Jump to content

As The World Turns Discussion Thread


edgeofnik

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 17.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DRW50

    2970

  • DramatistDreamer

    1958

  • Soapsuds

    1716

  • P.J.

    823

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Someone has uploaded a December 1992 episode I can't find elsewhere on Youtube.

Please register in order to view this content

@Soapsuds @DramatistDreamer @Paul Raven @slick jones @P.J. @jam6242 @Vee @soapfan770 @adrnyc @SoapDope @FrenchFan @Franko @vetsoapfan @Mitch64 @Reverend Ruthledge @Mona Kane Croft @dc11786 @wonderwoman1951 @Soaplovers @VelekaCarruthers @Brolden  @Liberty City @NothinButAttitude

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It WAS very plot driven...Babs changed overnight and after being friends with Tom and Margo, decided to go after Tom...for..reasons? I can see if Margo and she had a fight over something or if she really wanted Tom..plus having it a fake screw took the umph out of it..all that drama for nothing.  However, there were some great scene and I love how Babs does not want Bob, Kim or Lisa finding out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It was a rare time when Douglas Marland cut to the chase rather than do his usual, gradual build; and maybe the second time he had a character change on a proverbial dime with no real explanation (the first time being with Kathryn Harrold's Nola on THE DOCTORS).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Marland absolutely ignored his own writing rules with the Barbara "vamp" story -- but only with the speed in which it was rolled out.  It did happen overnight but there was a lot of good reasoning behind the change: her loss of Brian brought up a lot of repressed anger over past failed loves (Tom, Gunnar) and the fact that Margo DID cheat with James behind her back.  After years of being a doormat, Barbara decided to become powerful.  Granted, she did it incorrectly by trying to destroy Tom and Margo (perhaps she learned too much at the feet of Stenbeck) but after that plot ended, she quickly "evened out" and became merely strong and feisty, not evil.  I think we can all agree that Barbara became a much more interesting character because of Marland's change.  AND it gave Collen Zenk an opportunity to grow as an actress.  AND it allowed her to stay with the show to the end (a weak, victimized Babs would have been written off long before).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

 

Thanks for replying as I didn't know if I'd worded my comment/criticism that well. I agree in the long run it did work as a push for Barbara, and the show mostly got the balance right for her until Sheffer.

(sorry for anyone I didn't tag about the episode as I was half-asleep - and I know that era isn't to everyone's taste but I didn't know if any were trying to complete all of the Marland years)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As said earlier, I think it makes sense as the victim who has had enough and then decides to become hard and bitter and screw everyone else over. I don't think the speed of the change was necessarily even the problem as people can just "snap". I think the problem was that there was no explanation of the change. Perhaps there was. That was so long ago. Then again, people have internal changes without expository explanation. I don't know. Usually I'm not a big fan of drastic character changes but sometimes it doesn't bother me. Barbara's character change didn't bother me much. Perhaps because her change happened when I started watching the show so I wasn't aware of the way she used to be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It was also after my time. I remember reading about the change for years before I saw those episodes, what I have seen of them, as it is treated as a seminal moment. I just found myself not enjoying the story much at all when I got to see some of the surviving material. I think the Tom/Margo portions are what bother me most as I don't believe them. I think they were too strong to fall into those traps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks too!

Also, re: Barbara--there's always the James factor in explaining her behavior. And I'm not sure exactly who was in Oakdale at the time, but maybe Marland needed a pot-stirrer, and having an established character go dark was more expedient than bringing in someone new.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As Kevin's ex Marie was short term, the only other option would have been Shannon. I think keeping the feud between them going longer and allowing Shannon to remain a more secretive, complex character would have benefited her, rather than going from hijinks to misery as she lost more and more of her own voice. 

I do think the decision with Barbara made sense in the long term, and he gave her more layers than he gave most of his other vixens (maybe because they were good friends).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member




  • Recent Posts

    • Ambyr Michelle continues to be *that girl.* She’s just a star, period. Elevates every scene she’s in on the sheer strength of her emotional realism and charisma. Can sell any dialogue. I wish the show veered away from the B&B-style scripting. TMG/Leslie’s tirade stood out, I suppose, but she’s getting a bit mustache-twirly. And I wish DD had more to do in that episode than stand and sob.
    • Well, that was down to CBS being weak and not being willing to just pulling the plug entirely. They didn't want to commit to cancelling the show in case they needed it for their schedule basically; plus they kept showing that they were willing to make cuts if needed to be. 
    • I'm sorry but clearly what I've said is not satisfactory to you. I have now read what you have to say, twice. As it happens, my interest at this point is looking at other mislabeled files to find this other Ruth Buzzi content. I do not see any point to each of us repeating ourselves, so I will leave it here. 
    • It seemed to be your intent. coming into a thread I started and making multiple posts saying my data was wrong. In the next paragraph you say "Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why." That certainly didn't stop you from immediately saying the data was wrong, until I provided additional receipts. Why did you not check the daily episode guide (for instance, this one for the 1980's) I posted for the world to see for exactly this reason...to help confirm airdates: http://daytimeroyaltyonline.com/days-daily-summaries-1980-1989-t15361.html? That is what you should be checking BEFORE you make any posts in the future like this, trying to suggest something from my data is incorrect. You could have also messaged me and asked me why your dates weren't adding up with what the correct data is. I would have fast forwarded through that video you posted, spotted Roman and Hope and immediately have told you that was the 11/1/83 episode.
    • Jason, just let me say that it was not my intent to any way impugn any of your data  or research. I'm very sorry if it came out that way. Obviously the person I got these 4 November episodes from has mislabeled files, multiples, which I was certainly unaware of.  When I am editing it is all about what I see & hear. Later, I find time for greater reflection.  Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why.  If you find you are no longer interested in the edit, that is fine. I have no ego in this. I did it only to share it.
    • I feel like Vernon and Anita need to not be hypocrites and try and take the heat off Bill in this case. It's clear that the family used him as a fixer and especially knowing he helped with Martin's situation, they need to either be quiet or support him. BTW...with Vanessa being in the hospital for food poisoning, am I the only one who thought Shanice was gonna say she's pregnant or had an STD? The only reason I say STD is because she hasn't had any memorable sex partners, but I definitely don't believe she just had food poisoning.
    • Yeah, I mean I know that the name still pertains. I just laugh at it not now being called Arizona Dust, but, I admit it simply does not have the same ring to it. Above, that is interesting that Arizona had already come up before the crisis. 
    • Anita vs. Leslie, bring it!
    • Leslie and her family are from Chicago? Anita's background also includes being a former Chi-Town native? Might they connect this and go somewhere with it?
    • Honestly who's to say Leslie even birthed Eva, I mean she's a liar, I wouldn't believe a word she says about Eva being Ted's(or hers)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy