Jump to content

Any Bias in the Business Of Reboots?


DramatistDreamer

Recommended Posts

  • Members

In the Soaps preview thread, I was just watching some heartwarming video of Bryton James and Telma Hopkins discussing Hopkins' appearance on Y&R and they were asked about the possibility of a Family Matters reunion and both seemed hopeful for a future reunion but clearly there was nothing in production or even pre-production, which made me wonder what were the last highly popular and we'll known sitcoms with a majority Black cast to get a reboot?

Some may cite The Game and House Of Payne, but to me, neither one achieved the type of mass appeal that A Different World or a Family Matters got. Neither have those shows been a part of the broadcast cultural lexicon in the way that a Living Single or A Girlfriends or an In Living Color has been. I'd even rank The Game and House Of Payne below Sister Sister.

 

On the other hand, we've seen Full House, Punky Brewster and other shows get the reboot treatment with expectation that Sex And The City is soon to follow. They could only get a Friends reunion special, when we all know they wanted a reboot, but the reunion has had a ton of promotion, which I completely understand. It just seems like there is a disparity between the shows that get offers to reboot versus those that do not.

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Sanford is probably the first example of a successful black sitcom getting a reboot, but that didn't last long at all and failed to get the attention that Sanford and Son did. Then there was What's Happening Now!! and one could say that What's Happening!! was moderately successful. With that said both of those revivals where in the 80s so there really has been no successful black sitcom that has received a reboot in recent times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Yeah, that's exactly what I meant, that tptb wanted a reboot but had to settle for a reunion special because that was all they could get. For years, the actors turned down any and all offers that would be a reboot or a retrospective. I was surprised that they even said yes to a reunion this time around.

 

 

 

I probably should have been clearer about the time period because I definitely meant l, in the last three or four years. I strain to remember shows featuring a majority Black or POC cast that have gotten more than a video on Entertainment Weekly:s social media platform. I only just found out that House Of Payne got a reboot, then again, I have only ever watched one episode of that show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Living Single supposedly had a hold-up with one of the cast before they could get going, and Kim Coles said it "wasn't who people think". That's all I know there, but I wouldn't be at all surprised if the networks also slow-walked it out of racial bias. NY Undercover almost had a big revival with Malik Yoba and Lauren Velez back, but the network passed.

 

OTOH, I think the only thing keeping A Different World off the revival slate is Cosby sadly refusing to relinquish an onscreen name credit.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I have been thinking about ADW  in terms of why they have had no reboot despite massive public interest and I think it is likely because NBCU or the other producers don't want to go to court, if Cosby is indeed the issue. Bill Cosby, a convicted sex offender would have a tough time keeping control of ADW if other producers truly wanted to fight him in litigation. Harvey Weinstein legally had his company wrested away from him eventually, so if it came down to a court battle, Cosby would have a decent chance of losing. It seems like a lack of will on behalf of the other producers, who may not see it as worth the effort, as hard as it may seem to believe by the rest of us.

 

I often think of the fact that most of these sitcoms with minority majority casts had smaller budgets, less promotion and usually went off the air with little fanfare or media recognition. It reminded me of the time when Black movies were said to be unappealing to 'mainstream' audiences and therefore undeserving of larger budgets for production, promotion, etc. as they would only underperform--until they didn't, consistently.

 

I once had a screenwriter/professor tell me that a movie with two Black leads couldn't get greenlit because it was assumed that the movie wouldn't "sell".  I hope those days are over in the film business but I wouldn't be surprised if that bias still existed in network television.

Insecure is approaching its final season, so we'll see how that send-off happens. It could be an indicator of what, if anything has changed on the landscape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, ok, got it. Black shows have definitely not been a part of the reboot wave. House of Payne only got a reboot because Tyler Perry can shoot at his own studio and reduce the costs to BET.

 

There are fewer black sitcoms on the air now than there were in the past four decades so a degree of bias does still exist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I believe another poster indicated Debbie Allen said as much in the ADW thread. I do hope it happens eventually. I believe Issa Rae was part of the push for a revival alongside Allen.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think there is a plethora of material to pull from, it may just be the cast members who are holding them up (in addition to the perceived belief that there is a lack of demand for the properties itself). The top ones that come to mind to me are: 

 

  • Fresh Prince of Bel Air 
  • In The House 
  • The Jaime Foxx Show 
  • The Parent Hood
  • Hanging with Mr. Cooper
  • Smart Guy
  • Martin
  • The Wayan's Brothers
  • Kenan & Kel
  • The Steve Harvey Show
  • The Parkers
  • Moesha

In addition to the giants of Sister Sister, Living Single, and A Different World.

 

Part of the issue to me may be that the sitcoms in general are so heavily nested in one tv personality, and they may have other projects or may not want to return to the previous roles which basically takes the selling power away from the project (Brandy, Steve Harvey, Will Smith, etc.). 

 

I mean pretty much every single television series listed comes from a cult of personality comedian or actor that was central to the success of the series, and it's less of an ensemble and more of a showcase of that individuals specific talents, which launched them to future success.  It's a little like trying to cast a Mary-Kate and Ashley television series, when they no longer want to act anymore, because they are the reason for the built-in audience. Sex and the City 3 was halted for years because Kim Cattral refused to be Samantha anymore. I can imagine these properties would struggle in the same way given the weight of these characters and the impact to the series.

 

I think the main reason why some of these actors are less likely to do reboots is because they may see it as taking away from the new work, new business or new property that could extend their shelf-life in the business. For instance Will Smith and Jamie Foxx could likely land other shows, that would pay them for their name recognition. So they would want to focus on their new projects instead of retreading old properties. Instead of reinvesting their legacy shows, they instead want to branch out and establish new ones to keep a steady stream of work. I think the addition of streaming plays a role in this too. Actors have more opportunities than they used to with network or cable television productions. Now with streaming they have more work to audition for, so you can see them doing multi-modal forms of acting with television, film and streaming all at once. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'd trade all of those listed above for a reboot of ADW tbh. It's easily the most relevant and impactful. 

Bryton expressed the hope that something could be done with Family Matters and from what I have read everyone else in the cast is also on board. I just don't think there are any takers, in terms of production and distribution outfits.

 

When you look at budget for many of these shows, the shows with minority majority casts were always expected to do more with less. Living Single, a frontrunner and inspiration for Friends, had a much smaller budget, less promotion and smaller salaries despite having Kim Fields and Queen Latifah who were well-known entities by then. So, if the actors don't want to return because the "money's funny", then I don't blame them. They got screwed before, they're not up for that again.

 

How Insecure ends will be even more of a litmus test, in terms of whether the industry really has evolved or not.

 

I have to amend what I said about FM, there don't seem to be takers so far

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know this isn’t a usual or anywhere near universal take, but I loved the relatively brief Hal/Emily relationship/marriage more than I ever thought I would have with KMH/BH.
    • In my field (not that) I've written my share of dreck when it's what people wanted vs. something good. In the end what matters is the check. These pilots may not be great, but whether or not those writers intended otherwise they got paid.
    • I think there is plenty to critique and/or roast about the show, but I think there's also good bones and a lot of progressive improvement. It's the Bell/B&B formula and house style that is hardest for it to shake and the most necessary IMO, as well as some dead weight actors or characters, but that formula also apparently works for a lot of general viewers and I suspect CBS. OTOH it's also very modern in certain ways (sometimes overly hip dialogue, and some story) that still make it feel like a show that's bouncing between distant past staples of soap opera fundamentals and the present moment. And the old fashioned product placement is fun but also so goofy, while material like June is hysterical. Imagine leading with 'the underpass is where I live, and I like it there!' It's an unusual show in that way, because its identity and tone is still not fully formed. You don't know what it'll be. But that's normal at this juncture. The closest thing to a glimpse of the future foundation, I think (besides the obvious core family setup that's been there since Day 1), is the rivalry and future familial bond - and likely love/hate relationship - between Kat and Eva. A la many central sisters or siblings throughout soap history.
    • I loved Kelley Menighan! She was an MVP, especially during the show’s last few years. I always looked forward to anything she did with MM, BH, CZ, MW,  and the two grownup Alisons. Wasn’t a big fan of her with RH’s Paul. I always admired how she balanced being a vixen and being neurotic.
    • LLC can be a lot (lady definitely doesn’t phone it in), but her scenes with Rena made me wish they played actual sisters on a better platform.  Aside from JE, who is a legend so it’s no surprise when she’s excellent, Amanda Setton is my MVP of this story and she hasn’t always been great in this role. You see so much happening in her face as she’s navigating the shifts and layers of this story. She’s fully locked in. Glad Rory Gibson is getting his due on GH. I knew he had more to give than what Y&R was giving him. The writing will be a factor here as well because the character of Michael hasn’t been written well in ages (if ever, arguably). GH just can’t sustain the good stuff for more than a few weeks. Alexa Havins is a very good actress and was widely embraced as Lulu initially, but the character’s one-note abrasiveness has a lot of folks wishing she was gone at this point. 
    • It's pilots like "Hurricane Sam" and "Anything for Love" that makes me so afraid to write professionally, because, my God, what if I actually tried and came up with something just as awful, if not worse (if that's even possible)?
    • JANUARY 1974 SPECIALS ADDED... Here are the January 1974 specials which have been added to the yearly list on page 76:

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Wow, you have the patience of a saint watching through this period. I think the show does get better but it takes a while.  I won't give any spoilers about Zachary, but I will drop a slight hint: GL was probably trying to get a ratings boost by doing a story inspired by one of CBS's few primetime hits in the mid-1990s. And no, Zachary does not turn out to be a Texas ranger. 
    • Love makes everything possible.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

         
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy