Jump to content

B&B: Old/Classic Discussion & Articles


Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

Loved the Faith reveal...was such a huge Joanna Johnson fan back then. Funnily enough, watching Caroline again now 31 years later (up to episode 633), I find her to be quite nasty at times, really rude to Stephanie. I guess over the years I have become a Brooke fan, so seeing her being quite nasty to Brooke has has me change my view on Caroline. Plus I guess I'm a lot older and can see that she treated Thorne pretty shoddily throughout most of their marriage.

 

Still, I'm not prepared for her to die in around 100 episodes or so...I cried buckets back then and still get a little teary thinking about it... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I just finished uploading 2018 episodes that aren't on Youtube (September, October and November 2018)... I was going to start with December and by the end of this week I intended to add August, September and October 2020... but it tells me "Error, quota exceeded"

 

Does this mean the Vault is 100% full?? Or  did I exceed my number of uploads in 1 day? Does  ChickenNuggetz92   have informations? I hope this problem can be fixed. I'll try again tomorrow.

 

Soapsuds    I didn't even know there was a tennis thread. Thank you for the info, maybe I'll visit it one of these days.

Edited by Jennybold1974
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You can read it from the page source code. The episodes are always labelled CBS_BOLD_episode.number and that episode was marked as CBS_BOLD_8511.

 

Interestingly, those Pt.1, Pt.2 episodes were marked as 8426 and 8426A.

Edited by LuckyBold
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, exactly. I wonder now if celebrating #9000 episode will mean #9001 or #9002 in other countries. But since we had the number on the original script with LSV as a writer, and it was confirmed by Casey Kasprzyk, there's no doubt about episode numbers form now on. Still, though I can understand why 8318A could be skipped in the international broadcast, but why Christmas episode was marked as 8426A, it would continue to baffle me

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So the Vault is full, that's what I suspected. I suggest we don't delete anything for now. Especially not the  photo archive, which only takes a few Mo. Even if we delete some episodes the problem will resurface as soon as we post new stuff.

Let's wait until ChickenNuggetz92 sees these messages and see what she says..

 

 BoldKara   I will post episode 7976 and 7979-7997 and 8330-8389 as soon we have enough storage again.

Edited by Jennybold1974
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have seen episodes form 2012 on till 2021 on torrent sites, so may be if we have to decide we can delete the years after 2012.

I have thoese on storage so it will be no problem to upload them again when we have space.

But let's wait

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members


Which is why the (understandable) groaning about the Liam merry-go-round amuses me. It is nothing new for B&B. It just used to be Ridge going back and forth and back and forth and grown women making stupid choice all the time and the incest, oh the incest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^^

I think the main difference is that back then the show actually had more than one story going on simultaneously. Even Ridge's waffling between first Caroline and Brooke and then between Taylor and Brooke never dominated the show so completely as Liam's waffling does now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thank you for the constructive suggestion. 
    • But how is it "apparent" that she signed a new 3-year contract? Your wording had a voice of authority -- as if you knew it was true. A better way to post about it? Say you read online that she signed a new contract, but have no idea if that's true.
    • This interview actually reminds me a bit of Kim Zimmer’s press during the infamous clone storyline on Guiding Light, or Deidre Hall during the possession story on Days. All three were seasoned daytime veterans who made it clear they valued airtime for their characters, not just being part of a romantic pairing. It seems that idea was part of the pitch behind these bigger-than-life plots. They all took big swings in their performances. When I read Kim Zimmer’s memoir, I thought she captured it best — she wanted to be respected for being willing to take those risks. To paraphrase her, she knew it was ridiculous for Reva to think she was pregnant after menopause, but she still threw herself into those scenes and made them real. That’s what really struck me about Victoria Wyndham’s interview too. She responded like a real person. It felt like she was telling Michael Logan that she knew Justine — and a geriatric pregnancy with twins — was totally preposterous, but that she still deserved credit for trying to keep the show alive and entertain the audience. And honestly, I think that's more than fair. Logan is looking for a reductive answer for who is to blame.  And, she's telling him to accept that they were all well-meaning.  Which is not a defense of bad storytelling.  But, I understand that she's frustrated because she interpreted Logan's critique as a lack of commitment, and she wants him to know that she was committed! (maybe not for the best, but committed).
    • Fine, you only had to say so. It's not a problem to me NOT to post this. I have no idea what this means. 
    • Oh, really? I think we're really getting close.  What does "apparently" mean to you? To me, it means that this is something I think has happened but not something I absolutely positively know to have happened. When I use a word like "apparently" as I have here, I am doing so by intent. Can you think of a better way to communicate that?
    • Wow...I was not expecting a montage.   I know SilkPress did not!!! Poor Eva.  Lol. Funnily enough I missed that.     
    • For the record, VW thought having the twins at their ages was absurd & who wanted that story, was some group of fans, who wanted her & Carl to have a chance at having children together. Not any fans that I knew of, but supposedly they existed. 
    • Brandon Tartikoff saved NBC primetime. Brandon Stoddard got ABC Tuesday to rebound and put an end to the Aaron Spelling hit factory.
    • Awwwww Brad. I know I shouldn't, but I feel bad for him 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And yeah, agreed that Dante having animosity towards Gio is very forced and contrived. And it also has me concerned that it means the reveal won't be happening anytime soon.
    • God, I love that woman. Another amazing interview!!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy