Jump to content

GH: Discussion for the Month of January


Recommended Posts

  • Members

You wound me, Carl. (no pun intended, oops).

I do think she was acting more mature when JL was playing her, but I like KS, too. And her pink sweater, again, is fabulous. Because that's what's important here. :lol:

And I kind of wanted Starr and Trey to be together (although I also kind of liked him and Kristina, too), so I didn't mind her visiting with him in there.

I'm selfish like that. tongue.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I preferred Trey and Starr to Starr/Michael and Trey/Kristina. I understand why they have Starr paired with Michael, but there was at least chemistry or something there with Starr and Trey.

I have to admit I like Maxie/KS too. I was really enjoying the story until she slept with Spinelli, but I guess they couldn't have Maxie actually carry Lulu and Dante's baby and all go well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Maxie's a very disturbed person. She's done so much damage. I guess the show is saying she can't help it, she's just a girl - I don't know. It's increasingly difficult to see the body count wrack up without this ever being addressed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The shame is that FRon continuosly shovel that plain dog faced no talent at the audience. To give her Krissy's scenes with Trey was absurd! LM may suck, but Krissy was owed those scenes - NOT STARR who is not that much better!

It makes not sense that Starrr seems to be everywhere stealing scenes from other characters :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think there were probably plans that were scuttled when they decided to dump the entire story with Joe Jr, who was being set up as a "good" mobster and a victim of Connie's lies.

I could never get past EV looking old enough to be the father of that entire early twenties/late teens group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Haven't seen any clips from this week yet, but it's perfectly plausible for Starr to get scenes with Trey. Not only did they have more chemistry than she's ever had with Eeyore or that he's ever had with Krustina, they were a lot closer than he ever was with Krustina - though I'll give him 1/2 a gold star for at least attempting to make it work with that bint.

Perhaps, it's because I'm not watching the entire show, but I don't see her stealing scenes from other characters. IMO, she's exactly where she should be - mixing it up with Todd, Johnny, Konnie, Sonny, and unfortunately Eeyore and his Slagbeast mother. The only problem that I have with her as a character is that she insists on talking trash on my AJ even though she just met him a month or so ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They could've easily solved that problem by keeping Trey and Konnie apart for a while until they could set up another confrontation moment. I thought that he had potential to be more than just Konnie's unwanted son and it's a shame that they got rid of him since he was the most appealing male in that age range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Jean Hackney was awful and that lead to Ben's exit story which sucked. I liked Ben/Val together. Val's love for Ben was that of a grown woman moving on with her life and Ben's love for Val made him willingly decide to raise another man's children as his own.
    • It wasn't just a GL thing, it was an 80s thing. Opulent party scenes on soaps were very big back then. Even in regular episodes where people are just going to dinner they're dressed up like they're going to see royalty.
    • Just started the May 27 episode and first thing I see is that Willow got an ugly haircut since hte last time i watched   I dont have the context for how everthing went down but I know its all Lulu's fault which make her a bish for what she did to Gio
    • I'm pretty sure he was. But point taken. GL really had a thing for masked and costumed balls/parties in the '80's. Everyone looks fabulous, but those poor costume designers.
    • Still here ^^ Come on Prime Video, it's due to bring it back!
    • Got through the eighth season, and it was... painful. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree 100% with both you and Mitch64.  Soaps have been going further and further off-course since 1981. TPTB just don't have a fundamental understanding of what makes soap fans so loyal. I'd love to be on a writing team with both of you.  Maybe we could put together a real soap opera, and show people what its all about...  
    • They weren't in town, but Fletcher worked at the paper (and we saw anniversary Journal headlines for the 50th, although I don't remember if Roger was one of them), and I'd think Alex would have at least heard of him due to the damage he did to Spaulding only a few years before her return to the fold. I know I have to remember it's not real life, of course.
    • YES. The videos being uploaded to Spauldingfield are almost to the point where Alan is reintroduced. They're already talking about the guy he pretends to be, and yes, he returns at a masked ball. In fact, that masked ball is almost beat for beat the same as the masked ball where Alex was introduced! Get a new schtick. Before the Kobe era, that's pretty much what they did. Characters would just show up. Maybe other characters would talk about them for a while--the Chamberlains, Tony, Maureen, Andy, Kelly, Carrie--but then they would just appear. When Hope came back, she simply knocked on Bert's door and said something like, "Hi, Grandma, I'm home again." No particular fanfare. Sometimes it would be a bit dramatic--Jennifer and Morgan were introduced when Mike accidentally crashed into their car, for instance, and Alan and Elizabeth were introduced through Jackie's flashbacks when she was remembering giving up Phillip for adoption. Nola was involved in the Roger return. Roger's return in 1980 was very dramatic, but in a way that made total sense. He was trying to kidnap a child, so dressing up as a clown did not seem crazy. The mask bit was not only silly, it didn't even make sense. Alex never knew him, so there was no reason for him to be masked in front of her. Yeah, she knew OF him, but there's that phenomenon called cognetive dissonance. If you see someone outside of an expected situation, you probably won't recognize them, especially if you never met them in person and think they're dead. I bet a CIA spook like Roger would be familiar with that concept. And he didn't have to be skulking around SF for months. Again, I will cut Long a little slack--it was not her idea to bring back Roger, she was told to do it. She never wrote for the character. It was something that was not planned. They originally went to Zaslow to offer him the role of Alan. He, of course, turned them down because that was a ridiculous idea, but then he suggested coming back as Roger. At such short notice, it's not strange his return was not handled well.
    • Eh...but neither had been in town. Know the name Roger Thorpe? Sure. But Alex would have gone crazy trying to memorize all of Alan's co-conspirators/lovers/wives and Fletch didn't even know Roger/Adam was on the island, IIRC. But who knew or should've known each other is always a little dicey when people come back to town. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy