Jump to content

5 Shows Doing Better Than You Think...


JackPeyton

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The fact that these shows had to be singled out for defense suggests they aren't doing that well at all.

I'm not even sure why Housewives is on the list. People talk about ratings erosion but most know it's a solid performer for ABC and is not going anywhere anytime soon. The real problem with that show is that it squandered most buzz for a horrific second season. The characters who got the most buzz in the first season - Bree and her family - were either killed off or completely destroyed and squandered. The "mystery" of the second season was very poorly told. It just has not been for a long time and will never again be a watercooler show.

Parenthood has bled a ton of viewers since last season -- DVRs weren't magically invented this fall.

Mad Men has declined in the ratings, and Community is just one of many look-at-our-demos-no-really-please-please shows on an NBC which is drowning in niche.

I don't know if anyone thinks Mike and Molly is doing that badly. If anyone objects to the show it's because the show is crap, yet another ode to making fun of overweight people, belched out by some of the most tacky producers on TV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Desperate Housewives had over 23 million viewers in the first season and it had a bit more than 12 last Sunday. Half the original viewers left. Not only did it squander the buzz, the show chose a wrong direction in which to develop the characters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Members

According to wiki, which cites ABC Medianet, DH averaged 23 million viewers its first year. It was gigantic. Last season's average was 14 million. So yeah, huge drop.

In retrospect, I think the main reason why I dropped DH was because they'd spent the whole first season building this atmosphere and these dynamics between all of the characters, and then in the second season, instead of working with the foundation they'd built, they shoehorned another mystery, and then the next season was another mystery, and then another, and then another, and then another. And each one was about a new set of characters we really didn't know yet, while the original characters were given ridiculous side storylines. It was just...annoying, and frustrating, and I found it much easier to stop watching than to continue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, the 2nd season definitely took the wind outta their sail, but overall I find it highly entertaining and I still tune in. Yes, 23 million is HUGE, especially for a network show in this day and age, but 14 million is also a top contender nowadays.

But yeah, I wonder if their numbers would still be higher if they hadn't dropped the ball so badly in season 2. I thought they regrouped nicely in season 3 and so on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Leslie is an extreme liar and manipulator. I'm not sure what her point was in trying to convince Nicole she wasn't trying to hurt her. As much as Eva did help orchestrate the entire plot I feel like there was too much piling on. Eva never said she wanted to be a Dupree so Anita was extremely out of line for that comment.  
    • Thanks!

      Please register in order to view this content

       That's positive and something to look forward to for sure, because you're right, 1996 so far isn't nearly as good as 1995. Ohh - what is Lonatrat?  Sadly you're probably right. I did feel like David was rarely seen once Marcus came on. That would have been an interesting spin, having Frank and Tina be teenage lovers and Dahlia really being his daughter. I'm getting the sense that Tina won't be seen too much anymore, as she just left Dahlia with Frank/Eleni as she's heading to jail for a while. I like the Tina actress too!  Her voice sounds a bit like Rosie Perez to me, which I love. I tried to find her online, but coming up empty. This was the only thing I could find about Tina Crede - a character snapshot video with clips and stills of her (randomly starting just before the 1:00 mark):

      Please register in order to view this content

      That's wild that the David actor is nearly 40 here! Definitely surprises me.
    • 5-6   Meh. It already looks like a scattershot week.    5-5 was actually a good episode. Damian and Lily. Phyllis finally going on the warpath that I knew she could get on with Billy and Sally. Nate started to question Audra and Victor's alliance. And I was not even bugged by Kyle and Claire.   But then there's Cole's off-screen story. Kyle and Claire going back to being whiny. And them even wanting Adam's penthouse just sounded like trying to keep the set around. And Diane shouldn't even give a flying frak about Billy's opinion. And Tessa, Daniel, and the guitars...yeeeah no.   But hey...JM looked good in that short. And those pants.  I agree. One of Y&R's good points with fans has always been that you do at least see the vets. And IN stories. 
    • One of the things that I found unnecessary and a bit disturbing about Ambitions was that in almost every episode someone was holding or shooting a gun.  Jamey and Ron seem to have the same fetish.
    • I had thought that there was a Tommy Biddles on there, but then I realized I was thinking of Dr. Biddles on Santa Barbara. Never mind! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I have watched the scene where Vanessa reads the letter and it's lovely, but I'm really glad now that I never got around to watching the funeral. Henry ADORED Nola! He treated her like a daughter and Stacy like a granddaughter. That's why Vanessa couldn't stand her. He was crazy about all the Reardons. He spent a lot of time at the boarding house. He and Bea--they never explicitly said it was romantic, but they certainly were loving friends. This sounds worse than Bert's funeral. I really did not think that was possible.
    • It always bothered me from the start that Nicole just took Mona's suggestion and never checked references.  A real psychiatrist would have done more before hiring someone. ** I like that Kat's reporter/investigative type instincts caused her to be suspicious of Eva from the start, and to try to spy on Eva and catch her as weeks went by. However, I think that Kat's so focused on what Eva did wrong -- that she won't see that Leslie is the master manipulator, making some things appear different than they actually are. I hope that Shanice's natural snoopy nature will get her to figure out what actually happened to Laura, and who really caused all the problems. *** edit to add: The show never specified what Mona's job was for Nicole.  Home manager?  Office manager?  Head personal assistant?  I'm sure there would have been a title?    Mona asserted today her upset with Eva and with Leslie.  That they used her and ruined her reputation.  I just wish I knew what Mona's job was. If Mona was an official manager, then it would have made sense for Nicole to trust the recommendation, if Nicole thought Mona had done a proper hiring procedure.  But if Mona is just an informal helper, then why wouldn't Nicole order a background check?
    • And I'm here for it.   Also...YES, PLEASE. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy