Jump to content

Deception: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 141
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Remembering his reaction to the news of Vivian's death, I find it hard to believe Robert did it. It is probably more complicated. In any case, this is it.

I loved Julian proudly introducing Joanna to Will as his girlfriend and awkwardness that ensured. LOL! She and Julian were adorable making out at the end. They love each other. I am sure that they would work things out when the truth about her being a cop came out.

So in the end, Edward is his father's son. Where else would he go other than back home?

I cannot believe that Mia went back with that annoying guy. That Wyatt guy is a loon. Messing with Sophia is one thing, but who on earth would want to tangle with Robert with all that money and power?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If they are given another season then Robert would probably not turn out to be Vivian's killer unless by accident. They'd probably reveal that he was covering for someone. Had he answered the question about why he did it then I would believe they meant it. They just showed a bunch of scenes to make it seem that way but they can easily extend those scenes to give them all a different spin and/or sequence (specifically the one where Vivian asked to speak to him).

In the prior episode when Joanna's mother was lucid, it was implied that she killed Katherine. That scene with Julian implied otherwise and that's one of those instances where they can spin that scene differently by blaming it on her Alzheimer's or being more specific about how she was "dead" before she got in the car. It doesn't have to negate Robert being a monster because he did profit from her death.

Basically Robert as "the killer" allows them to keep the whole cast intact (minus Samantha) because Joanna will still need to stay there to gather evidence. They cleverly elevated Haverstock to AG as a reason to keep him around "running" the investigattion. Of course, none of it makes any jurisdictional or procedural sense. Vivian's murder is no federal case and it appears that Will forgot that he was trying to get the Bowers on federal issues (seucrites fraud or whatever). Instead Audrey Cruz ends up part of some corporate takeover scheme and the Russian mob is involved but it's still not clear who is behind them and why Edward is their target.

So Will can find Sam's killer that easily. They must have had something linking him to the shooting but stupidity/one-track writing prevails and he's idiotically placed in a line-up for Edward (who was not present at the crime scene). Then based on his unwillingness to identify the man, they let him go--even though something tangible had to have led them to him in the first place.

How does the all knowing Haverstock not know that "sparky" is a dirty cop. That was sort of funny in that he was quick to reveal that Joanna's sleeping with Julian to disqualify her when he's in Robert's pocket. They tried to make Robert seem all creepy with Joanna as if he knows and she's doomed.

Robert wouldn't be Wyatt's real problem....it would be Haverstock and Wyatt would be dead early into a second season, if they have one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But Wyatt does not know about Haverstock, he does know about Robert's wealth and power so why on earth would he as a ex-con kidnap, Mia? It is pure crazy. The end for Wyatt taking this ridiculous course of action is death or prison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're right. He doesn't know about Haverstock but of course Haverstock knows about him. He's a two-bit criminal obsessed with Sophia so it's not as if anything but Robert's money would factor in to his thinking. Robert doesn't seem to be that great when it comes to non-blue collar crime otherwise Haverstock would have been dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • IF this gets a renewal I can't see LY sticking around    
    • Well, I'm glad to know Devane and I are on the same wavelength, lol.  But seriously.  I don't believe there's any other word to describe the machinations that the producers constructed in the name of keeping Greg and Paige apart.  Greg and Paige made Sam and Diane look mature by comparison! Which would have been just as well, since a character like Greg Sumner didn't really belong in the '90's, as the storyline with the task force proved only too well.  If KL had returned for another season, it would've needed a MASSIVE overhaul, including ditching Greg, Paige, Claudia and Anne.  Mack and Karen would've needed to be there for the sake of continuity; and maybe some mileage could've been gained from exploring Gary's new life as a widowed single father.  (I still would've loved to bring back Julie Harris and have Lilimae help Gary take care of the twins).  Otherwise, it would've been a new era for KL, one without The Sumner Group, or stories like Wolfbridge and Empire Valley.
    • This is "Last Call" for anyone who wants to download a copy of any of these Award show files. Daytime Emmys, Full Episodes: 1982, .. 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, .. 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995 Daytime Emmys, Extras or Partials: 1990 1998 SOD Awards
    • What he said. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Didn't she know when she involved him in her scheme, before the character was introduced? I thought she tracked down Janice's son and poisoned his mind against Rachel in order to get him on board.  It's a bit confusing because in the summer of 1988 we get a lot of Drew Marsten (whom I had forgotten was Nicole's ex) and mentions of a mysterious Countess and also Reginald working to undermine Cory. Drew disappears around the same time Evan arrives, and gradually we get the reveals that he is in cahoots with Iris, Janice's son, etc. 
    • I apply totally different standards. For Felicia & anyone else in Bay City it's reel as opposed to out here in the universe where it's real.  
    • And that is why western civilization is screwed up with organized religion. but thats for another board. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Seeing T.R. give Danny a massage made me wonder if Jane Krakowski was considered for One Life to Live's Tina recast in 1990. At that point, Jane was in Broadway's Grand Hotel and probably not interested in coming back to daytime (plus, at 21, she would have been rather young for the role), but it still felt like a what could have been moment.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy