Jump to content

Should have ABC tried to make EON GH's Companion ?


allmc2008

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

EON aired after GH at 4 PM and P&G changed EON in the final years to more resemble a normal soap. There were no more mysteries and more paying attention to couples and normal soap stuff. GH at the time was very unrealistic with its spies and crazy plots, and classic EON was crime but very realistic. I don't know if they would have been a good fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

With EON being only 30 minutes and having had a pretty full canvas of characters and stories, I think crossovers would have taken away from the time needed to focus on its own characters. In its original run I only saw the last 3-4 years of the show. When AOL was streaming it online some years back I was able to see about another year's prior, so I don't have its long history to compare with it. I think the main thing they did those last few years was jump on the supercouple bandwagon (like them or not, Luke and Laura were a huge phenom and spawned a lot of attempts to grab the audience by focusing on couples that were charismatic and adventuresome) by focusing heavily on Raven and Sky (both Skys) and Jodi and Preacher. I think EON, like other soaps, tried to cash in on GH's adventure couple formula, but within their own realm...the whole mystery and murder angle as opposed to the undercover spy angle. They were still doing mysteries and just in those last few years, there were a fair number of killings of main characters (faux-Sky, faux-Gunther, Nicole, Nora, Eliot, Logan, Spencer). But things did get a little more outlandish, like both the original versions of Sky and Gunther turning out to be imposters (no indication of that prior to that storyline), both getting murdered and both the real Sky & Gunther coming on board to take over their places, Nicole getting killed by poison makeup.

BTW, I don't think EON was wrong to focus on the couples I mentioned as I believe their popularity probably helped keep the show on the air a little longer than it might have otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To answer the OP, no. The Edge of Night was great as it was and it didn't need to copy any show.

To answer the OP, The Edge of Night was great on it's own and did not need GH as it's companion.

As Max pointed out, The Edge not having the affilliates air it right after GH or at all was it's downfall. I know the show did well here in NYC at 4PM and other markets, but it all came down to cost.

I always wonder what would have happend if P&G had sold it to ABC or allowed it to air accoss the board in an earlier time slot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Holly's final big story was the Sebastian mess in late 2004.   Vanessa and Matt were promoted to regulars near the end and were heavily recurring prior to that starting around 2007/2008.
    • Keith has a softer presence, but it would have helped to see him be more aggressive or proactive in protecting them instead of standing around like a mannequin. A man the audience should be hoping and wishing gets back together with his wife. Nicole needs a new husband!
    • She needs to learn to be honest with her husband about her lusty interests because being sex positive only works if you're not cheating on your spouse.
    • https://x.com/JermaineRivers/status/1922782226317529409       https://x.com/JermaineRivers/status/1931204864136396907
    • Very disappointed in the writers in the way they are screwing with Nicole, Ted,  and Kat to make Leslie remain viable. So many holes everywhere.
    • Somebody brought this up elsewhere which emphasizes why this NuTed appears as such a weakling. Why is Kat doing what HE should be doing? And that's everything he can to rid him and his family of this crazy woman. Kat is doing all kinds of things she shouldn't do but now I understand her more. She can't count on her father to eliminate this woman because he's a wimp. He's been too busy inviting her into his home and serving her drinks and offering her invitations to birthday parties. WIMP!!!!
    • It's Men's Mental Health Month.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • This is (maybe) overly simplistic and nonsoapy, but Doug needs to go to Gamblers Anonymous, to deal with the addictive neurological excitement hits that gambling gives him - and which control his life. Vanessa needs to go to therapy to find ways to remain healthfully lusty and sex-positive, but to stay away from anyone who would demean her.
    • YT keeps commending GL clips to me. I discovered Kathleen Cullen was on in Christmas 1987. Was there any talk of making it permanent  or was this just a special visit? I wish they had made the visit permanent. I liked her chemistry with Grant Aleksander.  
    • I'm not sure it's as unpopular as you think.  I just think the show knew they were in a bind, and needed a proven couple for the viewers to invest in. Trying to reunite Vanessa and Ross had just failed in 87. I don't think Ed and Holly's affair was well received, as Simon and Garrett had a brother/sister chemistry. Enter Billy and Vanessa, who give you history and an out not to try and do a Josh/Reva/Billy triangle, which would've really wrecked the relationship between Josh and Billy. I'd have been ok with trying Vanessa/Ross again, and doing a Vanessa/Ross/Holly/Billy quad for a while. I hated Nadine. HATED. She had to be the most insufferable also-ran before ATWT's Julia Lindsay. This is where I wish I knew Roger's history better.

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy