Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Agree.  But, hey, I guess bringing up old [!@#$%^&*] with Kim Cattrall is a lot less work than putting out an actual, decent show!

It ain't 2001 anymore.  Kim Cattrall has moved on.  Darren Star has moved on.  The majority of us who once gaf about anything regarding these folks have moved on.  It's only the fading SJP and her posse who can't or won't give up the proverbial ghost.  So what do those idiots do?  They come up with this show.  This shitty show that, IMO, has done more to ruin the overall SATC brand than the two movies COMBINED.

I'm sure all the delusional queens out there who actually think life was better when Dubya was still president love revisiting these narcissistic bitches; but, like I said, the rest of us have moved on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
  • Members

I've seen people say she needs to move on, but she isn't the one keeping this going. She can rant all day as far as I'm concerned. The show and the people involved with it can eat [!@#$%^&*]. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She sounds very self possessed in that interview and I do believe her when she says that, although she loved playing Samantha in the original SATC series, she’s moved on.

I have seen her in other things after the original series ended and thought she was great in just about all I saw her in.

While I was reading this interview, I couldn’t help but think how I would like to see her in something with her Mannequin co-star Andrew McCarthy (I know, random, right?) Maybe they could play a married couple in that sitcom she was thinking about.

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I do not agree. She doesn't have the right to rant. Sarah and Michael have done nothing, but respect her. She has been kicking this dead horse and craving attention for years and years now. Her passive aggressive liking twitter comments that hate on the show... staying silent, then making comments like this... And I just pray the public stop with this WE WANT SAMANTHA back nonsense. Samantha is a character that will NEVER work now. And Just Like that IS NOT SEX AND THE CITY,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • That's a bit murky since that happened during a writers' strike. Assuming Kristen Marie had a 2-year contract she left about when her contract would have expired and Sharlene and Josie showed up right before that. Lemay was officially credited as HW from September 1988 but it seems very probable that his anticipated tenure influenced events that happened during the strike which started in April. 
    • I've seen so many posters over the years who are bright, creative, well-versed in soap history, and who care deeply about the integrity of the genre. I'd put the shows' chances in their hands a lot faster than I would allow any of the "usual suspects" to take control of the dramas they've already helped decimate. When I returned to university in the 1980s, I created a bible for a new soap and presented it in my screenwriting class. It was in reaction to how badly I saw the network shows being butchered at the time. The creative process was thrilling; a total joy, and I still smile when I remember the positive feedback I received from the professor and my fellow students. I was used to seeing written commentary from professors on my work. This one wrote me a long, complimentary note on the final page of the bible, but also graded it 97%, A+. I was beaming ear to ear for days!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thanks. I do wonder if Rose was meant to be more given the caliber of actress they hired. I remembered Sara and Peggy staying longer as they were still on when Soapnet started their repeats. I wonder if that was part of the reason they brought Jake's brother in. 
    • Speculation about Missy Reeves' potential evolution on basic civil rights doesn’t change my opinion of her. My view is shaped entirely by her public social media presence—which I find unpalatable—and I have no interest in learning more beyond that. I simply liked Jennifer’s hair and dress. That’s as far as my admiration goes.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy