Jump to content

DAYS: Behind the Scenes, Articles/Photos


DRW50

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I won't bore anyone with how special Jack (Matthew Ashford) and Jennifer (Melissa Reeves) were to me as an impressionable child, but just know that they were and because of that I'll go even farther and say if we can't have Melissa Reeves as Jennifer, than we should never see her again. One of the reasons, amongst many, RC's DAYS is so soulless is because he'll recast anyone and anything at the drop of a hat. If the show has to have a new face, slapping an established character's history on them means nothing. It's like all these reboots and continuations of shows past that networks/streamers are desperate to make happen. They all suck in comparison to their originals and make you yearn for what used to be and what will never be again.

Edited by Bright Eyes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't parse this. Is there a word missing? 

But, I would point out that daytime is known for its successful recasts. Soaps couldn't do their thing if it wasn't for recasting. Susan Seaforth Hayes is Julie #4. In this instance the way Jennifer Rose was written for Cady to play is as Jennifer Rose is & was. She certainly was not a drastically different person. Difference is a question of degrees. Personally I think the problem some fans have with Cady is that she's not Missy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you!! I’m also of the opinion that characters like Jennifer and Kristen should just never be used again if they can’t get Missy or Eileen. I also feel the same about Carrie, Billie, Jack, Eve, pretty much any longtime fave. 

Donna, I’ve said that at least twice now. We Jnj fans don’t like McClain because she ruined our couple. And if you have to rewrite a character to fit a recast, DON’T USE THE [!@#$%^&*] CHARACTER!!!!!

And yes, soaps, including Days, have had successful recasts before such as Drake Hogestyn and Robert Kelker-Kelly. However, Haiduk and McClain are NOT successful recasts! Days has not had a successful recast since Heather Lindell and that was twenty years ago.

Characters become popular because of an actor’s portrayal, not the writing. It is Eileen’s idiosyncratic, nuanced performance that makes Susan and Kristen great characters. It’s Missy’s appeal and charisma that makes Jennifer a great character. The recasts can’t pull any of that off which is why the characters simply should never appear again if the originals are not available. 

Edited by Lye-C
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think they necessarily changed the way they wrote Jennifer for Cady.  As far as the initial Cady arc is concerned with Jack/Kate . . . ummm Lauren Koslow didn't even know what the hell to do with that and she sells almost everything.  That was beyond random and everyone struggled with that "reveal" . . . Missy would have, too.

So I am a massive Jenn/Missy fan, but to be honest, I think Cady played what was on paper--the writing, since 2000, has favored Jenn as a stuck up ice queen . . . it's Missy who has (sometimes, not always) played against that and infused all the spunk and warmth historically associated with her Jennifer.  But Cady's stiff upper lip WASPy stuff is totally what's on paper.

I will happily take Cady if it means we get see J&J on a semi-regular or, ideally, contract basis.  Sadly I think Missy only feels available for very rare appearances, like holidays, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I’d rather they free Jack from the faux Jennifer by killing her off or divorcing him.

Jack and Kate wasn’t entirely random. She wanted to sleep with him in 1993. JER had an affair story planned out for them but Matt complained about it because he didn’t think Jack would cheat with an infant daughter at home so the story never happened.

Where are all my fellow Eileen fans? Maybe we need to do a Twitter blast to show Days we want her back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What a welcome, reasonable perspective! And, me, too! We don't have nearly enough Hortons! It's better for Matt to be working at DAYS than not, etc. !! Julie's gonna need people in that house now more than ever. No, Chad, Thomas & Charlotte do not count! And, furthermore, killing Abigail was a huge mistake. 

Well, there's me. I am one of the hugest fans of ED. Only I don't agree with you, so you only want ED fans who agree with you. BUZZ! Thanks for playing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She has returned in 2017, 2021, 2022, and 2023. Where are you getting this idea from that she doesn’t want to return? Has she said something since filming last year’s Thomas scenes?

I’ve never claimed to be a “true” Days fan. My loyalty has always been to Reilly first and foremost which is why I originally quit watching in 2006. I am a fan of Reilly, his storylines, and his characters and cast.

You must have me on ignore because you clearly haven’t seen the multiple posts where I’m advocating for Eileen to reclaim her roles even if it only means appearing once or twice a month. Better to have any Eileen than no Eileen (although no Eileen is still preferable to a recast). 

Edited by Lye-C
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

From Eileen's own words printed in the press?  She doesn't want a full time gig at Days and Days wants a Kristen.  SH fills that role and is available.  I don't like it, but it's not like ED wasn't offered the role back or anything.  

I wish Vanessa Marcil was on my screen everyday as Brenda, but that's not a possibility at this time.

Some things are what they are lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I’ve been saying I want Eileen back as Susan and Kristen even if it’s only one or two episodes a month. I have never said anything about a full-time gig. She has made time for Days in 2017, 2021, and 2022 while also appearing on the Y&R. Appearing every month in an episode or two is not “full time”. 
 

The recast hadn’t appeared in months prior to this week and she has only appeared as Susan in a handful of episodes over the past 18 months. Eileen could easily be doing these guest appearances. 

 

Edited by Lye-C
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Scott and Melissa Reeves have two children, Emily born in 1992 and Larry born in 1997, who have blessed their parents with four grandsons in the last three years.

The couple resides in Nashville, Tennessee.

I'm sure missy will agree to participate in Doug Williams death story if asked. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think Joss does know the material and maybe just plagiarized some of Emma's data?   Despite all her actions I do think the show pretends Joss is smart and this class is sort of in her new wheelhouse as a degree. Gio playing Carmen was super high pitched to me.  He's a talented musician but that was screechy lol. TBH, we all know I love Sonny to a fault, but I would rather stare at Rebecca Herbst's opening picture for an hour than listen to Sonny and Jason blather on about giving up the mob.  You can even try to fake me out at this point.
    • Denise's daytime/soap resume courtesy of Slick Jones' Soap Hoppers thread THE CLEAR HORIZON         Lois Adams       1960 BEN JERROD                        Emily Sanders     1963 GENERAL HOSPITAL          Lorna Hill            May 1965 DAYS OF OUR LIVES           Susan Hunter Martin Peters    1966-73 GENERAL HOSPITAL      Dr.  Lesley Sullivan Williams Faulkner Webber Webber   1973-84; 1996-09;(occasional); 2013; 2017; 2019; 2021 ABC AFTERNOON  PLAYBREAK    "The Gift of Terror"    Laura    4/5/1973 HOTEL                                 Gail McClain         1984 ANOTHER WORLD             Mary Callahan McKinnon (LaSalle) McKinnon   1986-89 SUNSET BEACH                 Sister Beatrice         1997-98 PORT CHARLES Dr. Lesley Williams Faulkner Webber 1999
    • Well as I sit here waiting for my new episode to load on my system, I'm rewatched Friday.   Say what you want, but I will always live for the Dupree family moments. And I love how much Vernon and Anita were being there for Nicole. Tag-team comforting. That was just cute.   I also love...and I've said it before...how BTG does what Y&R used to do with major characters who you think are not going to be in the episode. Have them pop up later in the episode. It was a nice surprise to see Eva appear halfway through. And I knew at some point that SilkPress Sheila would wind up at that house alone with Nicole. Still gasped since it was the only time she was in the episode.    Another thing that I'm loving has been as we are dealing with fallout from the SilkPress storyline which has been the A story...the writers are finally developing the OTHER A story...that's been in the background. That being Martin's Secret. Love the foreshadowing throughout. From Dani vs Bill and asking what else he was hiding to Kat/Smitty talking post another Martin outburst...which are building...to those unexpected Bill/Smitty scenes. Shame on Bill for planting seeds in Smitty's head.    And the unexpected combo was also great. Vernon/Nicole. Kat/Smitty. Bill/Smitty. Even getting another Martin/Ted scene in. I liked that characters aren't just sticking too much into story bubbles.    I definitely enjoying all the fallout from the SilkPress/Eva reveal. Eva might be done, but she ain't out. And I continue to get SMG Kendall vibes. Was she wrong? Yep. But she was partly tricked, too. So she definitely has an underdog vibe written all over her for some redemption. And one of the best plots on the show continue to be Kat vs Eva. So Kat seeing Eva getting closer to Tomas is only going to make that rivalry worse. It's been interesting to see the effects on the whole Richardson family from Nicole to Ted to Martin. And yes, fingers crossed that Martin stays triggered...since it feels like it's building onto his secret.    Oops at Nicole finding out Andre knew about Ted. I do wonder if she might say it to Dani. And then Dani winds up breaking it off permanently with Andre. And yay! Vanessa showed up for her BFF.   I'm enjoying the C plot of the homeless woman. I totally think there's more to her. And it gives Naomi and Jacob a story. I'm sure I've said it before, but I do wonder if it will tie into the crooked cop story or even Joey somehow. And good to see Ashley and Derek...ironically in a C plot.    And good to see we got three cliffhangers again. I hope this week does the same on Friday. 
    • I believe Cecile was intentionally used for comedic elements maybe twice. I mean, start with her being royalty from where? Tanquir!!! LOL From the first moment it's a gag, isn't it? And, her kidnapping Cass? I mean does a serious character do that? Well, literally, if you go another way & it's horror, sure. And, what you describe, a food fight, yeah, it's going to be played for laughs. Not a problem. I can respect different POVs. 
    • Y&R 1976 Pt 2 Bill is overjoyed when Jill arrives home with grandson. But Kay is furious and checks into legal action, only to find that there are no grounds (the check was returned). Brock Reynolds, Kay’s son from her first marriage, convinces her she can be the baby’s godmother and provide for him out of love.  But just as she’s starting arrangements to do this a legal petition arrives stating that Phillip Chancellor Foster is a rightful heir to and is now claiming his share of Phillip Chancellor’s estate. Jill has to do this, as the Foster family’s finances are now more precarious than ever. In fact, Liz, unable to get her factory job back, has secretly started working for Kay as her housekeeper. Jill explains to Kay that she has to do this for her baby’s sake but will drop the suit immediately if Kay puts it in writing that she will provide for them. Kay, however, retorts that Jill is the one who can’t be trusted—after all, she went back on her agreement to let Kay have the baby. Despite her attorney’s advice to work out an out-of-court agreement, Kay — insists on seeing this through. When Jill takes her little son to Phillip’s grave -on the Chancellor estate, Kay runs her off the property. In court, the geneticist testifies that Phillip could have been the baby’s father, but that Brock could have been, also. Jill then testifies that Phillip was the only man she was ever intimate with, and then only once; that Phillip decided on an immediate divorce from Kay and marriage to her, Jill, so that his baby could have his legal name. But Kay’s lawyer brings up the “dead-man statute,” which holds that conversations with a deceased person are not admissible as evidence because he can’t defend himself. When the  judge upholds this statute, Jill comes close to being held in contempt of court.  Brock takes the stand and substantiates Jill’s testimony that although he and Jill lived together for a time before her marriage to Phillip, they were never initimate. But the judge rules in favor of Kay; little Phillip’s claim is rejected. Jill emotionally tells the judge he has denied a child a decent life and a man  his dying wish.   Brad is told by Dr. Snapper Foster,his brother-in-law that his condition, nephritis of the optic nerve, is stable. The optic nerves are still swollen, but since his headaches have stopped he should continue his cortisone treatment. Brad is still firmly insistent that Leslie not be told.  From the moment they meet, Lance and Laurie charge the air around them with static. They find each other arrogant and egotistical, but when Lance needs a date for his trip to London, he calls Laurie, and she accepts. The pilot of Lance’s private plane cryptically suggests that Laurie turns his boss on because she seems turned off by him. This seems to hold true for Laurie, too. By the end of their London stay, Lance and Laurie have come to a better understanding of each other. Lance tries to tell her that, with talent of her own, she should not be jealous of Leslie. She tells him she has a book coming out, but it won’t be published under her own name. She explains further that she was an outgoing child and her parents didn’t understand that she needed as much attention as the introverted Leslie did. (Laurie has always felt she existed in Leslie’s shadow. Les is married to the man Laurie wanted, and is a successful concert artist, with the fame and recognition Laurie has tried so desperately to achieve. Laurie’s first book, a sexploitation novel, was a failure, and this new book is a novel based on Leslie’s nervous breakdown and recovery—something Leslie is trying to put behind her.) Gwen Sherman, now Sister Magdellen, will soon take her final vows, but still feels God holds her past against her, because nobody could possibly believe that a prostitute could be pure enough to become a nun. She finds her accidental meetings with Greg Foster (they were once in love) increasingly meaningful to her, and she begins to dream of Greg holding her in his arms. Finally, in torment and uncertainty, she tells the Reverend Mother she’s leaving the convent. But on the day of her release, Greg arrives with one of the convent orphans unconscious in his arms.The boy had fallen from a fence outside. When the  boy, Ramon, who had not spoken a word since his arrival, comes to, asking for Sister Magdellen, Gwen sees this as a sign from God and accepts her vocation. She will take her final vows and then enter nurses’ training.  Stay tuned...
    • I was just about to compose a post where I mention this period AW reminds me of JFP's  time on GL (1993-95) where it just reeked of cynicism and desperation. OR ATWT during Black and Stern. The common denominator is P&G. They allowed this stuff to go on.
    • I think the first 4-5 years have many strong spots, some beautiful writing, and I didn't find it that hard to watch, but one of the main issues with the show for me - and this just gets worse - is many of the characters we are told to root for I find extremely unlikeable. 
    • I don't see the people who were brought into AW around 1986 as being that different from JFP, but I don't feel like going back and forth either.
    • Agree to disagree. I think they cared. I think at times fans underestimate both the creative types & the execs. Certainly there can be specific times & specific people when ego & hubris are huge issues. But, basically, and most of the time the people involved very much want things to work. I'm not saying you don't have your Brian Frons or even your JFPs & your Susan D. Lees. We know at the end Chris Goutman had lost his way.
    • Pure bull, those scenes were.ere! The whole Liam story is going to end in disaster, just like Brad's other stories.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy