Jump to content

GH: September 2012 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Herein lies a major reason why soaps have fallen in quality - because of TIIC's need to cater to this fast-food mentality instead of the old-school viewers who savored the supposedly unneeded prolonged stories. One need look no further than the asinine complaints that I'd read about GH episodes 'being too slow' when they aired the 90s reruns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I also don't think any prolonged story Ron Carlivati has ever written can compare to any old school quality stories. Can "David is Asa's son, let's talk about this for a year and remind people that he tried to kill Renee when he was a baby - oh wait, he's actually Bo's son, never mind, PAPAPA STEPNORA PAPAPAPA oh my sides" compare to anything good, ever?

1998 was OK, by Guza standards, although the last half did drag. 1995, 1997, and 1999 all dragged severely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Of course I don't agree my friend. Are the "stories" being drrrrraaaaaaggggggeeeeeedddddd out because there is more story or are we stalling? And if there is mileage left, it should not be retconned to death.

I certainly don't have a ff mentality, and I am absolutely certain others don't either. We just remember what good soap was. Cartini never knew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not me or anyone that I knew that was watching at the time. One of the reasons why I became a fan of GH (as well as soaps in general) was because of the time and care that they'd taken to develop characters and their stories so that their actions - whether satisfying or heinous - were must-see television. That changed with TIIC decided to cater to the viewers with an attention span of a gnat, which is a major reason why longtime viewers left the soaps in the dust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Honestly, it's both. And while the dragging-as-a-stalling-tactic was one of the main reasons why soaps were always spoofed, I gladly embraced it (well, with the exception of Passions, because that was just ridiculous) because I knew that I was in for a satisfying conclusion and would end up getting to know and love (or love to hate) characters in the process.

I'm well aware of what good GH soap was and whoever wrote for this one post-2001 was the opposite of that. There's a reason why I hold the Riche/Labine regime in such high esteem and it was because they knew how to write characters and good story while providing viewers plenty of reason to care about PC happenings. That quality died a permanent death once Riche was fired and has never recovered in spite of Cartini's GH being a lot more watchable than the shitastic decade-plus that was Guza's reign of terror.

Don't know about lame, but there are plenty of yet-to-be-resolved story lines in primetime - the likes of which keep folks like myself tuning back in every season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's also one of the reasons I became a soap fan. I just don't think soaps were doing any of what you describe by the late 90s. I always go back to the aftermath of Carly being revealed as Bobbie's daughter - a year and a half of story, resolved with Virginia Benson dying, Carly obsessing over Jason, Carly having little to no contact with anyone in the Spencer family aside from Bobbie, and Bobbie having very limited scenes where she tries to tolerate Carly as best she can. I was hugely disappointed and that told me to never trust Bob Guza.

Riche/Labine were better, but by the end, if you take away the Stone story (which was very good), you had the weird Bobbie/Alan stuff, boring Miguel/Brenda and Sonny/Lily, Laura gone half the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I haven’t watched since Daisy’s last episode. Part of me feels like its a good place to end it because outside of The Platt’s, Tracy, Todd, and Carla and Swain I haven’t really enjoyed the show. Too many depressing stories and irksome characters, I especially hate what they’re doing to Debbie. I do think its funny they spent all this time investing into that awful new family and apparently they’ve already been canned, feedback must have been horrid.
    • I think the pre-Barnabas episodes are very underrated both for dialogue and character. They're slow but they really create a world and fill out the characters, imbuing them with heavy dimension that ultimately will have to sustain them for years as the show largely stops writing for character after it returns from 1795. What we know about them by then is what they have to power them. (I don't think the show was bad after, I actually love it in '68 and often in times after that, but it was very different.) I think the B&W episodes with Barnabas' early days are especially frightening - they terrified me as a kid - but the color stuff in '67 is also very strong, especially in the stretch where Julia is on the run, Carolyn is under Barnabas' control, and you get the sense that events have gone off the rails for the regular characters and anything goes. As a child viewer seeing it in syndication on the Sci-Fi Channel, who had no idea who lived or who died, it was a lot. Mitch Ryan is especially powerful in the early pre-Barnabas era as the sort of Byronic Burke Devlin character. You knew they had to kill him once Barnabas comes in, despite Ryan's alcohol problem making it impossible to keep him at the show - Burke dominates the first year or so as the fulcrum character, he's incredibly magnetic and charismatic. You couldn't see him becoming a dupe for Barnabas and Julia, as Anthony George's more benign, mild version briefly does before getting unceremoniously killed off. I always found Burke's offscreen plane crash death very eerie and suspicious, and I think the show does toy with the question if Barnabas' powers somehow got him on that plane and if he took it down. I had always wanted Burke to return one day, in any revival project, as a kind of vengeful power broker and puppet master, driven by Vicki's inevitable demise to get revenge on Barnabas and co. I still have Art Wallace's "Shadows on the Wall" DS bible somewhere. IIRC in the earliest versions of the plot Vicki was going to somehow be tied to the butler or his daughter - Betty Hanscomb or something. I don't remember the exact details. I do know there's all sorts of raised and dropped plotlines and characters offscreen in '66, like Ned Calder, the man they clearly intended to pair with Liz and so on. I've always found '66 very rich, but I don't begrudge the show after for it because it's still awfully well-written, specifically the early Barnabas stuff.
    • I totally agree with this, as most of you seem to. Mary Carney was at least competent and reasonably likable; I just feel like she barely had anything of substance to do before she was abruptly given the hook. And I get the backstory of Kathleen Tolan having done a play with Helen Gallagher, but...at any point did they ever actually READ her before they greenlit her? Because...OOF. First time I saw her on SoapNet was right when this GODAWFUL actress named Charity Rahmer played Belle on Days of Our Lives for all of three weeks before she was mercifully recast; her line readings were straight out of a Charlie Brown special. I remember thinking Kathleen Tolan could have played her mother! In the Frank/Jill/Delia triangle, Delia WAS the one who was cheated on, so I got why she was upset and thought it was perfectly valid in theory at least, but of course it was blown up to Wagnerian proportions including falls involving staircases and tricycles. But with Pat/Faith/Delia I had no sympathy for her...especially because it was mainly with Catherine Hicks's Faith and I really liked her.
    • I was going through those episodes from 1984 and early 1985 before they were taken down. Some of the older characters, like Don and even Tom, looked a little out of place, like they were on the wrong show. But the newer characters were fun. It's too bad they lost the character of Melissa. I guess Jennifer took her long-term place on the canvas. 
    • How I will remember him...

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • The black and white episodes of the show are very special. An atmosphere the color run loses. Dark Shadows was filmed live-on-tape. They could do a retake but it would be very expensive. I think there was a claim that if actors wanted a retake they would curse. There was also a rumor that at one point Joan Bennett accidentally said "Hollywood" instead of "Collinwood" and that necessitated a retake.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Angela Lansbury stars as Jessica Fletcher in one of the longest-running and most beloved TV series of all-time, Murder, She Wrote. Set in Cabot Cove, Maine, Jessica is a mystery writer and amateur detective who is quick to outwit both criminals and the police when it comes to solving a murder. Winner of 4 Golden Globes and nominated for 12 consecutive Primetime Emmy Awards for Best Actress in a Drama, the series showcases unforgettable guest stars including Tom Bosely, George Clooney, Shirley Jones, Courteney Cox, Leslie Nielsen, Mickey Rooney, Tom Selleck, John Amos, Dorothy Lamour, Cyd Charrise and many more. In Murder, She Wrote: The Complete Series, help Jessica get to the bottom of every crime she encounters in this completely remastered collection featuring all 264 episodes, 4 TV movies, and bonus features. Special Features: "Novel Connection" (Crossover Episode of Magnum P.I.); The Great 80's TV Flashback; Origin of a Series; Recipe for a Hit; America's Top Sleuths; The Perils of Success
    • Loved this IG post from Ambyr about how she and Trisha work together. You can tell these ladies go above and beyond the script, and that they really trust and enjoy working together. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJpJufFPOQ2/?igsh=MXBmcWs0YzIwaXVhNA==  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • It is a shame that more characters didn't go the ATWT-Barbara route and make the ingénue into an antagonist. Sort of like they did with Liza/Hogan/Sunny, less successfully. It is a credit to ATWT's creativity that breathed life in that character for years after she was fighting off bulls in Spain.  But, a character like Liza can only have so many true loves and high jinks on the high seas.  They need another reason to be in the story. Liza's wealth, as well as her acumen to see through fraud, was fertile ground for tons of stories.  But, I feel like the business stories for Liza were always about her being easily overwhelmed, rather than exploring things like her leadership and managerial skills.
    • STFU!! Dante!!! This nonsense of blaming Gio is just ridiculous! Alexis and Lucky are becoming so unlikable. Why are the writers writing these characters so poorly?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy