Jump to content

AMC: Emmy Pre-Nominations


Jonathan

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

So safe to say AMC wasted one of their prenoms.

Bets

Lead: Susan/Debbie or Alicia/Rebecca. Michael E. Knight/Vincent Irizarry or Darnell Williams

Supporting: Chrishell/Alicia (?) or Rebecca. Ricky Paul Goldin/Jacob Young or Jordi Vilasuso

Younger: Who ever was eligible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really hope Debbi Morgan and Susan Lucci are nominated. Debbi of course has so much to choose from and Susan Lucci did some stellar work this year to. I hope she submits that January episode that centered around Erica (where she broke down in front of Kendall), or that fantastic episode from July when Jane rebeled against everyone.

Please register in order to view this content

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vN27kryu3dU&feature=related

I think that Jane/Erica episode would be a good choice for Best Drama series as well. Or the finale (we'll see)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Who should get prenoms

LA- Vincent, MEK or DW

LA- Debbie, Susan

SA- Jacob

I don't think anyone else deserved them quite frankly. Alicia or Rebecca getting a prenom for Supporting Actress wouldn't surprise me. Same with either RPG or Jordi for Supporting Actor. I have no clue why or how Chrishell got a supporting actress prenom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

All of Chrishell's scenes are either made or broken entirely by the actor or actress she is opposite against. She does no work on her own and never seems capable of even half way attempting to put in her share of the work to match her opposite performer. All of the actors she works with have to work around her inability to get into deeper emotions as well as her general lack of presence/skill. All of this makes scenes with her harder and working with her a chore as they have to work against her and not with her. Which is to say unfortunately that Chrishell herself is such a non-entity when it comes to performing. She is a vacuous void and her portrayal as Amanda existed solely for the writers to have a plausible excuse to bring Kate Collins' Janet back to AMC every odd month or year.

The supporting actress category is seen to be the most diverse category when it comes to acting styles and it is even sometimes argued by critics to be the hardest category to crack a nomination in. I don't know what AMC's staff, crew and actors were smoking when they voted but putting Chrishell in such a pivotal spot as one of AMC's last pre-nominations was just foolish. At least with Allen there was an excuse that no one else was available for the category. Chrishell's pre-nom is unforgivable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hope to see Debbi and Susan both nominated in lead

Vincent and MEK for lead as well

I don't see the love for Chrishell this year. I don't think she did anything that great, the Janet stuff was just ok. I thought she did much more powerful work in 2009 and 2010. For Supporting Actress I hope to see Melissa Claire Egan and Lindsay Hartley nominated.

Supporting Actor definitely Jacob Young

I hope to see Finn Wittrock get nominated for Younger Actor, he did great work once again! Anything he did with Jamie Luner and MEK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It doesn't matter which one she chooses. I don't think either of them are strong enough. I would choose the July one though there is enough variation of emotions to at least attempt at versatility. The scene in general also doesn't demand too much of her. That February tape just highlights all of her limitations as an actress since the tape plays heavily on the need for a dramatic performance and Chrishell needed to go so much higher then what she delivered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • So I think I figured based on the end credits who is the script writer for each episode. Thursday's episode looked to have been script written by David Kreizman, and it was a well written episode that flowed well. Today's episode looked to have been script written by Henry Newman (son of Fran Myers and the late Roger Newman).   Right now, I've noticed improvements on the day to day scripts and that's a good sign that eventually the long term outlines that we will see in the coming weeks and months will be good.  Fingers crossed.
    • I have a very different view of Dano. For one thing, she like me, loves her little dogs. Another thing, of course she is effusive, outgoing but she is also very vulnerable & she used to have her Frank, her mother & Vivian who officially was her publicist (I think) but she was so much more. Now, they are all gone. Well, except for her always having a pair of her little dogs. But, if I were going to think in your terms, what I would think is "cool aunt". Because this lady is really one cool dame. Here is one of my favorite views of her https://www.instagram.com/reel/DGecq8rJS4w/
    • NBC Press Photo, text, from Jason47's files on daytimeroyalty

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I found it to be a rather odd way to deal with a character departing for parts unknown.
    • Today reminded me as to why I’m a little disappointed in the name that the new Pope chose

      Please register in order to view this content

      Luckily, EJ and Johnny, and pretty much every other character saved today’s episode.  I didn’t expect Javi to be the one to save Sarah though, and I don’t mind it at all, because if it means that Javi is finally going to get his own identity/character, away from his douchy bf, I’m all for it. Javi’s scenes would’ve been a lot better had it not been for him. EJ and Johnny were the best part of today. Their conversation hit a lot of important beats and I’m so looking forward to seeing them play out. And now that EJ knows that Johnny is going to work for Xander, that opens up another dynamic to their storyline and to the Kiriakis family storylines as well. Tying them all together could be really good. There are so many story possibilities that can come out of this. And I thought Carson Boatman did a pretty good job again too.  I also liked that Johnny was there to comfort Chanel after everything that happened with Sarah. They’re so good together. But I do have mixed feelings about Chanel possibly forgiving Johnny so quickly. Hopefully, the question that she asked him at the end of today leads to more conflict for the two of them.  And yeah, still no changes in Alex’s character lol 
    • Awesome, thanks so much for taking the time to grab this episode. I had a quick review of your rip because I was curious why it was 700MB and 30 minutes. The first 10 minutes of the episode is 3169 (opening credits at 5 minutes and again at 15 minutes). I thought we had the full HD version of ep.3170 on the YouTube channel, but it appears they added the wrong episode but labelled it 3170. 
    • I guess, according to Mike Manning in the Michael Fairman chat, he was almost Derek 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • OIC Thanks. I saw thzt & looked for a prior  ... never mind. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy