Jump to content

Y&R: Old Articles


DRW50

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 14.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Epperson had an extended maternity leave in 1995 which caused the whole storyline to come to an halt, start again, and sputter out. I’m guessing more time with family and perhaps just being over it as the show was devoting more time to the next generation of female characters.  TEB had just moved over to B&B as well. 

From an article 11/11/95:

After seven years on The Young and the Restless, Brenda Epperson-Doumani is leaving the role of Ashley Abbott. Her contract expires this fall. A show rep wouldn't comment on whether the part will be recast, but there is speculation that it will be. "I'd been contemplating leaving for a while," Epperson-Doumani says. "I haven't worked that much at all this year."

The character of Ashley has been on the back burner ever since she married Blade. Senior executive producer Bill Bell released a statement saying: "We were unable to complete an agreement. Brenda will be missed very much by all of us." There are no details on how Ashley will be written out, but according to a spokesperson for the actress, Doumani "will be on at least through the end of the year." Doumani took over the role of Ashley from Eileen Davidson (now Kristen on Days of Our Lives) in September 1988.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks for that article! I never saw that. Seems like Brenda just knew the story wasn't working and figured leaving when she could was the best option. It's a shame because we obviously could have had her for at least 3 more years and been sparred Ms. Shattuck, aka Mrs. Ex Ronn Moss

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agree.

Brenda Epperson left December 1995. Shari Shattuck arrived March 1996.

That's why Bill Bell didn't give us a Victor/Nikki/Brad/Ashley quad and instead put Christine in the Ashley role. Could you imagine Nikki confronting Shari Shattuck Ashley in the hospital when Victor got shot?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 You’re quite welcome! It’s a shame we lost Brenda, although I can’t see her doing either the Kurt or Cole stories, although she would’ve saved them on her end. 
 

As I’ve mentioned before the changing demos hurt Ashley a bit there. When Brenda took over Ashley was the #2 leading lady behind Nikki. When Brenda left, Ashley had been pushed down the ladder by Victoria, Nina, Dru, Olivia but still relatively important. By the time Shattuck left, Ashley was probably the least important female character, to the point we cared more about Esther, Lynne, Connie the secretary etc.

That Y&R’s worst acting moment I mentioned would’ve come sooner in June 1996 than in October 1997

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I say when ED left in 1988, Ashley was the #3 female, behind Cricket and Nikki. Remember too that ED departure and MTS pregnancy leave overlapped. 1989 was the wonky year with the females, with Bill Bell's new pet Cassandra becoming the #2 female after Cricket, BE Ashley floundering until the Brad/Traci/Ashley triangle, and Nikki floundering from MTS return until the storyline with PB Jack began. 

Hahaha. Dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Don Diamont was having a "mild" degree of success in nighttime and movies around that time; his biggest "success" was The Incredible Adventures of Marco Polo in which he played -- guess who! -- Marco Polo!  lol.  After that fizzled out, he came back to Y&R.  

Sharri Shattuck shoulda never happened.  Brenda Epperson's exit was the ideal time for Bell to completely shelve the Ashley character and rethink her purpose.  Ashley had already changed so drastically from Miss Davidson to Miss Epperson -- from an assertive fireball to more of a traditional heroine -- Bell should've taken the Unfortunate Shattuck Era to ask himself what he really wanted Ashley to be.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@Broderick I think Bill Bell began losing interest in the Abbotts around 1987. First Traci role was reduced, then the Ashley and Jack recasts threw off the balance in the family. For whatever reason Bill Bell kept the Abbotts instead of replacing them with a new family.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I guess Bill didn't want to drop the family after only 5 years and face the prospect of having the audience accept another family. He'd already risked that when the Fosters and Brooks went by the wayside.

And the Williams family has also been devalued with Paul the only main character.

Jabot was as much apart of things as the Abbotts themselves so it would have been a lot to shift focus.

That being said, he dropped Dina, split up John and Jill, had to recast Jack and Ashley and lost interest in Traci. So the Abbotts were also devalued.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah I see that especially since it was 88-89 when we got an insta family with the Grainger’s lol. Thankfully the next new family, the Barber expansion was far more successful. 

I think Victor’s takeover of Jabot did help re-energize the Abbott dynamic although I’m sorry that Ashley/Brad/Traci was dropped as it would’ve given Traci a whole lot more to do. By 1991 Traci’s role had pretty much been replaced by Nina. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I didn't like Bill Bell having BE Ashley and Traci as romantic rivals. When the Abbott daughters were introduced, it was shown that Ashley looked out for Traci and was protective of her. Bill Bell kept ED original recipe Ashley and Traci in separate orbits as far as their romances and romantic rivalries went (Ashley/Victor/Nikki, Traci/Danny/Lauren, Traci/Brad/Lauren).

Keeping it real here, Bill Bell probably realized that Don Diamont was no match acting-wise for ED so that's why he had Brad original storyline pursue Traci and not Ashley.

With the way Bill Bell wrote BE Ashley plus Traci role being reduced, BE Ashley seemed like she was both Abbott daughters as one character. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Bye, Daphne... not gonna miss you.   
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • I still continue to think that Dani is written like she's been in a soap opera for 20 seasons and she's come to a point where she's completely spent storyline wise. It's a vibe I'm getting. Characterization wise... It's like she is either incredibly stupid... or just plain delusional and out of touch with reality. I choose to pick the second option. Also... to me... she has not been entertaining for months now. Ever since they decided to jump straight to... she's an alcoholic... which we didn't need at this point... the character has struggled. Her initial Ex-wife-from-hell bravado was more interesting, even though cliche.  I expect her to improve in the coming months... they used her as a clown type of character to draw in views. Now I need to see the human being. If there is one, behind the soap opera caricature.   
    • A full 1973 episode that looks fantastic in color.
    • It 's obviously cheaper to go the true crime route. Having different reporters and production teams covering a variety of topics costs more. The networks are delivering budget programming these days.
    • Maybe because 60 Minutes has kept the same formula for almost 57 years? Usually, there is more than one interview/topic discussed, like a real magazine. Dateline, 20/20, and so many others have all fallen to the one-subject formula: True crime. I mean, I'm a Forensic Files junkie and loved original America's Most Wanted back in the day, but even I think the TV market has been over-saturated with all crime, all the time. There was still that element when these shows began, but they were a segment of an episode, not the entire episode. Maybe the audience is just getting bored with such a fixed formula. If stories were intermixed with crime, some feel-good segment, and maybe something to do with lifestyle/music/and yes, as much as I have come to hate it, political issues, maybe these shows could rally. As they are - again, minus 60 Minutes - they have become tired and predictable.
    • Interesting tidbit- Robert Newman (Josh) dated Jennifer Cooke (Morgan) when they first started on Guidling Light (it was reported in the press and I think they talked about it in interviews). I did see (as a young kid) Rita having a flashback about Roger's rape of her --and it was confusing as a kid because she was on the floor leaning against her bed and she looked like she was seduced by force and her dress was in disarray, her hair was mussed, make up was a bit messy, but she looked at him with fear, disgust and confusion but the camera was in soft focus (so I get why people may say it was romanticized)--and I remember asking what happened to her and told well she is having nightmares/flashbacks of Roger not being nice to her 
    •   Like I said I wasn’t talking about characterization. It makes sense that Dani is in denial. However literally no one in the real world would accuse someone of faking a pregnancy. Why? Because it’s just not feasible. What is Dani supposed to expect from Hayley—that she’ll be hiding a pillow under her shirt 24/7? Come on. The accusation has no legs, and that’s exactly why nobody would ever go there. A far more plausible accusation—one that actually has been made for centuries—is that someone might lie about who the father is. Dani only vaguely hinted at that, but at least that angle would make some narrative sense. I’d go for a coworking space that would be home to these small businesses like Kat and Chelsea’s bag startup (the whole police station trope feels like copaganda to me)
    • I guess RTPP looked worse because it followed Another World, but it's a shame they didn't give it more time especially considering how the shows that were put on following it fared.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy