Jump to content

Downton Abbey: Discussion Thread


Sylph

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Disagreed (though 90s Merchant Ivory started to get a bit much, I agree there). Like Upstairs Downstairs--and Brideshead Revisited which this is kinda a mix of, the historical accuracy is everything. It's about how these kinds of feudal home systems completely died off--causing huge problems between 1910-1930, that's the very point. They've touched on how War affected them quite accurately actually--it's a time in history I know a fair amoutn about, surprisingly lol), although the combat scenes have been a bit meh.

It would lost at least 50% of its appeal to me if it didn't reflect in some way what was going on at the time, and became just a tamer, period version of Dynasty or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 180
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I guess for me they can't reflect what's going on at the time. It's not possible, not with the format they have set up for mass public appeal. I'd like to see a period concept with something a little different. Similar to the brief glimpses of Victorian England on Torchwood and Doctor Who.

I'm not saying I want Downton Abbey to be like those shows, I'm just saying I think they would have been better off skipping things like WWI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love me some Merchant Ivory, LOL! I do think the MI films dealt with ambiguity and emotional complexity in a way we don't see in cinema anymore -- Howard's End is an example (I couldn't stand it the first time I say it but it took later viewings to realize that this was not A Room with a View and was not going to feature True Love and Fairy Tale endings).

I don't think WWI is the problem with Downton as it is the perfect lynchpin for the show -- a defining, apocalyptic era when attitudes towards class shifted and changed forever. And the final season of Blackadder proved perfectly that you do not need big budget battle theatrics to drive home the point about the horror of war. In fact, you can use humor, five characters and one studio to make it even more poignant. Downton + WWI work best when it is the little details like the blind soldier who killed himself, Thomas so scared that he risks having his hand shot through in order to escape the front, Edith having to write letters for convalescing, traumatised soldiers (did anybody ever see the movie Atonement, by the way? There is a great scene featuring a nurse and dying French soldier illustrating just that). On a personal level, it's not just about a generation of men wiped out but a generation of women who lost loved ones or would never be able to marry -- and some of those who decided to enter the workplace and espouse a life's vocation instead.

I will be interested to see if the 1919 Christmas special touches on the horrendous Spanish influenza epidemic which swept Europe at the end of WWI and ended up killing off another couple million of people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree Cat about Downton Abbey--I actually think they do do a good job of showing to some extent how it affected women (and of course it did in a weird way give them, temporarily, more opportunities).

And I like Merchant Ivory to a point--I love most of their 80s stuff--I think Maurice actually improves on Forster's novel, Room With a View may seem overated but it's great--like Howard's End, etc--and like some of their later stuff (Golden Bowl is a flawed film, but they did an amazing job if you've read the James' novel which is close to impenetrable). But much of their later stuff is a bit style over substance I think--or even pretentious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I enjoy their '80s material. After that it starts to become more about all sorts of somewhat vacuous suffering of the noble classes, in beautiful clothes. It's well acted and produced, I just like the '80s stuff more, since it includes a much more blatant attitude towards sexuality, nudity, and that helps make the constant turmoil more believable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes it became much more... superficial or surfacy. I partly blame the source material they chose later--that had more mainstream material (in a way Room with a View, even with the male nudity, etc, was prob the start in that direction when it became such a breakthrough indie hit, and they started to view a certain audience they had--even if the less obviously mainstream Maurice followed it. In fact their 70s stuff, while not all that good much of the time, was all over the map style and subject matter). Like I said I did like Golden Bowl--it was the best possible movie out of such a interior novel, but it made no box office impact. Stuff like le Divorce is pretty awful I think. They did try to return to more sexual material with The White Countess but it's only a so so movie...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Basically, they ran out of EM Forster novels to adapt! And Jane Campion took over Portrait of a Lady so they were stuck in terms of the number of Henry James novels they could take on (BTW, I wanted to like Portrait of a Lady with Nicole Kidman SO MUCH but I just couldn't get into it. NK left me feeling cold. Like, I could see her trying to act. I wanted to see more Barbara Hershey). I guess MI did not want to get stuck doing late 19th/early 20th century period drama but I'm surprised they didn't try any Edith Wharton as that seems like it would have been a natural fit. Don't get me started on Le Divorce -- I'm half-French, and if I see one more movie where all the French women are amoral seductresses in couture and all the man have money to house a wife AND mistress, I will scream. Talk about cliche...

About Downton -- The Brits are big history buffs, especially when it comes to (a) the Tudors and ( b ) WWI and WW2. So I can see why Fellowes structured his show to hit the war at the end of the first season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Members

I've watched the first season and it is perfect soap. That first episode hooked me. I really thought the Lord was going to let Bates leave right at the end. The actor played it perfectly. At first you could see his conscious was bugging him, but he got this resolved look on his face as he walked away. I really thought they were going to give us an unhappy ending as a way of showing us how tenuous the lives of these servants really are, but then he came through.

The thing I love about this show is that the characters kept surprising me. Sure, there are some cliches, but many have been turned upside down as well. For example, for most of episode one, I was sure that Mary was a heartless bitch and Edith was the good sister. I figured that eventually Mathew would come to see that and Edith would be the one he went for. Totally predictable. But then when the Duke showed up and they were going through the servant's rooms Mary said she thought it was disrespectful. Then she apologized to Bates and said she always apologized when she was in the wrong. That's when you see she does have some character.

I also like that Cora is mostly a nice and compassionate woman, but she disapproves of Bates, even after he's been there for two years she makes unkind remarks. With the exception of Thomas, all of these characters have been richly drawn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hope you watched on DVD or download and not the PBS edit--which as discussed here, was minor but did ruin some pivotal stuff.

This season has been much more of a mixed bag--it's more full on soap I think, but I like that fine and overall was pleased with it. I can't see it going on for too much longer, but I think the post war episodes next year should be interesting. And that's a good point--many of the cliches HAVE been completely turned upside down which is why its so clever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I did watch on DVD and I read the first page or so of this thread, but stopped before getting spoiled on season 2. I didn't see DA as complicated or hard to follow at all. I actually liked it that Mathew didn't show up until the very last scene of episode one. That way the audience could feel him as an intruder of sorts as well.

I love that cousin Violet is not evil. She's not some uber bitch. She's a woman of her times, a little bit afraid of all the changes around her. That line "I hanker for a simpler time, is that a crime?" , was very good. I think this is another area where they turned a cliche on it's head. Mrs. Crawly is sympathetic and makes many good points, but cousin Violet isn't wrong every time and she isn't usually mean just for the hell of it. I loved the way she gloated when she was right about the servant's (Mosley, maybe) hands. She was just so pleased with herself.

Also, I like that the family isn't completely against Mathew. They don't hate him irrationally or try to depose him through insane means. There is some snobbery, but it isn't really malicious for the most part. Even Mary seemed to hate him at first because she over heard him saying he didn't want one of the daughters pushed on him and not simply because of the money.

I can see where some people might think of the show as fluff, but I really don't. There is danger. Bates was nearly cast onto the street and might of ended up a beggar. Mary's position is quite tenuous. And yet this show isn't traumatic to watch and I actually appreciate that considering how many shows like that exist right now. I can only watch so many shows were people are being killed in gruesome ways.

I guess I won't see season 2 until it comes out on DVD. I missed it on PBS. Maybe that's for the best if they cut season 2 as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I loved Kelley Menighan! She was an MVP, especially during the show’s last few years. I always looked forward to anything she did with MM, BH, CZ, MW,  and the two grownup Alisons. Wasn’t a big fan of her with RH’s Paul. I always admired how she balanced being a vixen and being neurotic.
    • LLC can be a lot (lady definitely doesn’t phone it in), but her scenes with Rena made me wish they played actual sisters on a better platform.  Aside from JE, who is a legend so it’s no surprise when she’s excellent, Amanda Setton is my MVP of this story and she hasn’t always been great in this role. You see so much happening in her face as she’s navigating the shifts and layers of this story. She’s fully locked in. Glad Rory Gibson is getting his due on GH. I knew he had more to give than what Y&R was giving him. The writing will be a factor here as well because the character of Michael hasn’t been written well in ages (if ever, arguably). GH just can’t sustain the good stuff for more than a few weeks. Alexa Havins is a very good actress and was widely embraced as Lulu initially, but the character’s one-note abrasiveness has a lot of folks wishing she was gone at this point. 
    • It's pilots like "Hurricane Sam" and "Anything for Love" that makes me so afraid to write professionally, because, my God, what if I actually tried and came up with something just as awful, if not worse (if that's even possible)?
    • JANUARY 1974 SPECIALS ADDED... Here are the January 1974 specials which have been added to the yearly list on page 76:

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Wow, you have the patience of a saint watching through this period. I think the show does get better but it takes a while.  I won't give any spoilers about Zachary, but I will drop a slight hint: GL was probably trying to get a ratings boost by doing a story inspired by one of CBS's few primetime hits in the mid-1990s. And no, Zachary does not turn out to be a Texas ranger. 
    • Love makes everything possible.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • I like Pamela too. At risk of sounding like a "Pollyanna", story and actor wise, I love the show. The hour flies by.  My only true dislike is the way it's edited. The sudden drop offs to commercial needs to be worked on. 
    • I’m up to July 8, 1996. Aww, we just lost Ed Bauer in late June. He left to go on assignment in Africa. I don’t know if this was the actor’s decision or the show’s, but it’s sad to see a long-time vet go like this. Granted, he hasn’t really had a storyline in a year, since Eve died, but sad nonetheless that he won’t be floating around the hospital or reprimanding Michelle for dressing too provocatively. At least they held a nice going away party for him, with most of the cast there in attendance. It was a nice sendoff. Oh they also had the HIV/AIDS program coordinator from the hospital, who got to dance with Lucy. That was a nice homage and followup to the story from last year. There were some strong scenes between Rick and Michelle during the 4th of July, reminiscing about their past Bauer BBQs they had and how sad it is without Ed this year. Also with Michelle and Abby, where she told her about her grandma and their wonderful traditions. I do love Abby, she’s very sweet and way easier to watch outside of her Amish storyline. Rick is very kind to her and it really makes me like him. Ugh, what a sad day. Rick Hearst has left, unceremoniously. His last scene was at Ed’s going away party, and had nothing to do with him, sadly. Also, a new J just showed up. A much more handsome guy and a little more grown up, it feels. We’ll see how I like him. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a double voice-over in a row like this, where one scene ends with nuA-M showing up and making a statement, then voice over man says the “The role of A-M…” and then immediately a new scene with J starts and he back to back says “And the role of J…”. Wild! We’re losing so many actors and characters this year, again. Vivian has got to be the worst character right now for me. She is so weak. We’ve had so many repetitive scenes with Vivian and Holly, where Holly tells her to just tell the damn truth so everything can end, and she just whines about how she can’t do it. Meanwhile, she’s cheating on her husband, pissing off her daughter, and now she just told Charles that Griffin is hitting on her. Also, they just brought her into the Alan Spaulding and his Advantage Systems storyline, to bring down the 5th Street restoration, and it’s because the Grants made some bad investments so they wanted to make money. The writers are really driving this family into the ground, but especially Vivian. Prior to this, I rarely saw her, but when she popped in a few times, she always seemed like a fun, stylish yet snooty character who struggled over supporting David and his life decisions, but wow has she really been turned into a horribly weak person. Dahlia is now dressing up like a prostitute, while a high schooler (what??), and almost got raped (blah). Marcus saved her, but yeah, I’m not feeling this story anymore. And now they’re testing J with Dahlia and having them flirt a lot on the beach, which isn’t making Marcus happy. I can’t believe A-M announced on TV to all of Springfield the news about Amanda being the Malibu Madame. I know this was probably more of a scandal in the 90s, but today it seems sort of minor in the grand scheme of things haha. I was way more invested in this story in the beginning, when Matt was involved, but it finalized as a big dud. The “Save our Streets” 5th Street storyline is really, really boring after all these months. At this point, I don’t care who wins - Alan/Amanda or the town of Springfield. All the chanting is laughable and Alan screaming at Buzz/Reva every episode is tiring.  5th Street has been under construction and trying to be ‘saved’ for 18 months now, let’s move on. Vanessa has now passed out twice, curious to see what’s wrong with her and where this goes (finally something to showcase her!).  Also, this is where Zachary finally makes an appearance, to help an alone Vanessa come to. She doesn’t know him, but he knows her name and knows to call Matt. Someone else mentioned this, but I too feel like this was meant to be someone else at first - perhaps Marian (or my wishful thinking haha)? For a month or so, they never show his face, just a hand with a gold (very unisex, at least) bracelet. But then, not showing his face again, has an encounter with Phillip where his voice is very deep, and then again with Ed at Ed’s going away party. Based on their very short conversation, it almost seems like Ed sold him the lighthouse (we’ll see). But now he’s made an appearance in Lucy’s dream where we finally see his face, and then again now with Vanessa. He also showed face to Marah/Shayne and they recognized him, so curious to see who this person finally is and how people know of him or how he seems to know everyone. But, it was odd in the beginning - either he was supposed to be Marian, or they just didn’t have an actor cast yet. Oh and now the recent cliffhanger, Lucy is walking the beach alone, post-fight with A-M, and he’s there to say hello to her. He feels like a God-like being haha. He’s a very pretty, young man, maybe a little too young looking. I haven’t been spoiled at all on who this is and where his story goes, so it’s interesting and one of the few things keeping me going right now. Finally, the Hart/Dinah/Roger story is so draining and ridiculous. They think we’re going to root for Dinah and Hart, as they carry out this plan to make Roger go insane and become a couple in the process, but they’re really an unlikeable duo now. I used to really ‘love to hate’ Dinah, but now she’s just malicious and unlikeable. There was a really weird campy scene where Roger sees a shirtless man wearing this weird mask after he chugged the vial of Lanatrat. Now Roger is in the hospital and they keep allowing Hart to evade all cops and hospital staff, showing up to haunt Roger at every corner. Now they got Blake, Matt and Vanessa to go along with their plan in making him think he’s crazy. It’s just too much, but I will say Zaslow is giving a great performance with this ridiculous story. Oh, Quint did return home on an excavating assignment, post-breakup with his 20-something girlfriend. But they stuck him in this stupid story with Roger/Hart/Dinah, and the Native American grounds that he plans to dig up just happened to be exactly where Hart was “buried” LOL - so dumb. Annie is finally starting to take more pills and make things more interesting, which Phillip is catching onto. They keep having these two run into each other and are building a nice rapport. The only things keeping me going are the promise of Annie’s pill popping/downward spiral (since I know she’s not Josh’s endgame), Ross/Blake/Rick and the babies, Rick/Abby’s budding relationship, mystery Zachary, and maybe Michelle/J. Everything else is pretty bad and I’m looking forward to getting to the ends of their storylines.
    • Thanks for the tag @DRW50 as always!! This is an era of AMC I’ve read much about yet seen so little of. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy