Jump to content

Joan Collins on Fat People, Asians, Reagan love, and Warren Beatty, etc


EricMontreal22

Recommended Posts

  • Members

One last comment, and I'll shut up, for now tongue.png I've never battled weight issues--It's helped I think that I'm vegetarian and despite giving up on ever being a pro dancer, have kept it up, but I have a twin sister who battled bulimia for years (and still somewhat is), and a mother who has battled her weight due to thyroid issues (which are under control now but she still is overweight, though not obese and thanks to her vegetarian and halth concsious diet actually has no cholesterol or health issues unlike her MUCH leaner boyfriend, who somehow seems baffled by the fact he has so may more typical weight issues than she does and doesn't seem to get why...). I think it is too simplific--and I appreciate your background DaytimeFan and know you know what you speak of, but--to say there are very few reasons to be overweight, but regardless, it's much more about the way Joan said it. And of course... that;s a huge part of her appeal--how blunt she is, and I'm sure she knows that.

LOL biggrin.png It's one thing to find her entertaining, the way you would find your fun grandma who you realize is racist and you can't take anything she says seriously, but it does seem (from the forum I found this interview on alone) that many people feel she's preaching the truth. Again, that's actually not Joan's fault, or responsibility, but I think it's worthy of argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I agree. I respect your background, as well, DaytimeFan, but I don't feel you can just dismiss weight-gain like that. Food can be a serious addiction. As someone who struggled very much with food addiction in relation to depression and lack of self-esteem when I was much younger, I can wholeheartedly assure you that gaining weight/ being overweight is NOT a choice. You can hit that gym everyday. You can try to eat smaller meals. But when food is a coping mechanism, an escaping mechanism, that weight is there to stay. So maybe she's been pregnant, but it's not the same thing. And I'm assuming you've never been overweight yourself (though pardon me if I'm wrong), because I don't honestly believe someone who has been could say something so callous or agree with the comments this woman made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's it--I admit I come from a shrink heavy background, having seen one for some childhood issues off and on since I was really young--but I know the people in my family who have struggled with weight issues (either way) have also struggled with extreme sexual abuse. It's a complex issue because many factors are involved, but that's true of alcoholism too (didn't Joan have issues with drunk?), and drug dependency, etc--by no means is it all about self control or one or two health issues. I don't think the weight epidemic in the USA (and, ok here in Canada too) is all because everyone has suffered some form of abuse, by any means. Not even close. But it is a much more complex issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I typed out a long reply, but I'm not sure whether this is the right time to post it. We'll see what DaytimeFan (and others) have to say in reply to my post and Eric's, and then maybe I'll share.

All I'll say is that I was not physically or sexually abused EVER in my life, but I know that is a huge cause for food addiction. My issues with weight stemmed from depression as well, and I'll leave it at that. For now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well a background of abuse does play into depression, often--so it's not so far removed in that way, I do think it's psychological as much as physical. (and I mean look at a famous example like Oprah who has the best chefs and personal trainers behind her and has never really been able to shake the weight)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh I agree. I was simply saying for me, MY depression didn't stem from any form of abuse. It stemmed from my own problems with self-esteem and self-worth issues. However, you're right. Many times abuse plays into it. I was just saying that wasn't the case for me, personally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Reagan was just all around very backward a lot of issues, without getting too political, I'll just say he set the ball rolling on a lot of the political theatrics that go on today. I do have to admit, I'm not that well read in Thatcher's positions outside of economics, as I've always read about her economic style, but I'm not surprised to read that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Absolutely. And It aggravates me more than ANYTHING else when people who have never been in that situation want to judge and make rude, ignorant comments.

I guess that's what you have to do to stay relevant, when your career dried up 25 years ago and no one is begging you to take any roles...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I've seen it posted elsewhere people saying "Veronica" should be on this show. My response is always going to be hell no.  You're definitely right about these characters catching on with the audience. Everyone has their favorite. I was pleasantly surprised people have some for Doug. 
    • If the show was interested in tying in one of the three prime time specials in the 90s, the smarter choice probably would have been Night Sins from 1993. Night Sins was the ushering in of Titan Publishing, the first mentions of Kate Roberts coming in to run it, plus it had involved Jack retyping a manuscript he had found in the new house he and Jen moved into... which ended up being a thinly veiled story written by Kate about her dalliance with Bill Horton that produced Lucas. However, I doubt the writers were even thinking about the prime time episodes when deciding to name the manuscript One Stormy Night.  I also don't see Stephanie being the one that would be writing it.  The current actress playing Stephanie seems to play a more passive version of Stephanie vs the previous takes by Shayna and Shelley..imho. Javi is cute... much too good for Leo.  He can do so much better.
    • I might've gone after someone like Jed Allan, or even Donald May. Though they're very different.
    • Same.   Looking forward to seeing what I missed later. And God bless him for coming back!!! I was so happy to see him again! But...will he be for Dani...or Nicole? Hmm
    • Question for all: Who would have made a good Mike recast after Stewart departed?
    • I think they did. Again, it is not an either/or proposition for most of the audience so far. Most don't feel the need to stan one or reject the other.
    • KKL on Bold Live on May 1st. Details here  
    • I do wonder if the show realized that fans would take to Silk Press and Eva as much as we have?    To me, I think the core four was mostly used to get eyes on the show since all four were familiar performers in both daytime and primetime.   Of the four, I think Nicole is used most effectively where it doesn't look as though she's hogging airtime.  She works as a lead and as a talk to. Anita has been the most under utilized of the four, but I do have a feeling that might be changing once the Ted/Nicole/Eva/Silk Press Story goes back to support status. Of the four, I think Dani has been over-used.. but I do still see potential for the character.  I know some people think she's the modern day Erica Kane, but I don't see that.  Erica was a Have Not that became a Have while Dani is a Have by birth and has done nothing to have earned being a Have. Good cliffhanger.
    • LOL now this sells it for me!  I can't wait to watch later tonight!
    • I think this is a great observation.  I do wonder if some of that was down to how Nixon had started writing story and plot outlines.  By this point (maybe even by the mid 70s) many have discussed how she *didn't* write detailed story outlines anymore--the focus more was on a mood or theme and ABC simply allowed that because they trusted her at this stage (in her "memoir" I think even Megan McTavish talks about Nixon's writing in this way in the 90s and she basically seems to admit that it worked for Nixon.  But if Nixon wasn't in charge of the daily execution of these ideas...) What was with the ABC soaps around that time bringing in Aussie "hunks" from Heartbreak High?  Richard (Corey Paige?) Tanner on AMC (Vince Poletto) OK not from Heartbreak High but didn't Ingo Rademacher start on GH around this same time?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy