Jump to content

OLTL Alum, Brandon Routh (Ex-Seth) Cast In CBS Pilot


John

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I forgot he was the lead in that movie. He was absolutely atrocious. I don't understand how he got that role. Didn't he have audition? He got the gig on Chuck where he was just as bad and now this new role. I don't understand the decision-making in Hollywood sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But the money people and studio make the final decisions on the casting of those big budget movies. How is it possible that a director can get away with casting a talentless unknown lead for a multi-million dollar movie He must have slept his way through multiple people. It is the only explanation. Although it does remind me of how George Lucas cast that horrible Hayden Christensen as young Anakin when there were so many other talented young actors up for that role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That kinda gossip has encircled Bryan Singer since at least when he directed Apt Pupil. It bothers me to some extent--Singer has been an out director basically from the start and I think that plays a part, though it's also no secret that he does seem to like the pretty boys (then again how is that different from the way many women get hired)? I thought Brandon was fine in Superman actually--it was a poorly written movie, but he did better with zero material than I expected, but I chalk lots of that up to movies allowing tons more rehearsal and retakes and shorter scenes than tv (particularly daytime) does--often soap actors who sucked seem to do tolerable jobs in movies. I never saw him in Chuck though.

(And while Superman was a mess, I admit I may give more credit because I think Singer is at least a decent director unlike, say, his XMen replacement Brett Ratner who pretty assuredly does use the casting couch--although of course he also thinks rehearsals are for fags).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They also quite often can sign on solely on the look of an actor though.

Although somewhat ironically on several levels, apparently Brett Ratner bowed out of doing the upcoming Superman because the studios wouldn't allow him to cast his choice of Matt Bomer (ironic due to him being gay and working with Ratner, due to him being a stronger actor than Routh--maybe the studio learned their lesson-- and the fact he was also on Chuck). Though I think Henry Cavill is a better choice anyway...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Okay, I just checked out Bryan Singer on IMDB. I had no clue who he was before I saw his name here. He produced X Men: First Class which I consider to be the best X-Men movie with a fantastic cast. As a result, I am giving him a pass for Superman Returns. Everyone can have a dud now and then. However, anyone who gives Routh a job after that the debacles with Superman Returns and Chuck has problems.

I had no idea that Matt Bomer was up for the Superman lead. I don't find Henry Cavill particularly charismatic, I think he is the much better choice for Superman. I actually would have gone with the underappreciated Paul Walker as Superman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Singer's a talented director--and comes off in interviews as a fairly thoughtful director (though I suppose you shouldn't judge a director by his interviews)--he broke into the mainstream with The Usual Suspects which I don't think hass aged that well, but... (His new movie is Jack the Giant Killer which I think could go either way...)(

I could see Walker as Superman--wasn't he up for the role at some point (then again, who wasn;'t? I still can';t believe Nicholas Cage came close to getting it...) I do think Cavill can pull it off, he managed to make fairly anonymous stuff like Invincibles watchable, IMHO, but I don't really see why the execs were against casting Bomer. As little as I think of Zac Snyder as a director, after last year's misogynistic mess Sucker Punch particularly, but he is a better director choice than Ratner anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not sure why Superman is now supposed to look dirty and overmuscled. Then again that's what movies are now I guess...

Routh is just a blank slate. I guess he might have a good deadpan for a sitcom. Surely this can't be any worse than racist garbage like Two Broke Girls, or the living hell of Two and a Half Men.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They seriously were going to with Nicholas Cage? Incredible. The man is way too old and has had too much plastic surgery. I didn't know anything about the casting for Superman until I read it here. I can't believe that Walker was up for the role and he was passed over. Hollywood is such a weird place. Walker is goodlooking, talented, and charismatic. Instead, they go with Cavill who is just okay. They could have been against Bomer because he is gay, but I would not have cast him in the role either because although I think he is talented, he just does not strike me as a star who can carry such a huge movie.

Cavill does not look dirty and certainly is not overmuscled although he will certainly pump up for the role. Based on his preformances on the Tudors, he can easily play the tortured Superman/Clark Kent role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Okay, I looked at the pictures. Cavill looks crazy handsome and hot as hell. He certainly does not look dirty. I agree that the muscles are a bit much, but I am pretty sure that it is fake muscles built into the costumes. My only problem is that I don't like the colors of the costume. I think that the blue is too dark. I am really looking forward to the movie. Hopefully, it is good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • This can be difficult for a soap to depict. So far she's only shown an interest in women. Will a man come into her life? If she commits to a male, there will be  backlash, but if it's women only, them where is the bi/queer aspect? Personally, I would have liked a single gay male on the show dealing with hook ups/relationships etc. Smitty/Martin married with kids is limiting in those terms.
    • Of course, how could I have forgotten those thrilling episodes depicting the fire? Also we had the GCAC rooftop set that came out every Summer. Moving on to Friday's episode. Victor is propped in his chair, answers his cell and tells the caller 'Let him in'. Seconds later Kyle enters. So does Victor have security on the front porch? It would have been better had Victor taken the call, and then said to himself 'Well Kyle, let's see what you have to say'and fade out. Next scene Kyle enters, indicating that the first call was from the Ranch entrance and time had passed . Nit picky but I get frustrated when they do stuff like that.
    • Jordan was gone from '87 to mid-'89. He left just weeks after Robert's late '86 return.
    • Jordana Brewster is making a new movie. https://deadline.com/2025/06/rob-riggle-jordana-brewster-the-pirate-king-1236426287/ Kelly Rutherford posing for a magazine cover with her son. Kelly Rutherford Photographed with Model Son Hermés, 18, Years After Custody Battle  
    • I don't think Chelsea has a true label just yet. She's just finding out she has an interest in women. I think the awkwardness is aligned with the character as we've seen. This is the fool who keeps filming her family when embarrassing things happen and live streaming it. I actually think it's refreshing she isn't just jumping into a relationship  and that they're playing the beats of her trying to figure out who she is.
    • Wow, do I agree with you. Chelsea is coming off as ridiculous. All she does is look for a woman to date while not caring about her business at all. That she's bi is great, but they're not writing her like she's bi. She seems to be lesbian. Yeah, I know -- "no labels." I just don't find the writing for her story to be anything other than awkward.   -- I hope we get some diagnosis finality with Bill's trip to the hospital. I don't want to see these trips to the ER every other day. -- Naomi is going to blame herself for Bill's health problems? GMAB. -- Ashley doesn't read as a real nurse in the slightest. -- Another day, another rinse and repeat conversation with Derek and Ashley. YAWN. -- Kat is making mistakes, but she's fun to watch and listen to, regardless. -- I still think the Joey/Vanessa/Doug gambling story sucks. I know Doug is deeply in debt, but I don't like him acting this meek and submissive.  -- I'm not sure what Joey's plan was from the beginning, or why he had to seduce Vanessa at all to get his way. I'm not sure what Vanessa ever saw in Joey -- why doesn't he give her the ick? -- I'm fine with a story where Doug and Vanessa take out Joey.  -- The fades to commercials were pretty bad today.
    •   Victoria's house (that she long ago lived in with Billy) burned down (I think Aunt Jordan set it ablaze?). Victoria briefly moved into the ranch after the fire, with Claire, Johnny and Katie, I think? Mariah and Tessa and baby Aria had been living in the tack house but they bought a house we've never seen and moved there. Victoria, Claire, and Cole then moved into the tack house as soon as Teriah left. I guess Victoria's children Johnny and Katie would live with Victoria at the tack house eventually? But Johnny and Katie went to boarding school during the school year. Not sure if we'll see Johnny and Katie for the summer vacation or where they would live.
    • Victoria’s previous house burned down.    And I know why characters frequent Crimson Lights 3 times a day for brownies, muffins and empty mugs:   THERE’S PCP IN EVERYTHING. 
    • Today was a good episode, and the week for that matter. I think they've also done a better job with background music. The scenes in todays episode weren't as silent as they usually are in the background and it was noticeable. I think the show has found its groove well and I'm still invested. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy