Jump to content

GH: Discussion for the Month of March


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

LOL! All I see is Sonny trying to be 'sexy' with Claire-which was gross since they have anti-chemistry, Maxie being annoying, Brenda having to deal with Spixie drama which is so uneccessary, and Jason being the voice of reason as always. Why on earth would Brenda have anything to do with Spixie and why is Maxie so irrationally mad at her? Anyhow, she did throw a dig in at Kate, but I seem to recall Kate telling Carly how much better she was than Brenda/S&B right before her ill-fated wedding to Sonny. Brenda can be bitchy, but I don't think she has any ill-will or any feelings at all about Kate. We shall see what transpires in her return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I tend to think every writer has a different take on Scotty. Is he a romantic hero, villian, or lovable anti-hero? There hasn't been cohesive writing for Scotty in twenty years (mostly Guza's fault). On PC, he was a very different Scotty than he was on GH in the early-mid 2000's. They should definitely keep him out of Laura's sphere because he is never gonna win that game. Everytime he is with her he becomes the villian and Luke gets propped up to the hero.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Re: Claire - if I didn't know showkiller Guza's MO like the back of my hand, I could've liked Claire - not as a love interest of Sonny's, but a nifty successor to Dara Jensen. The actress wasn't bad and I enjoyed that character's initial hatred of the sucktastic threesome almost as much as I did Judge Country's.

I'm not even going to discuss the fuckery that was our girl being stuck in roided goiter hell (as far as I'm concerned Minnie Mouse Maxie and Jar Jar Binks is a symptom of that sh!t) for damn near half her time in PC instead of interacting with her actual loved ones (Robin, Sonny, the Qs), so I'll just say that I can easily brush that one-off of The Real Kate Howard towards Brenda because neither woman knew one another well enough to make that claim. Whether they would've ended up friends or rivals, I do know that it would've been a lot better than what showkiller Guza subjected me to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know that I consider Tony to be in the same category, as I'd seen him as more of the steady and dependable type (much like Mac). They didn't lose at love as much as AJ and Scott did, but they were considered safe bets.

As for Scott, I did enjoy him and Lucy together (though my heart will always be with her and Sigmund's daddy), but they never set it up so that they'd have a lasting relationship (which I think had more to do with Lucy being fun-loving at the time than Scott being an undesirable option). I know that he isn't liked by many, but I don't think that he's awful enough to end up alone in the end in the same way that I wish of other males on canvas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Still here ^^ Come on Prime Video, it's due to bring it back!
    • Got through the eighth season, and it was... painful. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree 100% with both you and Mitch64.  Soaps have been going further and further off-course since 1981. TPTB just don't have a fundamental understanding of what makes soap fans so loyal. I'd love to be on a writing team with both of you.  Maybe we could put together a real soap opera, and show people what its all about...  
    • They weren't in town, but Fletcher worked at the paper (and we saw anniversary Journal headlines for the 50th, although I don't remember if Roger was one of them), and I'd think Alex would have at least heard of him due to the damage he did to Spaulding only a few years before her return to the fold. I know I have to remember it's not real life, of course.
    • YES. The videos being uploaded to Spauldingfield are almost to the point where Alan is reintroduced. They're already talking about the guy he pretends to be, and yes, he returns at a masked ball. In fact, that masked ball is almost beat for beat the same as the masked ball where Alex was introduced! Get a new schtick. Before the Kobe era, that's pretty much what they did. Characters would just show up. Maybe other characters would talk about them for a while--the Chamberlains, Tony, Maureen, Andy, Kelly, Carrie--but then they would just appear. When Hope came back, she simply knocked on Bert's door and said something like, "Hi, Grandma, I'm home again." No particular fanfare. Sometimes it would be a bit dramatic--Jennifer and Morgan were introduced when Mike accidentally crashed into their car, for instance, and Alan and Elizabeth were introduced through Jackie's flashbacks when she was remembering giving up Phillip for adoption. Nola was involved in the Roger return. Roger's return in 1980 was very dramatic, but in a way that made total sense. He was trying to kidnap a child, so dressing up as a clown did not seem crazy. The mask bit was not only silly, it didn't even make sense. Alex never knew him, so there was no reason for him to be masked in front of her. Yeah, she knew OF him, but there's that phenomenon called cognetive dissonance. If you see someone outside of an expected situation, you probably won't recognize them, especially if you never met them in person and think they're dead. I bet a CIA spook like Roger would be familiar with that concept. And he didn't have to be skulking around SF for months. Again, I will cut Long a little slack--it was not her idea to bring back Roger, she was told to do it. She never wrote for the character. It was something that was not planned. They originally went to Zaslow to offer him the role of Alan. He, of course, turned them down because that was a ridiculous idea, but then he suggested coming back as Roger. At such short notice, it's not strange his return was not handled well.
    • Eh...but neither had been in town. Know the name Roger Thorpe? Sure. But Alex would have gone crazy trying to memorize all of Alan's co-conspirators/lovers/wives and Fletch didn't even know Roger/Adam was on the island, IIRC. But who knew or should've known each other is always a little dicey when people come back to town. 
    • I wouldn't call Tomas' cuts a modern cut. They appear to be a slim/extreme slim cut⏤cut slimmer down the sides, with a higher armhole, which pulls up/out, depending on the fit of the person's body. Again, I feel like Ms Featherstone is buying to fit the wrong parts of the body; instead of buying to fit their widest parts (shoulders), she's buying things to fit their middle/waist (which is the easiest to ultimately fix without a complete re-cut), and it shows in the finished product. And the only reason it irks me is because I worked in suit sales for nearly ten years, and I notice these things immediately. The fashion(s) on this soap are miles ahead of three of the four others (I like the fashions from Y&R), but the tailoring is a choice, especially where the men are concerned.
    • There probably would have been a good chance they knew of him, especially with his ties to Spaulding and his being involved in so much scandal (meaning there would be plenty of photos and articles around they both would have seen), but I agree the mask was silly, clearly just a TV moment.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I think all the suits are fit too tight, except for Jon Lindstrom's. DC lawyers/doctors are not all LA fashion elites. Yes, maybe Tomas would have a more modern cut to his suit, but an established guy like Bill wouldn't go around looking like that lonely button on his jacket was ready to explode constantly.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy