Jump to content

Avengers: Age of Ultron


Cheap21

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'm not familiar with the character. I love the comic/sip hero movies but I was never into comic books. So I can't make a judgement on how she "should" look based on that, but I can say that IMO she looks great and I can't wait to see what she brings to the franchise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There's various interpretations of the character and they have chosen to do one which you may not agree with. I think you need to let go of your preconceived notions of what she should be and look at her for who she is. You never know as she/they just might surprise you

I felt a similar type of way with the casting of SJ as Black Widow but she ended up being one of the best thing about the first film. Im very excited to see MO as Scarlet Witch and the glimpse in TWS and now this give me good hope

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Scarlet Witch was a character any soap fan could love. In the very early 70s the writers started using her to tell serialized stories apart from the usual super adventures. I remember first she fell in love with a synthetic man only to find her brother couldn't accept that and refused to talk to her, then the synthetic man who had no emotions fell in love with her but felt he was unworthy of her for the longest time. When he finally realized he could love he got tempted by another woman. Then they got married and had kids, but he developed amnesia and her kids were killed when it turned out they were not really her kids after all but magical illusions used against her. Then the amnesiatic synthetic husband couldn't love her anymore like she wanted.

Then years later it looked like the woman who tried to steal her husband returned with her suddenly not dead kids out for revenge and all grown up. Anytime The Avengers had a big story and they needed a human element to personalize the story, they would always use the Scarlet Witch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well said. I could tell a dozen stories about why I loved the character when I read Marvel comics, but this is for the movie and nobody wants to hear that. I will say the best part of her was the contrast between a woman who was both polite and kind yet also blunt and sarcastic and extremely powerful - so powerful she was very afraid of what she might do or be and it took years before she really began to test her limits.

One of my favorite scenes was when Steve and Tony were arguing and she hexed a chair right between them, then told them, essentially, that no one had time for their macho bullshit, serious things were going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the Scarlet Witch is a really fascinating character. But I never trusted her as a hero.

This woman literally made up her own children out of magic, convinced herself they were real and then they got wished out of existence. The minute I saw that (and her many other turns to the dark side) I thought she was nuts and that the Avengers were crazy to trust their lives to her, and this was when I was little, like 25 years ago. But she's a fascinating character, because for so many reasons the Witch is always on that knife's edge between self-loathing mutanthood and all her neuroses and pathology, both from her father and from her weird upbringing and her godlike powers. She wants to do right but she often doesn't do it. She is torn between the human man and a machine she truly wants, between being a mutant and one of America's premiere heroes, the abandoned daughter of a terrorist, a black magician, etc etc.

When Brian Michael Bendis posited that Wanda had lost her mind and gone berserk in the 2000s to disassemble the Avengers, I could take issue with the continuity for the story (re: Wanda's memories and such) and the characterizations in his storyline, which Bendis has never bothered much with beyond his own very selective interpretation. But the twist itself? I completely believed it. As a Marvel fan for most of my life, I was amazed it had not happened sooner. Wanda is a time bomb, she always has been.

I am glad they have fixed the character up and brought her back into the fold, but to me she remains very dicey psychologically. Which is really one of the cornerstones of so many classic Marvel heroes. Elizabeth Olsen played this sort of character perfectly in so many of her films, especially Martha Marcy May Marlene, so I think she is a perfect choice for the role. (I also really doubt that is her final outfit; it's just a skirt and a jacket.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I haven't followed her in over 20 years but when I think of her, I think of stuff like this:

1t241y.jpg

which has been choreographed like your typical soap scene with she watching her man fall for another woman.

and then to keep it soapy the mantrap tried to reel him in

15485qo.jpg

And it is stories like that that is what made Wanda fun years ago, not her crazy powers. They were able to tell all kinds of soap opera stories about her that they could never do with more famous and established characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I never got the point of giving them children in the first place, but there were other ways to get out of it. I don't think she or The Vision (who was dissolved and put into that boring white form because the theme of the Marvel of the late 80s was tearing down and tearing down, even if the result was never as interesting as what had been before) ever recovered as characters. I never bought any of that stuff. The whole, "she's going crazy cause she can't have her babeeez!" material is not for me. I'm not going to act like she was ever this big feminist heroine, but she was not a baby hungry lunatic who had to be protected from herself by everyone around her or else she would go on a killing spree. There are shades of gray which most of the writing never tried to touch, unfortunately.

The Mantis story was such hilariously cheesy soap opera, one where you could see the old romance comics background of many of the writers still with the company at the time. I think she and Mantis got in a catfight at one point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I hope it's okay to post this here(as in from DC)  
    • Quick question - did Christie and Leann share any scenes together in the '80s before Leann left the show?
    • This is the perfect way to encapsulate the situation. So many morally-reprehensible stories were foisted on the show and its characters in ATWT's dwindling years. Rape should never be used as a cheap plot device or in a way that degrades the victim. Jack's sexual assault was another heinous example of how nasty the the show's tone had become. The fact that people like Hogan Sheffer, Ron Carlivati, Jean Passanante, Charles Pratt, Dena Higley, etc., somehow end up winning awards for their material, decimates the credibility and integrity of the awards, IMHO. Soaps used to have a solid moral core and did not originally wallow in the gutter, rolling around in filth and depravity just to be cool, hip, campy, or whatever else modern-day PTB aim for. Thank you. Cruelty, degradation and misogyny are not components which lend themselves to successful soaps, which have always been predicated on warmth, family bonds, and providing a comforting haven for their audience. The genre has been crippled because the cynical and ignorant executives in charge understand neither the shows nor what the audience wants to see.
    • Beverlee was on a whole other level from Kim. It's not like they were in competition with each other. I get the feeling that Kim had a slight problem with the super-professional, serious cast members who just wanted everyone to be prepared and do the work, as she seems to like having fun on set. (She's made a few cracks about Chris Bernau being like that). Bev was definitely one of those. But they didn't work together that much. Yeah, they made her manic and also much weaker. She always had a vulnerability, but wanting to kill herself over that guy? No way. Not only that, he didn't leave her! She insisted he marry Maeve. When they did the tribute to Bert/Charita, the compilation of scenes with her showed how much the cast had been almost totally turned over in a relatively short period of time. Nearly every shot was of her by herself because most people she had worked with had been fired, left or been replaced. I assume they couldn't show her with people who hadn't been replaced, like Don Stewart, Elvera Roussel, or Robert Newman because they would have had to pay them for using their clips. It's dreadful to watch. Like she had no connection to the current show.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • A little too much focus on Chad and Cat today but I enjoyed the episode. I have a feeling that Jennifer’s gonna get dumped on though, even though I think that her anger is completely understandable and justified. And honestly, Ron is finally gone; Abigail can come back now.  But, welcome back, Anna! It was nice seeing Carrie have scenes with her mother. Christie Clark and Leann Hunley have never really had that many scenes together and to see them have them now is really nice. I’m glad that both of them were there to comfort Marlena too. Their words were definitely the thing that Marlena needed to hear. Btw, with all this talk of Noah, does it mean that he’s gonna be introduced soon? Amy, revealing that John changed her flat tire many years ago seemed a little random though. I would rather she have said something about how everybody in Salem knows of John Black because of how he was always such a hero. But at the same time, her story also showed what a great guy John was.  I liked Kate’s scenes with Philip too, and her promise to get back at Xander for what he did. And since we didn’t see JPL in the bed, did he need some time off or something? And yeah, everything involving ‘One Stormy Night’ still seems very Ron-like to me.
    • The second photo featuring the late John Spencer is from the Law & Order episode, "Prescription For Death", which was the (second) pilot/first episode all the way back in 1990! He played the father of a daughter that had gone to the ER for a mere sore throat but ended up dead because the doctor on call was drunk and had given her medication that she had an adverse reaction to, after receiving some other medication. So, he will always have that great distinction in addition to The West Wing. (The first pilot, "Everybody's Favorite Bagman", was filmed in 1988! The show was offered to CBS, but they passed. In syndication, it is oddly placed as the sixth episode of Season 1. And Roy Thinnes played DA Alfred Wentworth there. When NBC picked up the show two years later, Thinnes declined to return, and that's how we got Steven Hill's DA Adam Schiff.)
    • exactly. I can understand schadenfreude if it were real, but a lot of this is just an engineered distraction.
    • Days of our Lives S60E204 – Thursday, June 5, 2025 Okay, today’s episode was kind of boring. It was nice seeing Jack and Jen back, but they wasted an entire episode on Jen chatting with Julie - one scene would’ve been enough. Also, why didn’t Jack and Jen go comfort Marlena? And wouldn’t a flashback with Jack, Jen, and John have been great? Maybe something from the Cruise of Deception era? Bottom line - it feels like once John’s memorial is over and the returning fan favorites leave Salem… the show’s going to be dull again.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy