Jump to content

DAYS: Behind the Scenes, Articles/Photos


DRW50

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I mean, it probably was.  For whatever reason, Bill Bell wasn't ready to take the next step with the story, so he likely employed an extended flashback as a means of stalling.  I think all the soap scribes, including Irna Phillips, were guilty of using that method.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Possible.

I think it was the Hayes' that once said that when soaps went to 60 minutes, a lot of soaps started to include characters singing in order to pad out the runtime, so I can imagine them doing the same thing here with flashbacks

Edited by AbcNbc247
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lol!  It almost seemed like that was a weird mistake and they forgot to say cut, so the two actors just started adlibbing about change.

I am not a fan of singing.  Unless it's a Nurses Ball related thing-I prefer to not hear it.  It reminds me of GH in the 90's where you had to watch characters react to Ned/Eddie Maine singing for 3 minutes weekly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Patty Weaver (Trish Clayton) had - and presumably still has - an amazing voice.

I watched the clip of the fire, and it’s a little upsetting to see Julie sitting there hurt and crying. I didn’t like the storyline that followed it, although Lee made me laugh.

I was pretty young when these episodes aired. Was Susan Seaforth Hayes hammy back then? Or is that a more recent development? I’ve seen some daytime leading ladies like Robin Strasser and Jess Walton chew the scenery more as they get older.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

From everything I have seen SSH has always been hammy.  But it fit the times you know?  I just don't think Susan ever scaled back so that's why everything seems OTT now.  Although people like Deidre and Suzanne are much more subtle back then and are hammy now.  I do think, and correct me if I am wrong, the 60's style of acting was much different than the 70's though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL. As Caroline says, I guess it was the style. And Susan Hayes isn’t alone.

The one who I always thought gave controlled performances back then was Victoria Wyndham - Rachel on AW. She seemed more disciplined than her peers. Rachel fought a lot with Mac, but I don’t remember her getting hysterical. Even in the older clips where she’s torturing poor Alice, she’s angry but not over the top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just think it's more of a theater thing with these early actors in soaps.  They are selling to the cheap seats and haven't quite figured out a soap audience.  

I think Susan Flannery is subdued on Days (from what very little I have seen).  

SSH never really changed her style of acting and it does work for Julie most of the time.  She's just a fiery character (no pun intended about the stove fire lol).  She is just a different type of character from let's say Marlena, who is more reserved.  Julie literally is hammy and OTT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I’d call her style subtle. Flannery is another one who was disciplined and controlled. She had a career that most working actors would envy, but she should have been a bigger star than she was. She probably stayed on DOOL too long if she wanted to do primetime or features - it becomes more difficult to jump the longer you stay, because you get pegged as a daytime actor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Susan got Towering Inferno while she was on Days.

Did she ever talk about how that came to be?

Did she take much time off Days to do the movie?

But once she left Days there wasn't much.

The Moneychangers mini series got great ratings but she was one of many.

Women in White was an NBC mini series that was a possible series that never came to be.

There were a couple of TV movies.

Then she did Dallas and not much more. Was she focusing on trying to get a foothold in directing/producing in the early 80's?

She accepted the lead in Scruples but that soap got cancelled at NBC when Frons took over,I think.

So I guess by the time B&B came around she was ready and needed the work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
    • Good morning, boys!  I figured that it was time that our Gio was introduced into the hotness thread

      Please register in order to view this content

      @ranger1rg I even included a close up of his face for ya!
    • Under all of Madonna's social media today there is this wave of negative, toxic, absurd comments by Lady Gaga fans telling her how Gaga surpassed her in concert in Copacabana. I mean... Who the hell cares? Why are these fan communities so freaking toxic??? I'm sure Madonna doesn't care... But still. Have some respect for M. Leave her social media alone. Go cheer Gaga and be happy. Why come and spew hate on M??? Crazy world.
    • FYI, again, Ruth/Letitia is not in either of these 2 episodes. So that concludes the 4 episodes I had from Nov. 1983. I don't have the October episodes.
    • Eddie has begun uploading the 1990 episodes. I'm so happy about that. I was mindfully taking a break till there's plenty of episodes I can binge watch when I feel like it. Now that 1989 is complete... I can't wait to press play on February 1989 and resume where I left off.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Me when someone asks me to be proper and demure. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy