Jump to content

FX: American Horror Story


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 340
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Administrator

http://www.deadline.com/2011/07/fx-picks-up-ryan-murphybrad-falchuks-pilot-american-horror-story-to-series/

The spooky project which stars Dylan McDermott, Connie Britton and Jessica Lange, has been picked up for 13 episodes and is eyed for a Halloween launch with an October 5 premiere. Described as a psychosexual thriller, American Horror Story centers on a therapist (McDermott) and his wife (Britton) who, dealing with the aftermath of the husband's adultery, move along with their kids into a new house that seems to know all about their fears and plays on them. American Horror Story has strong supernatural elements (For example, the housekeeper is perceived differently by the two spouses) and also explores other forms of horror in society.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Members

EW picked it as one of their top shows--after a kinda mixed review a few weeks earlier which confused me. A GREAT cast (though I can take or leave Dylan McDermott who probably will do a lot of yelling), and yeah the off beat, S&M sex meets horror thing has me intrigued. It's Ryan Murphy so probably will work really well for the first few episodes-or maybe even first season. Apparently each season will have a new family... Anyway despite my feelings for Murphy, I'm definitely giving it a chance.

I still find it pretty bizarre how they advertise it from the creators of Glee. Yes, Glee has a big following, bla bla, but it just seems liek the kind of thing you don't wanna remind audiences wanting a cutting edge horror show, about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He really is.

Actually Ken Tucker at any rate has been very ahrsh on Murphy as of late--it was a marked turn around, he's been one of the few critics I've seen say exactly what all of us say--hwo the man has never had a successful post first 13-episode season. But yeah, whoever then put the show after their mixed review in the "5 to watcdh" obviously wasn't paying attention to the review, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Skin, you had issues with how Torchwood shows women--but didn't in Nip/Tuck? Not trying to pick a fight at all, I'm genuinely curious (I suppose it could be said that the men on Nip/Tuck became so ridiculously reprehensible anyway that every character was treated with disdain...)

I loved its first year, and admit while i was already annoyed with the dropped storylines, I enjoyed how gothic it started to get in Season 2. It was the revelation of the Carver at the end of Season 3 where I really started to lose interest. I think I stopped watching sometime in Season 4 (I had to download it at the time which played a part--if it was still on tv locally I may have tuned in just out of habit). I know the cast was VERY vocal about how much they disliked and were confused by season 4. Season 5 was meant to be a reboot with the move but that was kinda fruitless and apparently they filmed Seasons 5 and 6 back to back, with FX airing 6 much later than filming--I did see some of the last season and the finale but I just found the over the topness so ridiculous and, while the show always had a nasty edge, it got downright unpleasantly mean spirited I felt, just for the sake of being mean spirited. (and stories like the son getting breats implants to please his cellmate, etc, I just can't...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They lost the plot completely in season four. I don't think there was one damn thing that came out of that season that was even remotely viable to the characters story arcs. After season four the show degraded into pointless shock value and gratuity. It existed solely for the sake of shocking the audience and they didn't care at all about character dynamics. The storylines were just ridiculous.

As to the way women were portrayed in Nip/Tuck I can't say I objected to the way they characterized the women. All of them had their own goals, all of them were independent (or became so) and all of them were diverse enough characters who were different from another to have meaning and remain important figures to the show. Of course there were tragic tragedies (name every single one of Christian Troy's love interests who he single handedly decimated one by one) but they were all three dimensional characters who held meaning. Which is more then I can say about Torchwood where it seems the women are only used as fleshy appendages for the male characters. I can say that the female characters on Nip/Tuck weren't portrayed as being perfect and they weren't portrayed as being hellish harpies either there was a richness and variation to each character and they were well defined entities separate from the male protagonists. I would actually say that Murphy did a good job creating different characters who were all strong and had their cons just as they had their pros. Although Murphy being Murphy at the end of the show no characters were likable and he diminished every character he penned.

Much like what he is doing with Glee. Nearly no character on that show is likable and that is because Ryan Murphy has no clue how to write a likable protagonist. I would say Sean McNamra and Sam McPherson were probably the closest he ever got. But even they disintegrated into hypocrisy and wrongly attributed self-righteousness on numerous occasions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Watched the premiere tonight. The show has promise and potential but was rather sloppy and all over the place. The daughter's story only had like three scenes total with vague explanation. The real horror is that the excessive amount of quirkiness will probably sink the show. Of course bad acting from Dylan McDermott and Jessica Lange hamming it up didn't help matters either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ha Lange was a highlight for me (though again Ryan Murphy with the down syndrome characters/actors--I can't tell if it's nice to be inclusive--we certainly do need more people on tv with disabilities--or is just exploitive. on Glee it comes off as condescending more often than not, and so far on AHS it came off as just kinda hard to watch, but the whole tone of the show seems to be aiming for that). It does look great, and aside from McDurmott I thought hte cast was great and did a lot more than they could have with such thinly drawn characters. I admit, I kinda liked how over the top and unrelentingit was--which seems odd as I complain about those same qualities in Nip/Tuck and Glee, but I'm not sure if it can sustain that tone even for the 13 episode season and not just get boring.

I'll watch a feww more episodes...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Yes from when they went on Let’s Make a Deal too. Pam stole Forrester designs for Jackie M. Of course a month later we saw Nick, Lesley, Owen, and Bridget all exit in the same episode.
    • Great pairing that seemed to come out of the blue! Around that time, it felt like Sheffer/Goutman didn’t really know what to do with Emily or Hal. And KM and BH had surprisingly great chemistry. It was good for Emily especially because she was coming off those unsympathetic years with the Tom affair and then running the Intruder and essentially just being a busybody.
    • I think the issue with Lulu is less the character (which was the issue in the Julie Berman days under Guza II) and more the lack of nuance. The current GH team rarely writes nuance for any character or at least can't sustain it for long, or they reserve it for a favored few. I also think the rooting interest at GH BTS often remains on preferred characters or actors - BLQ/Setton - vs. Laura's kids. So it's easy to make Lulu the heavy if you think Brook Lynn and Chase are the money on this show. I don't, but I think FV does. And that's not to say I think Amanda Setton is bad in the role, or that I would get rid of BLQ. I don't trend towards either (though I do think that if Setton's personal beliefs keep getting in the way of material I would reluctantly recast). I think Brook Lynn is essential to use as a lead presently. But I don't think it needs to be the black and white dichotomy of suffering young matriarch BLQ and aggressor Lulu. While it's good that unlike in the Guza years they can recognize that Lulu can be obnoxious and rash, can be her own worst enemy and that that is part of the character, it can be toned down or given more layers than it has of late. There's nothing wrong there the writing can't fix.
    • 1999: I just watched it. It felt so primetime. La Lucci is making history. Aretha's daydreaming segment. @Contessa Donatella Thank you, my love. So helpful and informative as always. adding them to my queue.
    • I know this isn’t a usual or anywhere near universal take, but I loved the relatively brief Hal/Emily relationship/marriage more than I ever thought I would have with KMH/BH.
    • In my field (not that) I've written my share of dreck when it's what people wanted vs. something good. In the end what matters is the check. These pilots may not be great, but whether or not those writers intended otherwise they got paid.
    • I think there is plenty to critique and/or roast about the show, but I think there's also good bones and a lot of progressive improvement. It's the Bell/B&B formula and house style that is hardest for it to shake and the most necessary IMO, as well as some dead weight actors or characters, but that formula also apparently works for a lot of general viewers and I suspect CBS. OTOH it's also very modern in certain ways (sometimes overly hip dialogue, and some story) that still make it feel like a show that's bouncing between distant past staples of soap opera fundamentals and the present moment. And the old fashioned product placement is fun but also so goofy, while material like June is hysterical. Imagine leading with 'the underpass is where I live, and I like it there!' It's an unusual show in that way, because its identity and tone is still not fully formed. You don't know what it'll be. But that's normal at this juncture. The closest thing to a glimpse of the future foundation, I think (besides the obvious core family setup that's been there since Day 1), is the rivalry and future familial bond - and likely love/hate relationship - between Kat and Eva. A la many central sisters or siblings throughout soap history.
    • I loved Kelley Menighan! She was an MVP, especially during the show’s last few years. I always looked forward to anything she did with MM, BH, CZ, MW,  and the two grownup Alisons. Wasn’t a big fan of her with RH’s Paul. I always admired how she balanced being a vixen and being neurotic.
    • LLC can be a lot (lady definitely doesn’t phone it in), but her scenes with Rena made me wish they played actual sisters on a better platform.  Aside from JE, who is a legend so it’s no surprise when she’s excellent, Amanda Setton is my MVP of this story and she hasn’t always been great in this role. You see so much happening in her face as she’s navigating the shifts and layers of this story. She’s fully locked in. Glad Rory Gibson is getting his due on GH. I knew he had more to give than what Y&R was giving him. The writing will be a factor here as well because the character of Michael hasn’t been written well in ages (if ever, arguably). GH just can’t sustain the good stuff for more than a few weeks. Alexa Havins is a very good actress and was widely embraced as Lulu initially, but the character’s one-note abrasiveness has a lot of folks wishing she was gone at this point. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy