Jump to content

HBO's Looking


John

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Yes i agree that it was not edgy enough and every time it looked like a sex scene, they cut. Do they know they are on HBO? Of course it's only the first episode but i was disapointed. I know HBO is much more PG that Showtime (Queer as Folk...Masters of Sex) or Cinnemax (soft core porn movies almost every night ) but I hope it gets a little better. Even Sex and the City had semi-good sex scenes.

They need to take it up a notch or this show isn't going to be going on for very long. Time will tell....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 498
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

HBO vs Showtime is weird when it comes to sex. Showtime has more overall nudity--however, they rarely show full frontal and never have (that I know of) shown full frontal male, both of which HBO does (well not enough of the male...) QAF was actually pretty tame nudity wise (the early episodes had a lot less than the UK series.)

I think they could have more (and apparently they will, from what critics have said--certainly Weekend had a ton.) But I am a bit surprised given the potential audience they didn't force it on the pilot. At the same time it is kinda telling--and must be frustrating for anyone involved in launching a new "gay" show--that much of the gay press is split between it focuing way way way too much on sex, or not enough. It's practically down the middle. (I frankly still don't know why Showtime didn't buy into the audience they had with QAF by launching another gay drama...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
I think people have that opinion because of OZ, the series based on the maximum security prison that was on before The Sopranos, Sex and the City and Six Feet Under took over HBO and in became the darlings of media critics.

That series, during that time (1997 - 2003) was the only program on cable that featured stories about sex between two men (be it rape or consensual) and they had one of the very first love stories between two men on screen (Beecher and Keller), even though it was a highly dysfunctional relationship throughout the series. They also had full frontal male nudity and gay characters.

I do think that Showtime had other programs on their network (Beggars and Choosers and Brothers) that had gay characters, but those shows were pretty tame in comparison to OZ.

Edited by difficultdiva
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh don't get me wrong Hannah went somewhere kinda dark last half of the second season but even as she was doing the infamous ear scene I was absolutely hypnotized and a sick sort of way I found it hilarious. And I think the main problem for me is again the characters themselves don't stick out in any sort of way. Like I barely tell one from other other. With Girls you could tell each of the main 4 had their own personality and hiccups. They each popped on screen for me in different ways.

Its kinda sad that I found the older woman who lives with the older guy of the trio the most memorable and engaging. The rest just seemed to be sitting there like paint just drying...

The scene on the subway should have been magical....like Brian/Justin in QaF (and I'm not talking about the sex part I'm saying chemistry wise) but it just felt very bland/ordinary. I know its a new show but from the previews, etc its clear that they're supposed to be the one major couple of the season and it just didn't seem like there was much spark there.

I'll def watch the second episode but I'm not really hardcore excited about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love the nurse/doctor lady--I love the actress regardless,buther conversation felt real to me (not a typical fag hag even though she had dated him--obviously not still hung up on him ala QAF).

To be honest, your opinion makes sense--we just disagree. I thought the bus scene felt realistic to my experiences--I didn't want a QAF moment. (But, as everyone on here knows, as much as I loved the UK QAF--it blew me away when it first aired and I was still in high school--the US one, which I kinda watched anyway because my friends all did, greatly annoyed me.) The critics whohave loved it (and it does have a very high metacritic score) have said that it doesn't really find itself till episode 3. For an 8 episode, 30 minute show that may be too slow--they really should have atleast premiered the first two together I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm glad ;) I appreciate that many people--people whose opinions I respect--love the US/Canadian QAF. I've noticed most of them didn't see the original till after (there are comments on Amazon that complain about the original how ugly the actors are and the sex is toned down. I guess I prefer somewhat realistic looking men who can act, and the sex was actually more graphic but also more realistic--no MTV montages, so...)

The second episode airs this week, its the third episode (and 6th I think of Girls?) that airs the sat before the Superbowl, though they will repeat it Sunday. I think that makes sense--I hate when they take a break (and for an 8 episode series that's pretty deadly--interesting the UK original QAF was, I think, 8 30 minute episodes as well.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As to the low ratings, while I think they will climb for episode two due to all the social media attention (but of course, after that, depending on what people think, fall again) they did do better than recent 30 minute HBO series that didn't have Game of Thrones on at the same night. And to put it in perspective, when ratings (even on cable) were larger, I found this about QAF.

"Showtime’s “Queer as Folk” proved there was an audience for later gay-themed entertainment like “Queer Eye for the Straight Guy,” “The L Word” and the recently launched cable network Logo.
But in its final season, “Folk” has lost most of that audience. Ratings for the once-hip show have fallen by more than half since its 2000 debut, and it’s in the midst of its worst year ever.
Through July 10, the most recent data available, new “Folk” episodes are averaging a 0.30 household rating, according to Nielsen numbers provided by Magna Global USA. That’s down 12 percent from last year’s 0.34 average.
It’s off 57 percent from the show’s third-season average of 0.7, and down 66 percent from 2000-2001’s premiere season average of 0.87.
Most shows fade somewhat by their fifth season, but why the steep dropoff for “Folk,” which has remained in the same Sunday 10 p.m. timeslot and enjoyed lots of press coverage for its sex-soaked storylines?
Actually, it may be because of those storylines. A year after gay marriage was a critical, and very divisive, issue in the 2004 election, a show like “Folk” was bound to slip.
While “Queer Eye” and “Will &Grace” play gay for laughs, “Folk” stays serious and issue-oriented, with the gay marriage debate showing up in this year’s storylines. And that may be too much for formerly casual viewers to take.
“Look at where the gay community was five years ago and what's happened since the election,” “Folk” writer-producer Daniel Lipman told the Associated Press during last week’s Showtime Television Critics Association presentation.
With gays feeling increasing scrutiny over gay marriage and adoption, some homosexual viewers may have become exasperated with the promiscuity of several “Folk” characters, not wanting to watch a show that some say enforces stereotypes."

http://www.medialifemagazine.com:8080/News2005/jul05/jul18/3_wed/news4wednesday.html

(I love how they didn't mention that people maybe just got tired of how increasingly ridiculous QAF's stories got as being a reason... And the fact that five years, even if the show were great, is around when viewers really drop off for most cable shows.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks for finding and posting that article about the ratings for QAFUS. I recall that the show had steadily lost viewers over time.

The storylines did become ridiculous on QAF after awhile, because I think the show's creators were just treading water until the series finally ended. The actors portraying Brian and Justin at that time were certainly done (in their minds and in their portrayals of their characters) by the beginning of the fifth and final season.

I do think it's interesting that some of the initial selling of "Looking" in the media chose to use "Girls" and "Sex and the City" as the barometer instead of QAFUS. I wonder why that was the case?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Same for me. :-) I still recall the first episode of QAFUK and how those characters came across to me as people that you could meet in real life AND I really liked the fact that none of them were out of this world pretty. I found Stuart Alan Jones to be very charismatic, even though he was violatile, hard to deal with at times and didn't want anyone to know that he actually cared about folks (especially Vincent) in his life. I also loved how Stuart seemed to enjoy sex and how he was able to "pull" the guys he met each night. It didn't seem like some burden that his US counterpart had to face, because he (Brian Kinney) was seen and deemed as this "sex god".

I was fortunate to watch QAFUK when it initially aired and even with it only being 8 thirty minute episodes, they steadily grew an audience in the UK (with gay male and to their surprise female audiences) and gained critical acclaim in the UK and US. Entertainment Weekly wrote an article up about the series at that time and said that it was the best "cult show that nobody in the US could watch", unless they knew of somebody in the UK who could pirate them copies of the show. If QAFUK hadn't been created, who knows if Aiden Gillen or Charlie Hunnan would have been cast in US series "The Wire" or "Sons of Anarchy".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So far, I think the most likeable character is the latino dude the main dude met on the train, and if tonight's episode is any indication, looks like that may be the last we see of him. That's too bad, and again, it's still very early, but I don't find any of the main characters particularly likeable/"rootable".

The black guy in the relationship with latino guy reminds me of Roger G. Smith and Craig David.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought the first scene's dialogue was a bit much, but then I thought about how comically raunchy my straight, gay, female friends can be in conversation. Maybe there was something about the fact that it was scripted with a healthy dose of intentional shock value that rubbed me wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wasn't shocked by that conversation between those three characters. They are supposed to have a long history with each other and friends do talk that way to each other about things going on in their lives.

Patrick and his issues, yet again got the best of him and he screwed up on his date with Ritchie. I still don't think it's the last we'll see from him, but I think he just didn't want to be "uncut Latino meat" to Patrick.

Dom's ex certainly proved that even a recover meth head could still be a user and jerk.

I love how supportive Agustin's boyfriend is about his art. I feel that Agustin thinks that he shouldn't want to enjoy spending time at home, eating pizza with his man, but he ends up being happy anyway.

Edited by difficultdiva
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I'm back! We are back! Me and my husband are finally back at our favorite hobby! How could I postpone returning to this amazing show for so long??? What was I thinking??? Another World - February 2nd, 1989 The dead will revenge the living 

      Please register in order to view this content

      Bay City better be ready, because I'm back!   At Vicky's apartment she is once again drowning in doubts and jealousy. Deep down she realizes that her dream wedding will be a farce and nothing can change that. Bridget tries to calm her down, but the heroine is determined to suffer. She is not hearing any positive thoughts. She doesn't believe Jamie will marry her. At the Cory Publishing building another farce is in process. Iris, once again pretending to be the angel of love and sisterhood... is telling Mac and Rachel some wonderful news. When Iris has good news, you really need to look out for yourself. That's when things are bad. So what are the news? Miss Devil has put Amanda up for an award! Mac is smiling from ear to ear, and Rachel is suspicious. Maybe that's the effect Iris is looking for. To once again accent on the fact that Rachel doubts and criticizes her daughter. Iris will do anything to destabilize their relationship. She is like a cancer. Back to Vicky! Jamie is at the door. Looking like a sad puppy, he has come with a surprise. No, he is not gonna leave her and her unborn... Not yet. He has bought her earrings. Sad face. How nice. NOT. Victoria, of course... manages to break one of them the moment she touches it. Bad premonition maybe? She was back in hysterics. It's not easy to trap a man into marriage. Then you have to live with someone that didn't want you in the first place.  We were introduced to a new character (to me at least she is new) - Cass's sister - Stacey. She is giving me "hidden skeletons in the closet"-vibes. Love a girl like that. Stunning actress. I like her. The highlight of the episode was the strange and creepy reveal of Evan the escort... hugging someone named Janice's grave. I remember she had an issue with Rachel... and Rachel killed her in self defense I think... It was hinted in prior episodes, but I lack the context and story. I just know that everyone at the Frame house was mad that Rachel killed the bish. But I also got the impression that this Janice was sick in the head. So Evan is now talking to her grave and telling her he is going to ruin Rachel's life basically. Oh, Evan... I liked you better as a sexy gigolo.  Overall - 10/10 - how can I rate it lower when I haven't watched in months!!!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Once again, Marlena and Kayla were used very effectively and I couldn’t be happier.  Marlena counseling Johnny and then Chanel was the best part of today. They’re really delving into the human emotion of this storyline and I think that’s a good thing. It feels so much mature than it was before. EJ’s fear about what could happen to Johnny if he doesn’t let go of his anger could lead to some really good storylines in the future.  I also really appreciate the way that Paula/Jeanne are mixing it up and having different characters interact with each other. It was nice to see Shawn and Johnny remember that they’re cousins and share a scene together. I liked the parallel that was drawn between the two of them, and what’s going on with their fathers. I did have mixed feelings about everything with Cat though. I enjoyed Chanel warning her about EJ, mostly because it played into the way that she was written today. But I wasn’t the biggest fan of the Chad/EJ scenes. The two of them discussing Chad’s potential feelings for Cat didn’t really keep my interest.  But above all, I feel that everyone is being used more effectively and that we’re getting a better understanding of everyone as well. And that was exactly what Days needed.  
    • It's a wild story for sure, especially the final conclusion (and fireworks offcamera, like Victoria Wyndham tearing into Michael Logan).
    • @I Am A Swede @DRW50  

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • I did some research and the story wrapped up with Eric,a caretaker responsible for Georgina's death who then  tried to do away with Laurie but a vision of Georgina spooked him and he smashed into a mirror, dying of glass wounds. So there was a supernatural element. I wonder if the Brody character in the credits was Eric Brody?
    • AI has it wrong. David was working as an aide at PV Hospital due to failing to save his brother's life and refusing to continue as a doctor. His true profession was revealed later. Edna had divorced him while he was in Vietnam and he had no reason to be in contact with her. He had no idea that he had a daughter.  Ruth was Ruth Martin, she was still married to Joe, not Jeff. He was not deceiving Ruth as he believed that Edna was his ex. The poisoning story happened late in his run and probably introduced when they knew Gleason was leaving. AI's interpretation of him as conniving seems to based on that short lived poisoning story and other misinformation. For most of 76 he was involved in the Ruth/Joe triangle to the point where Ruth was ready to divorce Joe and leave town. Joe had to have surgery, David operated and Ruth suddenly realized she wanted to stay with Joe despite all the problems they'd been happening. David then got involved with Christina with Jeff and then Edna as complications. And he arrived late 75 not 76.
    • Interesting that they started going into a supernatural direction with ghosts - I don't think they really did that before? I wonder if it was a response to getting put so late in the afternoon and I guess trying to appeal to that former Dark Shadows audience? 
    • That makes sense then! Is there a place where you can read more Daytime Serial Newsletters? They sound very informative. Thank you

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy