Jump to content

'Scruples' & 'Valley Of The Dolls' Return As Prime Time Soaps


John

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The original Valley Of The Dolls was so perfect and of a time there is just no way any modern film can compete with it's glorious horribleness.

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/WfyhaXlKNts" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

They won't play it seriously and thereby create the camp factor, they will try to be campy and wind up not being entertaining at all.

this is the 1981 version and you can see the charm is just not there

<iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/tTkuSKiSaY4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My mom had the book Scruples and I remember flipping through it randomly and being shocked by how graphic some of those sex scenes were. Uhhhh, and the bitchy gay guy in the office, I can't even repeat here what he said/did.

Is anyone else thinking what I'm thinking re: Lee Daniels? Remember his admitted Susan Lucci fascination?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I saw some parts of Scruples back when WEtv used to show all of those great 80s mini-series (Hollywood Wives! Deceptions! Sins! Scruples! Lace! Bare Essence! why SOAPnet never aired these, I will never know). I saw the book for sale at my university's annual used book fair a few years ago, but I didn't buy it because it would have took up too much space in my brown paper bag :( Wish I'd gotten it.

Valley of the Dolls...sigh. I read it earlier this year, and I really wish someone would come in and do a mini-series version of the book because the movie just glosses over ENTIRELY TOO MUCH for any of the characters to be likeable or for the story to make sense. I hated Anne with a passion all throughout the book, but she's even worse in the movie, which sucks, because Barbara Parkins is my boo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The beauty of Valley of the Dolls, for me, was the retro aspect -- post-WW2 new England girl goes to NYC to make it big. Then there was the Judy Garland character. It is so gloriously old school it should be done almost completely seriously, like Mad Men with heightened Technicolor. Because otherwise it is going to look like just another episode of 90210.

Man, Judith Krantz was my crack back in the day. Nobody could write a sex scene quite like her. Shirley Conran's Lace was amazing, too. There is a boinkbuster book called Destiny and it's by Sally Beauman -- but came out just when that era of glitzy miniseries was coming to an end. I swear, if I had the money, I would make that book into a miniseries and try and shop it to the networks. It is awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Valley of the Dolls could absolutely be done in the style of Mad Men and be a straight up hit.

Scruples is a harder sell, but if it's done as an ensemble like Dynasty, Dallas or Falcon's Crest, it has potential.

Prime time soaps always have potential.

All I can say is PAGING JOAN COLLINS!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thank you. I know we're all supposed to see that BTG is progressive when it comes to queer characters, but it's telling that they won't commit to showcasing gay or bi males who are single and looking. That relationship couldn't be any more traditional. Will we ever get a bedroom scene with Smitty and Martin? I have my doubts.
    • This is a pretty huge thing IMO, but I guess we will see what happens? Can't get any worse then already. 
    • This can be difficult for a soap to depict. So far she's only shown an interest in women. Will a man come into her life? If she commits to a male, there will be  backlash, but if it's women only, them where is the bi/queer aspect? Personally, I would have liked a single gay male on the show dealing with hook ups/relationships etc. Smitty/Martin married with kids is limiting in those terms.
    • Of course, how could I have forgotten those thrilling episodes depicting the fire? Also we had the GCAC rooftop set that came out every Summer. Moving on to Friday's episode. Victor is propped in his chair, answers his cell and tells the caller 'Let him in'. Seconds later Kyle enters. So does Victor have security on the front porch? It would have been better had Victor taken the call, and then said to himself 'Well Kyle, let's see what you have to say'and fade out. Next scene Kyle enters, indicating that the first call was from the Ranch entrance and time had passed . Nit picky but I get frustrated when they do stuff like that.
    • Jordan was gone from '87 to mid-'89. He left just weeks after Robert's late '86 return.
    • Jordana Brewster is making a new movie. https://deadline.com/2025/06/rob-riggle-jordana-brewster-the-pirate-king-1236426287/ Kelly Rutherford posing for a magazine cover with her son. Kelly Rutherford Photographed with Model Son Hermés, 18, Years After Custody Battle  
    • I don't think Chelsea has a true label just yet. She's just finding out she has an interest in women. I think the awkwardness is aligned with the character as we've seen. This is the fool who keeps filming her family when embarrassing things happen and live streaming it. I actually think it's refreshing she isn't just jumping into a relationship  and that they're playing the beats of her trying to figure out who she is.
    • Wow, do I agree with you. Chelsea is coming off as ridiculous. All she does is look for a woman to date while not caring about her business at all. That she's bi is great, but they're not writing her like she's bi. She seems to be lesbian. Yeah, I know -- "no labels." I just don't find the writing for her story to be anything other than awkward.   -- I hope we get some diagnosis finality with Bill's trip to the hospital. I don't want to see these trips to the ER every other day. -- Naomi is going to blame herself for Bill's health problems? GMAB. -- Ashley doesn't read as a real nurse in the slightest. -- Another day, another rinse and repeat conversation with Derek and Ashley. YAWN. -- Kat is making mistakes, but she's fun to watch and listen to, regardless. -- I still think the Joey/Vanessa/Doug gambling story sucks. I know Doug is deeply in debt, but I don't like him acting this meek and submissive.  -- I'm not sure what Joey's plan was from the beginning, or why he had to seduce Vanessa at all to get his way. I'm not sure what Vanessa ever saw in Joey -- why doesn't he give her the ick? -- I'm fine with a story where Doug and Vanessa take out Joey.  -- The fades to commercials were pretty bad today.
    •   Victoria's house (that she long ago lived in with Billy) burned down (I think Aunt Jordan set it ablaze?). Victoria briefly moved into the ranch after the fire, with Claire, Johnny and Katie, I think? Mariah and Tessa and baby Aria had been living in the tack house but they bought a house we've never seen and moved there. Victoria, Claire, and Cole then moved into the tack house as soon as Teriah left. I guess Victoria's children Johnny and Katie would live with Victoria at the tack house eventually? But Johnny and Katie went to boarding school during the school year. Not sure if we'll see Johnny and Katie for the summer vacation or where they would live.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy