Jump to content

MTV Reinvents Itself


Sylph

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I love MTV shows.

I watched the Teen Mom reunion thing today with friends, and everyone was crying. I watched jersey shore with cousins, and everyone was laughing. the challeneges are always entertaining, the real world (sometimes), made, true life, if you really knew me all really make me think and question things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I agree with you on most points. I think Teen Mom is great, I was crying on the reunion also (except on the Amber parts. I do not feel sorry for her one bit & I think she needs to be put in a cage with some rabid bears where she belongs. Also I cannot stand Maci!).

I think Jersey Shore, Made, True life, & also World of Jenks are all good shows and I still tune into them. As for the Real World....ugh. I haven't been interested since the Denver season. The challenges are still fun though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, RW has sorta rebounded in the last year and a half or so. Brooklyn, DC, and NO were all fairly decent. Cancun, not so much.

I just wish they'd shock the f!ck out of everybody and have the new cast think they're headed out to a notorious party town only to have their little GPS system direct them straight to a farmhouse in the middle of nowhere. The "real world" consists of more than just big cities. Not everyone ends up in NYC or LA. Send 'em down da bayou.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This version of Skins won't have any gay male characters? Hrmmm

I admit, I was a big fan of the UK show--first as a guilty pleasure, then I grew to honestly really love it, then the new cast came in and I was iffy again, but they won me over as well--though like many UK fans the utter slap in the face of this season's non ending kinda made me lose interest--for now (I have friends who went on big dramatic "never going to watch again" moments about it--I wouldn't go that far, but...) The thing with Skins is with each episode focvusing on different characters and often with different writers, the show lurched quite wildly in terms of style and quality week to week (I admit in many ways this is one of the best things about it). That said, I did have to quit thinking of the kids as "real" (I'm sorry--I know that high school students drink, do drugs, have sex, etc--trust me, I was one of them--but nothing to the extent shown in the show) and more as an extreme and slightly surreal take on teenagers.

Anyway, the UK producers have been trying their hardest online to keep fans from prematuraly bashing the remake. And to be fair, they're invested in this--it's not like when Russell Davies just sold away his Queer as Folk concept for a remake--some of the writers and I believe the production house are involved in the MTV version of Skins as well. And I appreciate from the ads that at least it's not a LOT more glossy the way US remakes invariably are...

But I kinda agree with fans that this doesn't show all that much promise--a simply changing the locale and accents won't necesarily work. Still--I suspect it'll be a hit for MTV, at least with viewer numbers and in the short run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They kinda dropped the gun on Maxxie by Season 2 though he still had some good (but brief) stuff with his new bf, etc. Skins *is* style over substance, but at its best, the way some movies manage, the style became the substance and it could be oddly moving or powerful. I think it'll be hard to maintain that in the US even with some of the same creative team.

But hold on--so will this version recreate the characters and stories more or less of the first two seasons? Cuz I thought it was meant to be all different characters, the way the UK show is every two years anyway--and not simply what Queer as Folk did so badly--change some names but try to redo the same characters/stories.

*edit* nevermind, they're doing EXACTLY what they did with Queer as Folk's remake. Sigh.

"The first episode of the US series will mirror the first episode of the UK series, although it will deviate from the original plot in following episodes. The characters are also the same, although some names have been changed, such as Sid has been renamed Stanley and Cassie renamed Cadie. However the biggest change comes in the form of Tea, a lesbian cheerleader who replaces the UK character of Maxxie"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I believe Cecile was intentionally used for comedic elements maybe twice. I mean, start with her being royalty from where? Tanquir!!! LOL From the first moment it's a gag, isn't it? And, her kidnapping Cass? I mean does a serious character do that? Well, literally, if you go another way & it's horror, sure. And, what you describe, a food fight, yeah, it's going to be played for laughs.
    • Y&R 1976 Pt 2 Bill is overjoyed when Jill arrives home with grandson. But Kay is furious and checks into legal action, only to find that there are no grounds (the check was returned). Brock Reynolds, Kay’s son from her first marriage, convinces her she can be the baby’s godmother and provide for him out of love.  But just as she’s starting arrangements to do this a legal petition arrives stating that Phillip Chancellor Foster is a rightful heir to and is now claiming his share of Phillip Chancellor’s estate. Jill has to do this, as the Foster family’s finances are now more precarious than ever. In fact, Liz, unable to get her factory job back, has secretly started working for Kay as her housekeeper. Jill explains to Kay that she has to do this for her baby’s sake but will drop the suit immediately if Kay puts it in writing that she will provide for them. Kay, however, retorts that Jill is the one who can’t be trusted—after all, she went back on her agreement to let Kay have the baby. Despite her attorney’s advice to work out an out-of-court agreement, Kay — insists on seeing this through. When Jill takes her little son to Phillip’s grave -on the Chancellor estate, Kay runs her off the property. In court, the geneticist testifies that Phillip could have been the baby’s father, but that Brock could have been, also. Jill then testifies that Phillip was the only man she was ever intimate with, and then only once; that Phillip decided on an immediate divorce from Kay and marriage to her, Jill, so that his baby could have his legal name. But Kay’s lawyer brings up the “dead-man statute,” which holds that conversations with a deceased person are not admissible as evidence because he can’t defend himself. When the  judge upholds this statute, Jill comes close to being held in contempt of court.  Brock takes the stand and substantiates Jill’s testimony that although he and Jill lived together for a time before her marriage to Phillip, they were never initimate. But the judge rules in favor of Kay; little Phillip’s claim is rejected. Jill emotionally tells the judge he has denied a child a decent life and a man  his dying wish.   Brad is told by Dr. Snapper Foster,his brother-in-law that his condition, nephritis of the optic nerve, is stable. The optic nerves are still swollen, but since his headaches have stopped he should continue his cortisone treatment. Brad is still firmly insistent that Leslie not be told.  From the moment they meet, Lance and Laurie charge the air around them with static. They find each other arrogant and egotistical, but when Lance needs a date for his trip to London, he calls Laurie, and she accepts. The pilot of Lance’s private plane cryptically suggests that Laurie turns his boss on because she seems turned off by him. This seems to hold true for Laurie, too. By the end of their London stay, Lance and Laurie have come to a better understanding of each other. Lance tries to tell her that, with talent of her own, she should not be jealous of Leslie. She tells him she has a book coming out, but it won’t be published under her own name. She explains further that she was an outgoing child and her parents didn’t understand that she needed as much attention as the introverted Leslie did. (Laurie has always felt she existed in Leslie’s shadow. Les is married to the man Laurie wanted, and is a successful concert artist, with the fame and recognition Laurie has tried so desperately to achieve. Laurie’s first book, a sexploitation novel, was a failure, and this new book is a novel based on Leslie’s nervous breakdown and recovery—something Leslie is trying to put behind her.) Gwen Sherman, now Sister Magdellen, will soon take her final vows, but still feels God holds her past against her, because nobody could possibly believe that a prostitute could be pure enough to become a nun. She finds her accidental meetings with Greg Foster (they were once in love) increasingly meaningful to her, and she begins to dream of Greg holding her in his arms. Finally, in torment and uncertainty, she tells the Reverend Mother she’s leaving the convent. But on the day of her release, Greg arrives with one of the convent orphans unconscious in his arms.The boy had fallen from a fence outside. When the  boy, Ramon, who had not spoken a word since his arrival, comes to, asking for Sister Magdellen, Gwen sees this as a sign from God and accepts her vocation. She will take her final vows and then enter nurses’ training.  Stay tuned...
    • I was just about to compose a post where I mention this period AW reminds me of JFP's  time on GL (1993-95) where it just reeked of cynicism and desperation. OR ATWT during Black and Stern. The common denominator is P&G. They allowed this stuff to go on.
    • I think the first 4-5 years have many strong spots, some beautiful writing, and I didn't find it that hard to watch, but one of the main issues with the show for me - and this just gets worse - is many of the characters we are told to root for I find extremely unlikeable. 
    • I don't see the people who were brought into AW around 1986 as being that different from JFP, but I don't feel like going back and forth either.
    • Agree to disagree. I think they cared. I think at times fans underestimate both the creative types & the execs. Certainly there can be specific times & specific people when ego & hubris are huge issues. But, basically, and most of the time the people involved very much want things to work. I'm not saying you don't have your Brian Frons or even your JFPs & your Susan D. Lees. We know at the end Chris Goutman had lost his way.
    • Pure bull, those scenes were.ere! The whole Liam story is going to end in disaster, just like Brad's other stories.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Joey and Vanessa's scenes are boring. Get Vanessa away from him. Anita and Eva scene was great too! Lots of good scenes in today's episode.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy