but it started showing growth in its third season which overlapped with the launch of TGIF. Funny thing is, Full House became a Top 10 show with the 1991/92 move to Tuesday.
    • Oakland Tribune, 14 July 1985   AW is another show with Schenkel at helm By Connie Passalacqua For the most part, dictators of South American banana republics enjoy better reputations than executive producers of daytime soap operas. Total authority is vested in these producers, who can kill off a character (thus firing an actor) with a stroke of a pen, or completely change life in his or her soap opera dominion (both in its fictional locale and backstage at the studio) on any kind of whim.  Most rule despotically, inspiring fear in their actors and writers. Which inevitably surfaces on the screen and subtracts from a show's quality. Then there's Stephen Schenkel who became executive producer of Another World last fall. He's been described by one of his actresses as "a teddy bear." He has noticeably improved the show, mostly because his natural warmth encourages backstage cohesiveness, and he believes in personally nurturing his staff and cast. 'I like to be supportive', he said.' I like to generate a certain amount of enthusiasm. I love actors and writers and technical people. And I like to laugh..  ' Schenkel said that most of the factors that have led to the shows improved ratings existed before he took over. There were well defined characters, outstanding writers and excellent production values, he explains. 'These things were in place but needed to be stimulated. There wasn't a lot of excitement. What really was missing was an adequate story. We added Gillian Spencer as a writer. (she also plays Daisy on All My Children), who's wonderful, and it just coalesced. The writers energy and commitment to the show began to give it an emotional intensity and some real passion within the characters." Schenkel, a former ABC programming executive who helped develop Ryan's Hope, is a strong believer in stressing romantic and comedy elements in soap operas. AW is also one of the only soaps with an established group of comic characters, including Wallingford (Brent Collins) and Lily Mason (Jackee , Harry). Schenkel raves about the talents of all his actors, and even has something good to say about the Brooklyn location of the shows studio, which most of his Manhattan-oriented staff loathe. I like the people here. I like to walk down the street and feel their energies, he said. He also violateda soap opera no-no, ' inviting actors and writers to the same party. "Everyone got to know one another, he said. And I didn't get any complaints about actors ' begging for story lines, he said. 
    • Since it's pride month.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • National City Star-News, 5 May 1977 TV topics by Peter Blazi Lear’s ‘All that Glitters’—doesn’t The best thing that can be said about Norman Lear’s newest soap opera“All That Glitters” is that it comes on so late at night most people will miss it. Role reversal is supposed to be the big draw, with women the breadwinners, mainly executives of a huge conglomerate. The men either fuss with the housework or fidget at the office as secretaries to their bawdy bosses. A female fantasyland? I doubt it. While the role reversal idea has some possibilities, the show pushes too hard for laughs and winds up with raucous females and effete males. A confident, independent woman is indeed a sight to behold and attract, but femininity need not be sacrificed. Unlike Lear’s “Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman,” "Glitters” doesn’t, but you’ve got to give him credit for trying. Today’s experimental comedy is what tomorrow’s hits are made of. Better luck next time, Norman. (“All That Glitters” can be seen weekday evenings at 11 p.m. on Channel 6.) .
    • Actually Kim Zimmer got six weeks off to test the waters for pilot season in L.A. - she said later she went on many auditions and got one offer for a sitcom, but she would one of many in an ensemble. She turned it down, because it wasn't worth leaving Guiding Light for a supporting role on a sitcom. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy