Jump to content

Y&R Fires Entire Breakdown Writing Staff


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 268
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I think Josh's EP title is pretty much a vanity one. He makes extra $$$ and gets some say but I'm sure the other producers are handling the day to day stuff.

I think the COVID measures must have made a huge impact on budget. 

I wonder how Mal Young was on handling the budget? He got rid of Chelsea,Chloe and Kevin and put Neil and Paul on recurring. I don't recall the show looking any worse onscreen .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A day later, after the shock has worn off, I can't help but wonder how this reflects on the management structure at CBS.

Back when CBS daytime had a dedicated VP, with a PR department, do you really think they would have let Griffith give a statement that implied he fired people in order to do the job himself?  Because it is hard to read that headline and not respond negatively.  As much as people dragged former daytime executives, I think they would have spun this to be more palatable, or at least drafted a statement to counteract the unnamed source in The Wrap.

My opinion has mellowed given the knowledge shared by those on this board that other soaps have tried and failed to eliminate this role.  But, it really made me reflect on the idea that (nepo-baby - her father was close with Les Moonves) Amy Reisenbach and Eric Kim who are in charge of all programing at CBS, don't prioritize daytime or the way that it is covered in the media.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would love to know how the whole writing process actually works as this would give us some proper insight into the process.

I would imagine as a headwriter that in addition to long term story, you would map out the week day by day/ scene by scene with details on what the scene was about and key points to be made through dialogue.

Then the dialogue writers would fill that in and as headwriter you would go over that and make any revisions.

So that would pretty much eliminate the need for breakdown writers.

So I can see why they might not be necessary in that scenario. But they have been there for years , so I am unclear how the process works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Miss Alden gave us a "modern look" at the process circa 2005.  It was very convoluted, and Miss Alden made the description far worse by saying "uh, um, uh, um," while she attempted to provide details.  

Basically there's a "story conference" on Monday morning, in which the "head writing team" (who were Miss Latham, Miss Alden, and Jack Smith, at the time) meet with CBS and SONY and present Latham's story projections to the executives.  CBS and SONY either approve or disapprove.  If they approve, go to the next step.  If they disapprove, rework the projections.  

Then Monday afternoon, you meet with the breakdown writers and give them a "broad idea" of the day's script.  The breakdown writers are then assigned a specific script to breakdown further into individual scenes.  

The breakdown writers then submit their completed breakdowns into the "story editor", who at that time was Jack Smith, I believe.  He makes sure the breakdowns line-up with what the "headwriting team" had asked the breakdown writers to do.  Jack Smith would make any necessary edits/changes to the breakdowns, subject to the approval of Miss Latham.  Then the breakdowns would move to the next step -- being approved by CBS and SONY.

Once the breakdowns were approved, they would be assigned to a script writer.  The scriptwriter then completes the script from the breakdown. 

The completed script then came back to Jack Smith, Kay Alden, and Lynn Marie Latham for them to edit/correct/change. 

Once the edits/corrections were made, the script then went to the executive producer, who had the authority to make additional edits/corrections, if for example the script was too LONG or too SHORT or had something in it that the director wouldn't be able to accomplish on screen. 

I'm the ONLY person on the board who feels this way, but I found the entire "breakdown process" to be a ridiculous waste of everyone's time and money; plus Y&R's breakdown writers are obviously not using much creativity to make Josh Griffith's drab stories interesting.  I'm sorry they're losing their jobs, but they were being paid to complete a task that the headwriter and/or the assistant headwriter should theoretically be doing already.      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not so, which is why I'm trying to get aclearer picture of how the process works and why all those levels are necessary.

I think streamlining seems a good idea in theory but Griffith has shown he is incapable of writing interesting, well plotted stories so the whole thing will continue to be a disaster.

My other thought concerns the network execs. Over and over they are accused of micro managing but I would love to know some actual objections.

I would imagine the limited airtime given to the lesbian story is one and in the Sally story the fact that termination isn't even presented as an option.

As for Josh's other stories one can only imagine what might be rejected if they approve of what airs. Maybe it's a blessing in disguise that they interfere.

Also, it would be great if an actor spoke out about the shoddy way the show is written and produced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Angry Dante was hot; sorry, but I'm not going to pretend it wasn't awesome seeing Dominic Zamprogna act his ass off in a way that was not crying.
    • Thanks, interesting and so believable (no Lonatrat or Clones...)Instead of the Lewis family he should have made the Oil family Granger...even if the audience didn't remember that one off character it would have been interesting to tie it into the fictional GL world.
    • Dante needs stick removed from his butt
    • When you bring up what I like to call "Shapiro's Folly" you think Dano's acting choices mattered? I ask because I don't think so. As far as I could tell almost universally the ABC fans hated the very idea of her being on all 4 shows! And, BTW, the headwriters also hated it, at least according to comments made by Passanante. But, it is not hard to imagine that they'd feel that way. And, I agreed. If she wanted success she should have planted "Rae" on one & given up her idea of branding, or whatever it was that she was after.  
    • Okay, well her reasons were that she had a mandate to reduce the size of the cast & she had another mandate to make the cast overall younger, so her reason for picking Donna to off was because she was too old.  So, is that what you understand? Or are you thinking of something else? Which if so, I would be delighted to hear about it!  She had arbitrarily picked 50 as the age people needed to be younger than.  And, that is why she got rid of both Bridget & Spencer Harrison.  And, getting rid of Bridget was another of her horrible ideas.  Why do you refer to her as the Face of the Show? Don't feel bad. I am a major Cass fan & I don't remember him with Donna either, LOL! Can we say forgettable? And, yes, Lila was the most last minute of last minutes!!!! 
    • This is AWESOME, thank you for taking the time to post this! My first thought: My memory is a lot better than I thought it was, LOL! The first episode I clearly remember watching had a scene of Ed confronting Holly about Christina's paternity. He lamented how wonderful things had been over Christmas, so looks like I started watching the show early 1976. The only thing puzzling me is where is Evie? I thought she was around BEFORE Rita got involved with Tim, but maybe that's one gap in my memory. It makes Rita look slightly better--in that case, she didn't seduce Tim knowing her sister had a crush on him.
    • Oh, well.  At least he can cry into his hoodie.
    • Sorry, just realized I'd somehow lost a whole paragraph in that last post.
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  They should have brought Billy back in the early '90s for more drama with Hart and Blake. Maybe Blake would have gotten involved with him to try to ruin him in Roger's eyes, but realize under his sweet nature, Billy was a player himself.
    • Checked. Taggert last date, Wed, 7-19-23, so a long dadgummed time ago.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy