Jump to content

Hannibal: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The DVD features an extensive, 1-hour-and-23-minutes long behind the scenes look at the making of episode 205, "Mukōzuke", from pre-production, production, post to the fan reaction. Really fascinating, in-depth look at the making of a TV episode (these kind of making-of videos tend to be at the very most 30 mins long). What impressed me is that they addressed the controversy of Katz's killing in some length, openly discussing the accusations from some fans that it was a racist, misogynistic move. Regardless of how I feel about it (and there were parts of the whole special that felt like damage control, etc.) I thought it was very interesting that it was (more than) mentioned and looked into.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm surprised they bothered. I wouldn't have. That character was nothing but one or two lines in a book until the show, they blew the role up into something much bigger than was originally planned on the show, and at that point in the narrative everyone who got too close to Lecter's secret was paying with their life. It was nothing to do with women or minorities, it was to do with their story and how they should be allowed to tell it. The show is not a cop procedural.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's like I said a while back - a major portion of their activist fanbase, the ones who are always pushing for their beloved "murder family" and "Hannigram" and selling the show on social media and are so obsessed with getting everyone but the janitor to wear those stupid flower crowns - many of these fans were drawn in by the idea of racial and gender equality, and isn't it awesome to have strong, complex women. And much of Fuller's response during and after the first season backed up their views.

The treatment of women in season two left a bad taste in their mouths, especially what happened with Beverly.

Maybe they should have just gotten over it and not expected exemptions from what was always billed as a grisly, high-stakes psychological drama, but they did expect more, and Fuller was happy to go along with that to get attention for the show. I don't think he and the other people running the show realized the backlash they'd face from the same social justice warriors who'd once championed them. So this, and the essay that the woman who played Beverly wrote not long after the murder, are attempts to get some of those people on their side again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How did it feel to you when you watched Season 2?

I don't think it's an "attempt" - I think it's just how all of them genuinely feel at the show, including the actress. And I think there is a very, very big difference between a) courting an active online fanbase and having fun with them, like most successful shows do and have to do these days with social media in order to generate an audience, and B) promising them something different than the show you actually made. Hannibal did A, but it never did B. If some fans thought they were getting B, that's their problem, it's no one else's and AFAIC the show has no responsibility for it. Nor do I think Hannibal ever betrayed any trust on what it was going to do. After two seasons I don't see it - they've been very clear all along on who these people are and where they're going.

There are plenty of shows that cynically trade on fan expectations, Hannibal never did. Most of the elements its fans enjoy are baked into the show, were there from the pilot and has always been there, but certain elements have not been, or were never intended to go beyond a certain place - case in point, treating the show like it's some team procedural people can pretend is an NCIS spinoff. Katz was supposed to die in Season 1 when she had a much smaller role, but they chose to beef it up before finishing her off. I don't think a show is inherently responsible for or beholden to the attitudes of its more reactionary audience members. I just came to watch the show, I didn't come to judge it against the stupider elements of its viewership. And I don't think what its audience does has to be relevant to what the show is. There are some shows that get bogged down in that, Hannibal never has, and that's what gets some people mad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Members

Positively stunned at that last minute curveball of Season 2: Hannibal and Bedelia Du Maurier are in it together!!!! YAS, honey, YAS. That's how you do a twist.

Hannibal literally left the whole cast bleeding and dying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • Members

Cancelled by NBC, which doesn't surprise me. It has always been a very low rated prestige hit. It's never fit on a broadcast network and this was inevitable.

I've heard for several years that a ton of other outlets would want a shot at the show, including Netflix, if NBC were to drop it. Also, its international deal via Gaumont makes it more cost-effective. I am expecting it to be picked up elsewhere. Some articles mention that Gaumont is already shopping it. DeLaurentiis confirms this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It was very surprising that a show like Hannibal managed to survive three years on NBC. I'm not putting down NBC, but with the level of quality everyone would presume it's a cable show.

I hope someone picks it up, be it Netflix, Showtime, Yahoo, AMC, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It should always have been on cable. The commercial breaks, the ads for The Voice and [!@#$%^&*], just had no place anywhere near it. NBC seemed baffled by it. I am amazed it lasted one season there, let alone three.

I know Amazon, Netflix, etc. were keen on it. I expect it to get a deal, but the question is whether or not Fuller wishes to continue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • BTG got another SNL reference at 00:50  CONTEXT (so it isn't misconstrued) in this joke swap segment, Michael Che frequently makes his white cohost Colin Jost read racist jokes written by Che.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • It's obvious that Israel's presence is a major divisive issue, and this is something that the EBU needs to deal with. According to the now published results Israel got 13 out of a possible 19 max points in the semi-final, and while their song isn't bad there's no way they would get those numbers without some kind of manipulation/political voting. They are clearly using this contest as a way of improving their somewhat tarnished reputation. I know that some people are comparing this to the massive sympathy votes that Ukraine gets and which propelled them to victory in 2022, but I feel that that was a more genuine show of support than this concerted effort from Israel to influence the televoting. I even had an ad on Youtube from Israel in Swedish(!) asking for votes! It might not be against any rules, but it feels a bit icky nonetheless.
    • Yeah, as you wrote, an Israeli win would have been a political disaster. Congratulations to Austria. 0 points from the televoting to Switzerland was a disgrace. Other than that, I really enjoyed the show ... but I'm also glad that Eurovision season is over 

      Please register in order to view this content

      Full results: Recap of the Grand Final:

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Hahaha Sorry if I was too negative, I just started typing and typing once I got going hahaha
    • @dc11786 Thanks for taking time to answer my various questions, along with giving your thoughts on the different writing teams. I wonder why they didn't just have Ryder and TR leave together if Jane was going anyway. The discussions over the last few pages have made me more interested in watching these episodes than I have been over the years - without the extra details and analyses provided, these years can be difficult to decipher (not helped by how often Jo seems like a side character).
    • I didn't think this was very good (I've never yet seen a good episode of this revival), but you do get a lot of Michael Stroka. And if you are a Donna Reed Show fan, you also get Paul Petersen.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • A very rare, fascinating look at camera blocking in a 1980 episode. Very loose, almost startlingly so (who expects to see Will Vernon with a cig dangling out of his mouth?). @vetsoapfan There's some Jacquie Courtney content in the back half of the video.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Barbara Stock shares memories of her time on Dallas, including that Ken Kercheval was the only cast member she knew outside of the show and that she did not actually realize she was being written out. https://www.remindmagazine.com/article/29593/barbara-stock-spenser-for-hire-dallas-chips-spinoff-doing-know/
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  I concur that this isn't the most interesting material, but I do wish I could see how JoBeth Williams played those trial moments.
    • If I remember correctly, they were interrupted before Nicole could reveal what the third thing was. I remember feeling like it was an intentional interruption, too. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy