Jump to content

Nancy O'Dell takes over for Mary Hart on ET!


DaytimeFan

Recommended Posts

  • Members

From PEOPLE:

"Mary Hart is preparing to bid farewell to Entertainment Tonight – and Nancy O'Dell has been named as her successor.

"I remember watching Entertainment Tonight when it first premiered and dreaming about working for the show someday," O'Dell says. "I am honored to be the one chosen to fill a TV legend's seat and I hope I can do her proud!"

Over the summer, Hart, 60, announced her plans to leave the show in 2011 after nearly 30 years on ET.

"Leaving this job was not an easy decision, but knowing I will pass the baton to Nancy O'Dell makes that decision much easier," Hart said Monday. "Nancy is a talented and respected entertainment correspondent. We have spent many years working on opposite sides of the celebrity battlefield and I know the show will flourish with Nancy as co-anchor."

O'Dell, 44, who served as co-anchor of Access Hollywood for 13 years, will join ET as a special correspondent in January. She'll then take on the role of co-host, alongside Mark Steines, after Hart finishes out her final season on the show."

I am so, so, relieved. Nancy O'Dell has class and integrity, she quit Access Hollywood after taking a dislike to the tone of the show. Thank the lord it wasn't Samantha Harris or Lara Spencer.

I will miss Mary Hart, she is an icon and nobody will ever fill her high heels, but she has had an amazing 30 year ride which will never be upstaged. I wish Mary well in whatever she does. I hope Vanity Fair picks her up as a Contributing Editor, it's the right venue for her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Not the biggest Nancy O'Dell fan, but I respect this bitch because she had this in the works for quite awhile. She's still hot, had a huge fan following, and you know it hurts Billy Bush to have Nancy join the #1 entertainment news show.

Hopefully, Nancy will have some control over the content because ET makes Access look like the New York Times. ET needs to save the trashy [!@#$%^&*] for The Insider.

And at least it wasn't Jann Carl. You can tell that hag's been angling for Mary Hart's gig for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hasn't Jann Carl been gone from ET for a year or two now? I didn't think she ever had a chance, she was always the B List correspondent. In my mind, Nancy is the ONLY person who could succeed Mary Hart. She DID have it in the works for a while, she got out of Access Hollywood quite some time ago and was biding her time. Smart lady.

I think ET *must* change its tone because it's lowered itself in recent years to levels that it never should have touched. ET was always above reproach, now, not so much. And yet, I much prefer it to Access Hollywood because I haven't been able to stomach any of the people who host the damn thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Celebrity journalism is something I feel quite strongly about because the business has changed, radically and negatively, in the last decade.

For decades, ET and PEOPLE were 'it'...they had legitimacy and had a certain standard. Then Access Hollywood, EXTRA, Us Weekly, TMZ, Perez Hilton, STAR, Life & Style and all the rest infiltrated and saturated the market. Soon, the gold standards set by ET and PEOPLE had to be lowered in order to stay competitive. Socially, the United States has had a really sick obsession with fame develop in the last decade as the dawn of reality television and online content has made everything accessible.

This accessibility is what made ET and PEOPLE interesting, they gave you a glimpse, but they kept a little distance, a little mystery. The mystery and the magic is all gone now. I haven't read a PEOPLE in years, nor have I watched much ET. The only celebrity magazine I can read is Vanity Fair and it isn't exactly in the same milieu.

Mary Hart, from my perspective, is the last of the golden age, the last celebrity journalist who could get an A List interview, who knew all the greats and who moves in the same circles as the CEO's of the studios and the socialites of Beverly Hills. Mary Hart was a real peer to many of these actors, someone they grew comfortable with and respected. Mary Hart has cache.

Everyone else, sad to say, is an employee who deals with the demands of the Hollywood corporate machine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Shows how much I know as well. Jann was starting to dress, look, and act like a low-rent Mary Hart.

ET can stay classy and still be number one. There are people out there who are sick of hearing about Teen Mom, The Hills, Endless Dancing with the Stars recaps and tragedies, etc. CBS/Paramount should just bring back Hard Copy(my fave!), scrap the Insider and its useless panel, and just go all out trash on that show to contrast ET/Insider. ET's brand has been destroyed by trashy bulletins and stories.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Absolutely and that doesn't make either genre deteriorating excusable. ET was a good example of treating a 'light' topic seriously and with integrity. When ET covered the OJ Simpson case, it gave CNN, ABC, CBS and NBC a real run for their money.

Absolutely right. ET has been number 1 for all these years for a reason: it had class. It needs to go back to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To me all these entertainment shows are the same - Access Hollywood and ET have been in direct competition for years and they all seem interchangeable. DaytimeFan, I was surprised that Nancy left AH because of the tone considering AH is almost an exact replica of ET. I use to love ET back in the day since they got ALL the major stars and the best scoops but in recent years all the other entertainment shows reported the same stories and ET lost it's identity.

I'm a huge fan of Jackie Collins' novels especially when everyone knows she's writing about real Hollywood people using fictitious names. One of the "characters" in her book had an entertainment journalist who couldn't wait to get into real journalism because she was getting older, she knew people within the industry had zero respect for celebrity journalists, and the amount of ass kissing both she and the studio had to give to these stars to be granted interviews were insane. I always wanted to know who she was really talking about. :lol:

Are Nancy and Billy feuding? I can't stand Shaun Robinson and her fake ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nancy left AH very pointedly because of the tone of the show and how it was getting tasteless and going for the jugular with that nasty Billy Bush leading the charge. Nancy does have some famous friends (Halle Berry being the one who jumps out at me instantly, but there are others as well) and her leaving AH was very intentional because she didn't want to alienate anyone. The only one with any class on AH is Tony Potts who had a short stint at ET before joining AH (Tony saw the writing was on the wall at ET, he didn't have a shot against Bob Goen and Mark Steines).

ET has absolutely lost its identity and it's up to the executive producer, Linda Bell Blue, to change the direction of the show. Hiring Nancy O'Dell is a positive step. Nancy and Mark Steines will make a very good team. It says something that they didn't hire from within the CBS family with either Samantha Harris or Lara Spencer. Neither of them have Nancy's class and poise (though don't get me wrong, I think Lara Spencer is a blast, she's one of Kathy Griffin's friends! Samantha Harris, on the other hand, comes off as a complete moron.)

ET needs a revamp. They need to revamp the set, revamp the opening (bring back that theme!) and fire Kevin Frasier and Samantha Harris, neither of whom have ever had the chops to be on this show. Then, it's time to crawl on beds of broken glass (if that's what it takes) and sign Lisa Canning and Chris Booker as replacements. Leonard Maltin can stay and his role could stand to be expanded.

Which Jackie Collins novel was that? I'd love to read it! My bet is the character is based more on Barbara Walters than anyone else.

Nancy and Billy Bush never really got along, Nancy found Billy very nasty. And +1 on Shaun Robinson's fake bullsh*t. I can't stand her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The title track from the follow-up album Hot On the Trail is also co-written by Val Jean:  

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I read an interview with Lenore Kasdorf and she had said was asked back to GL in 1987 but she turned it down but she said now with Michael (Roger) and Maureen (Holly) back, she would be more interested in returning. This had to be around 1989 and I think in SOD (more of a where are they now? type of article)
    • Beyond what was listed, I think there are a few other moments early on - Nixon tested the waters of having a black female character in a larger supporting part on AW, helping to pave the way for Carla and Sadie on OLTL. Rachel/Ada is in some ways a template for Carla/Sadie, although Carla was much more tormented and her scheming was from preservation.  Jordan Charney eventually arrived at OLTL after his AW success, although that was not duplicated. Doris Belack's success was, several times over.  
    • Jonathan Kellerman has written 40 novels centered on the character of Alex Delaware, with the first being When the Bough Breaks from 1985. One of the aspects of the series which I find so appealing is that characters grow, evolve and change as time goes on. They act and react in a believable, human fashion. While each book tells one complete story, certain relationship threads can continue as the series evolves. Occasional references to the past (from previous novels) also make the readers feel like we know the characters intimately; that we are "living" with them through the years. Actor John Rubenstein (of the 1970s' TV series Family) narrates the audiobooks, and he is perfectly cast. I've never read or listened to an Alex Delaware story which I did not enjoy.
    • This was me! I finally got caught up yesterday and even then, I still may wait until Friday to binge these two episodes. I find that I can watch GH in the background because the pacing is so slow but I must be able to devote my full attention to BTG because so much happens.
    • GH 4-29-25 At the Savoy with a packed house BODY SHOTS!!! https://www.instagram.com/p/DJGRyEaJBYm/ This one has legs. 
    • Article discussing the state of daytime in 1971. The 3 networks were competitive for the first time thus leading to the 'daytime wars' of the 70's, with shows cancelled, soaps expanding etc. The high drama of network daytime CBS, reigning champion of the dollar -profitable weekday schedule, faces toughest challenge in 13 years. Although CBS is virtually unchallenged as the ratings leader in nighttime, the picture in daytime, where CBS also leads, is as different as day from night. To begin with, costs of programing are much lower in daytime than in nighttime TV, and the profitability thus potentially higher. For this reason alone, network rivalry in this area is traditionally intense, although not so frequently subject to public view. This year, particularly, the developments in daytime programing are dramatic. It is the first time in 13 years that CBS has been threatened seriously. It continues in the leadership position, but both NBC and ABC are nipping at its heels; in the season to date, CBS is but three tenths of a percentage point ahead of NBC, and but two-thirds of a percentage point in front of ABC. Average ratings for network programing in the daytime periods (Monday - Friday, 10 a.m. -4:30 p.m. EST) this season stand at CBS 7.6, NBC 7.3 and ABC 7.0, giving CBS an edge of 4% above NBC and 9% over ABC. In the similar period of 1970, CBS's lead was more impressive: 8.4 vs. NBC's 6.9 and ABC's 5.9. It is necessary to go back 13 years to find an NBC daytime performance comparable to this year's -and only twice within that period has NBC showed up as well. In the 1958 -59 sea- son, CBS and NBC were in a tie-a 7.7 rating for each -while ABC was a poor third, just starting on its historic "Operation Daybreak" (in which ABC began the so- called scatter plan in daytime, with advertisers buying participations). ABC's rating then: 3.6. NBC again broke through in daytime in the 1961 -62 season: CBS 7.6, NBC 7.1 and ABC 4.1. In the intervening years, daytime television on the weekdays belonged to CBS. It was at perhaps the crest of its leadership in the 1965 -66 season. CBS then had a 4.5 percentage -point advantage over NBC (CBS 10.6, NBC 6.1 and ABC 4.7). CBS officials place the "big turn" in daytime in the 1962 -63 season with the catchy power of the Password game in the lineup. In that season, CBS came up with a three -percentage -point lead over NBC -CBS 9.2, NBC 6.2 and ABC 3.9. From then on it was CBS by a comfortable margin, season after season. ABC's daytime performance has followed the upward curve. While -as CBS officials readily concede -CBS had perhaps nowhere to go but down, ABC could experiment in its scheduling, and hopefully only go up. It did, but not immediately. After a steady climb, ABC's breakthrough occurred in the 1969 -70 season (CBS 9.2, NBC 7.1 and ABC 7.0) with the network gaining ground with its game show scheduling of such vehicles as Let's Make a Deal. Although ABC failed to hold that showing in the 1970 -71 season (CBS 8.9, NBC 7.6 and ABC 6.4), it is now performing at its best daytime level in history. ABC authorities say that network has been building for what might appear to be at least near parity in weekday programing. They cite Let's Make a Deal as having "started things up" with General Hospital and One Life to Live giving additional impetus to the movement. From ABC's point of view, the crucial change in daytime audiences occurred in 1969 when audience shares foretold a "big difference." The real improvement and change in daytime, they say, started in the third quarter of 1971. That followed a repositioning of two daytime staples -ironically Password, CBS's 1962 -63 vintage powerhouse, and Love, American Style. The former series was punched into a new spot in the schedule last spring: Love followed in the summer (the series is still strong in ABC's nighttime lineup). Although ABC executives speak guardedly of daytime audiences more on a level with those of CBS and NBC, the two challenged networks demur. ABC, they note, is nowhere near parity in daytime, although the improvement is admittedly impressive. For one thing, they contend, ABC does not program during the same hours as do NBC and CBS, and ABC carries one hour less than the other two networks in the daytime period. Moreover, they claim the hours that ABC does not program are those with least audience potential. (CBS and NBC start the schedule - excluding Today on NBC and Captain Kangaroo on CBS-at 10 a.m., take a hiatus for a half -hour at 1 p.m., return at 1:30 and program through to 4:30 p.m. ABC starts at 11:30 a.m., does not pause at 1 p.m. but continues through to 4:30.) ABC counters that not only are daytime clearances holding this season, they are actually showing improvement. In numbers, ABC is clearing an average 153 stations live (88.2% coverage) and an average 26 outlets delayed basis (4.4% coverage) for a total 179 stations representing a 92.6% coverage. Last season, clearances were 149 stations live (87.7% coverage), 27 on delays (4.4% ) for a total 176 stations representing a 92.1% coverage. NBC authorities state flatly that their network is in its "strongest daytime position in 10 years -since late 1961." They note how the margin has narrowed between NBC and CBS since last fall; assert NBC has invested money and time in daytime serials, while CBS's "are wearing thin" (the researchers at NBC point to a general lowering of share levels of CBS drama serials in 1971 vs. 1970). ABC's assessment agrees, and also emphasizes the drop in appeal of CBS's soaps, intimating a possible loss in "quality control." CBS, while not denying the declines in its soaps, refuses to accept the implication that the drama serial may be curtailed. (CBS has eight soaps compared with NBC's five and ABC's three). Four of CBS's shows are Procter & Gamble vehicles: As the World Turns, Search for Tomorrow, Guiding Light and Edge of Night. CBS authorities say you can be sure P &G as well as CBS programers are working on plans to strengthen their respective properties. CBS officials contend the drama serial not only is still well up in share (although off from prior years) at the network but continues as the most "flexible" among daytime entries. If a game show starts to plummet, they say, there's not much that can be done to "change" the format. With soaps, a fall -off in viewer interest can be countered by extensive changes in storyline and /or characters; a role can be written in or out of a script almost at will. CBS cites just such a turnaround accomplished with Love is a Many  Splendored Thing. Fred Silverman, then in charge of daytime programing at CBS (and now in charge of the whole ball game), effected a series of changes until "only the title and the music were recognizable." The surgery worked. For years, CBS has been conscious of the adage that change for the sake of change, when the network is on top, entails needless risk. But the numbers have changed now and CBS must contend with the altered picture. "Everybody is ashamed of daytime," one CBS executive admits. Changes will be made. The first quick snip comes Dec. 20 when My Three Sons replaces The Beverly Hillbillies in the 10:30 -11 a.m. period. Hillbillies is one of three shows rated lowest on the CBS daytime schedule -the others are the seemingly tireless Lucy and Gomer Pyle (the latter, at least, considered by CBS officials as a candidate for cancellation.) Snips two, three and onward may be expected to follow in rapid succession.
    • That's me - in a nutshell. But, it's because BTG is so damn good! I also wondered who was watching soccer during the day, mid-week, or even watching soccer at all. However, I know SOOOO many people that never followed soaps that were downright shocked that a new soap premiered in 2025. Why? Because they didn't know that people still watch TV during the day, mid-week, or still watched soaps at all. Many also didn't realize that soaps streamed, too. So, I feel foolish, but I guess I don't have all the answers with regard to the programming of major TV networks. I'm glad they have people that focus on these things, because that is how we got BTG in the first place.
    • Kelly looks so good in today’s episode (taped mid-March). I’ve always maintained Kelly looks fab in blue, and when they keep her hair straight like this. When they curl her hair, I feel it doesn’t suit her beautiful face.   

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thank you @BoldKara. I hadn’t realised it’s only a few months away with the current YouTube uploads. I’m happy to wait until then - hopefully they won’t skip the episode this time around. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy