Jump to content

Prospect Park Sues ABC Over ‘One Life To Live’ & ‘All My Children’ Licensing Agreement


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 725
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

You seriously think Frank or anyone at GH called PP up and told them this? Or thought about making it easy to bring them back from the dead for any other reason besides the fact it would make for an obvious story *for GH* to tell later down the road (as it seemed they were about to).

  • Members
Posted

The ratings rising every week that the OLTL dead weight is off GH kind of tells you about how GH viewers feel, IMO.

As for the lawsuit, I think it's a bad idea, but I'm so tired of this whole thing it makes me uneasy about PP as well as ABC, it makes the whole thing feel very seedy and becomes more about a cage match than about producing quality work.

I'm also preemptively rolling my eyes at Hinsey, Logan, Nellie Olsen, DC, etc. likely shilling for ABC at all costs, especially since the last two were furious at ABC when they put their fantasy boyfriends out of a job a few years back.

  • Members
Posted

No, i dont think they phoned them up for permission I think it was discussed when they brought them on, honestly. It was basically the kick off of Starr and her story, leading to Todd and Blair coming on. So yeah, i think PP knew GH was doing it.

  • Members
Posted

Because, honeslty the show didnt get saved. The title got saved, the town is being used, with a few characters. I can see why former fans wouldnt be interested in that.

And yes, I am a Brenda fan so therefor I am 100% team ABC and GH. I despised AMC and OLTL and am glad they are dead. I am busted.

  • Members
Posted

Thank you.

I am on ABC side in this though, but not because I am a GH fan - because im really not a huge GH fan.. I am atching again right now because Brenda is back and Elizabeth is beaing featured, and those are two of my favorite characters ever. I have totally hated GH for a long time, actually. I think GH bringing all three back on the same day is spiteful and done to stick it to PP, while I think PP is also very spiteful and dont respect them at all for trying to force actors onto their show that didnt wanna do it, and other things I cant post about.

  • Members
Posted

No one has forced anyone, and we have no idea who "wanted" to do what or not. For the eightieth time.

  • Members
Posted

so the fact that ABC threw AMC and OLTL away, and are trying to hinder PP every chance they get, when PP was more than willing to compromise with them..

I know... no one said they were forced to do anything, those who said are the fangirl bloggers but ME's whining on FB really turned me off to him

  • Members
Posted

Oh, your keeping count. Thats cute.

Yes, we do have an idea of who wanted to do what. KA has made it clear she had zero interest in iOLTL. ME's posts make a pretty strong argument he wasnt down either. RH seemed eager to do the web series in order to get back to GH, and thats it. Thats all pretty public and out there.

And for the, going by your counts, nineteenth time - I believe that PP wanted to get them all onto the webshow, and used their standings on GH to get them onto their show, or else off both shows. I see that as manipulating, strong arming, forcing, whatever you wanna call it. You dont, thats fine.

ABC cancelling them doesnt factor in, imo. And i dont think they are trying to hinder PP every chance they get, nor do I think PP saying that todd can only air on GH on days he isnt on oltl, they have to basically follow their story, etc and not letting GH keep ME/John and KA/Starr if they wouldnt appear on iOLTL and avide by the same rules is willing to compromise, but ok.

I agree, totally.

As for the soap bloggers/writers - Perhaps they knew more than they are telling, and thats why.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I’m thoroughly confused why she won’t say anything to Joss. Joss obviously has no intention of telling her.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • He knows from Nicole and Anita   Also good point
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Ted also stays at the hotel and Vernon is probably aware of that. As much as Ted wants to be back in Nicole's good graces he might feel obligated to tell if he saw Vernon coming out of a woman's room since keeping secrets got him in so much trouble before.
    • One more thing on Tuesday's episode, did anyone else notice the weird blocking? Belle and Eric were thanking Sarah, and worrying about Lyme Disease (which must be a red herring, I can't believe we're watching a PSA about inspecting for tics).  Then, Belle turned to EJ and threatened him with a lawsuit.  EJ acted as if he hadn't heard the entire conversation that was happening two inches away from him.   I like EJ, but a little of silly/mean EJ goes a long way.  His sarcasm during that scene felt out of place, regardless of Eric's presence.  When he bugs his eyes, and feigns innocence, it is a little too OTT for my taste.  I understand that he was the punching bag for most scenes, but EJ feels more mature than resorting to funny faces.  Isn't rather quick to worry about Stephanie's sales, she just debuted the book yesterday in their timeline?  And why is everyone against Jada and Theo?  Jada could use a boytoy, and this doesn't feel like a "forever" romance.
    • I dont think he knew Leslie was staying there. I know this is all for the drama and mess which Im here for, but Vernon really could have easily rented a small studio space where he and Sharon could practice lol.
    • I understand that no one could ever replace Bernau, but Ron Raines is somewhat of a different beast. Still great (to me) though. He spent his entire TV run in one role, that was impossible to do justice correctly. 
    • Again, Bernau's illness impacted that. It's pretty obvious Pilon was always meant to be temporary. I read an article from that period that said he was working on both Ryan's Hope and GL at the same time. So he wasn't on contract for either show. (Maybe that explains somewhat why his performance was so low energy, because he was overworked doing two soaps). Later, they put him in the opening and in commercials for the show. That must have been because they were certain Bernau was not returning. Around that time, they approached Zaslow about being the permanent replacement for Bernau. He turned them down and suggested coming back as Roger. Pilon stayed so they could re-introduce Roger and write an exit for Alan. I'm guessing if MZ had not wanted to come back, they would have had no choice but to keep Pilon (which I don't think they wanted, or maybe Pilon wasn't interested) or send out a casting call for a new Alan. I think they wanted to avoid that because they were really determined not to let the nature of Bernau's illness to become public knowledge. At this point, they were still keepin up the fiction that he was going to return even while this stuff was happening BTS.   Yeah, it seems crazy now, but people forget how stigmatized AIDS was back then. I'm convinced the idea to ask Zaslow to take the role came about so they could replace Bernau as quietly as possible. Everyone would have been so surprised it would have taken the focus off Bernau not returning. It makes a kind of twisted sense. Still, thank goodness Zazlow said no and they said yes to his suggestion to return as Roger. The way everything worked out gave GL a few more strong years. I guess it's the nature of soaps, you never know what things in real life will end up strongly impacting the show, both negatively and positively. (Something just occurred to me. If Zazlow HAD said yes to playing Alan...he would have had to play being in love with Reva.

      Please register in order to view this content

      )
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy