Jump to content

Ratings from the 1990s


kalbir

Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

Both true.  By the late '80s and early '90's, many of the hit shows that had defined CBS -- the nighttime soaps, the Monday night "Ladies' Night" lineup, the action-heavy shows like "Simon & Simon" and "Magnum, P.I." -- were either gone or about to be gone.  Things were looking bleak for the network, with its' only bright spots being its' NFL coverage (which is why losing them at some point during the mid-'90's was considered the biggest blow), its' Sunday night lineup, "Murphy Brown" and maybe "Touched by an Angel."  Then, along came a little show called "C.S.I.," and the rest is over-exposed franchise history lol.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 231
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Agree.  Even before Delta Burke officially left, there were episodes of DW that featured her very little, if at all, and you hardly ever felt the loss.  Conversely, Jean Smart's departure really left a hole that the show never came close to filling.

 

To this day, I contend that "The Nanny" was extremely lucky to be on a network that was desperate even for a modest hit.

 

ELR is that rare hit show that nobody ever claims to have watched, lol.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly.  I didn't get it either.

Remember, too, that was also the period when CBS believed David Letterman could topple "The Tonight Show" before they realized he couldn't.

In retrospect, I think they should have courted Arsenio Hall instead, as he was the only one who gave Carson a serious run for his bucks.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not sure CBS audiences, then or now, could've handled that.

I will say this: I vividly remember Arsenio being clowned left, right and center in those years by everyone for being a sycophant and what not, especially In Living Color, etc. But he was a force in late night in that era and he was as integral at the time as Letterman, Carson/Leno, etc. I also always appreciated his alleged insistence musical acts perform live, which led to some crazy showstoppers like the MC Hammer appearance (look it up!). And compared to Jimmy Fallon his interviews look like Diane Sawyer. The way people forgot about him or erased him from the history for a lot of years, maybe until very recently, never sat well with me. I always liked him.

I just remember years of column inches devoted to trying to sell us on Patricia Heaton, Doris Roberts, etc. being the second coming of like Mary Tyler Moore's cast and I did not get it. They had a huge sendoff too. And where is it today? It's not doing Seinfeld numbers online.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It never sat well with me either.

Look, I'm not saying I was a diehard Arsenio fan -- for God's sake, I was probably the only one who liked "The Pat Sajak Show"! -- but I believe in giving the devil his due.  Arsenio's show provided the first, real platform to a demographic (young and urban) that late-night had never served before.  In doing so, he also did the impossible: he made Johnny Carson blink.  (And don't tell me Arsenio had nothing at all to do with Johnny's retirement.  I know better.  Johnny saw the writing on the wall, so he got off the stage before he got carried off.  Period.)

Again, a person of color forever alters the television landscape -- I mean, was a late-night with hip-hop influences and without Carson even fathomable before '92? -- but in the official oral and written histories, he gets nary a mention.  Same [!@#$%^&*], different day.

Which is ironic, since Phil Rosenthal designed ELR as the kind of sitcom you could see being rerun on Nick-at-Nite for an eternity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The oral history of "The Arsenio Hall Show," and its' impact, not just on late-night TV, but on pop-culture in general, is another book that's still waiting to be written.

True.  However, the takeaway here is that, whatever his faults, Arsenio Hall still managed to shake up a part of the TV landscape that, up to that point, had been controlled by one (white, older, conservative) man in particular.  Johnny Carson held almost a death-grip on late-night; Arsenio was the one who pried loose some of his fingers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sorry if this takes the discussion even further off-topic, but could you imagine Johnny Carson courting the urban demographic like Arsenio Hall did?  I mean, I just can't see him bringing on, say, Naughty by Nature or Soundgarden without doubling over with laughter, lol.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • “I’m not a lifelong soap fan, but I sure am now,” Wolf tells PEOPLE about creating the documentary Soaps, which includes deep dives into the biggest and most successful soap operas in the industry, with a strong focus on The Bold and the Beautiful. “It reflects, in a broader way, the cultural significance of soap operas and the incredible task involved in bringing these stories to the screen every day.”
    • I have this for the 4th act on 11/9/88, which per my files, is the first time John and Stefano are in a scene together: Limo (Roman, Diana, Stefano, Milo) Then their second time together is 11/17/88 in the second-to-last act: ON LOCATION: Beach & Cliff (Diana, Roman, Stefano) I'd have to check the 2016 logs, so I don't know who shares scenes as easily in this year, but these are the last 4 episodes that John and Stefano were both in together: 1/8/16, 1/11/16, 3/1/16, 3/2/16.
    • I'm going to respond to you about this show. I've been accused of hating on it for some reason or another. But as a 53-year-old black man I do not hate this show at all. It heavily represents people like me, but I want it to be treated well and not just pushed with half-assedness, which is what I feel has happened on several occasions so far. Bad editing, bad cliffhangers, or no cliffhangers at all, disappearing characters with dropped storylines, etc. I can understand shows no longer wanting certain characters or  storylines, but why the "Judy Winslow" effect? I'm really finding it weird that Jacob doesn't mention his father or his detective partner. Jacob was smack dab in the middle of them both.
    • I love many things about BTG very much. For me, it's greatest strength is how the family relationships are so beautifully written. The deep love between family members while acknowledging each other's flaws--it's SO GOOD.  The best of the best is the two sister relationships: loving but very different sisters Dani and Nicole and adversarial sisters Kat and Eva. These two relationships can anchor the show for many years to come, in my opinion. (The one caveat is that the young and very talented Colby and Ambyr may want to leave the show sooner rather than later, but that's to be expected). My biggest problem with this show is this: Where are the romantic love stories? Where are the star-crossed lovers? Almost every character on this show is married, or in a committed relationship, or just fooling around. Right now the only potential for this are in the Ashley/Andre/Derek and Kat/Tomas/Eva situations. Like a lot of people, I feel the sooner they ditch Ashley and Derek, the better. I hate picking on actors, but the characters are so blah and bland it's like they're a parody of soap characters. I like Andre, and there's some indication they might have him become more serious about Dani, but I don't see that becoming a big love story. I could be wrong. Kat and Eva fighting over a man would be amazing. Over Tomas? No.  I've noticed on social media some people are starting to ship Kat and Jacob. I think that shows how much viewers long for a messy love story. There is much I enjoy about BTG and I have no intention of bailing on it. But over all my many years of watching soap operas, the thing that always got me the most excited about them was the question: "When are those two finally going to get together?"
    • FROM THE VAULT: WEEKLY DAYTIME NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEKS OF 11/26/73-11/30/73 & 12/3/73-12/7/73:

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

        Some initial thoughts.   1) a Who's who back in the day with an assortment of well known performers. 2) Surprised Debra Messing would agree to play a conservative character 3) Not surprised a network didn't pick this up because showing a conservative that is human/likable is a no no in Hollywood LOL
    • Yes from when they went on Let’s Make a Deal too. Pam stole Forrester designs for Jackie M. Of course a month later we saw Nick, Lesley, Owen, and Bridget all exit in the same episode.
    • Great pairing that seemed to come out of the blue! Around that time, it felt like Sheffer/Goutman didn’t really know what to do with Emily or Hal. And KM and BH had surprisingly great chemistry. It was good for Emily especially because she was coming off those unsympathetic years with the Tom affair and then running the Intruder and essentially just being a busybody.
    • I think the issue with Lulu is less the character (which was the issue in the Julie Berman days under Guza II) and more the lack of nuance. The current GH team rarely writes nuance for any character or at least can't sustain it for long, or they reserve it for a favored few. I also think the rooting interest at GH BTS often remains on preferred characters or actors - BLQ/Setton - vs. Laura's kids. So it's easy to make Lulu the heavy if you think Brook Lynn and Chase are the money on this show. I don't, but I think FV does. And that's not to say I think Amanda Setton is bad in the role, or that I would get rid of BLQ. I don't trend towards either (though I do think that if Setton's personal beliefs keep getting in the way of material I would reluctantly recast). I think Brook Lynn is essential to use as a lead presently. But I don't think it needs to be the black and white dichotomy of suffering young matriarch BLQ and aggressor Lulu. While it's good that unlike in the Guza years they can recognize that Lulu can be obnoxious and rash, can be her own worst enemy and that that is part of the character, it can be toned down or given more layers than it has of late. There's nothing wrong there the writing can't fix.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy