Jump to content

Half-hour or One-hour soap operas??


Goldensoaps

Recommended Posts

  • Members

In my opinion, the best soap operas had only 20-30 minutes...great stories...watchable...easy to watch and you have time to do other things....in my case, I can invest daily 20 min in a soap...but 40 minutes...sometimes it is too long...

Great Soaps of only 20-25 minutes....

SEARCH FOR TOMORROW (1951-1986) - 9130 episodes

LOVE OF LIFE (1951-1980) - 7315 episodes

THE EDGE OF NIGHT (1956 - 1984) - 7420 episodes

THE SECRET STORM (1957-1974) - 5195 episodes

THE DOCTORS (1963-1982) - 5280 episodes

PEYTON PLACE (1964-1969) - 514 episodes

RETURN TO PEYTON PLACE (1972-1974) - 426 episodes

RYAN'S HOPE (1975-1989) - 3515 episodes

ANOTHER LIFE (1981-1984) - 875 episodes

CAPITOL (1982-1987) - 1270 episodes

LOVING (1983-1995) - 3169 episodes

RITUALS (1984-1985) - 260 episodes

GENERATIONS (1989-1991) - 470 episodes

THE CITY (1995-1997) - 352 episodes

PORT CHARLES (1997-2003) - 1633 episodes

A total of 46824 episodes....we will need two lives to watch all of them.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Claire Labine would agree with you. Half hour soaps can be great, if the work is there. I think that a one hour soap can be fine, with the proper writers and producers (ATWT and GL did a decent job with that format for a number of years in the 80s and 90s).

I think they should consider going back to fifteen minute soaps. They would be relatively cheap and you wouldn't have to write as much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The thing is, I figure the 1hr format can work, but not for new soaps. Any new soap that's an hour is almost asking to fail, especially today. It's too much initial investment in too many new characters and the writers have a huge undertaking on them, especially in trying to build the audience up from near-zero. Even Santa Barbara might have stood a better chance as a half-hour soap wedged between Days and AW.

And as said above, Claire Labine much preferred half hours, as did Bill Bell. Look at how much Y&R initially suffered by expanding to an hour? Hell, he left Days when they made the move to 1hr as well (though I don't think the move was at all related, just convenient timing).

I think that with the ratings the way they are right now, all soaps bar Y&R (and even then, it might be wise since MAB can't write a children's show let alone soap) should contract to a half hour. Considering the shrinking cast sizes, it might do them some good and allow the story to flow more organically if they're not using the same 10 characters in stories moving at breakneck speed, though I know B&B does this anyway even at a half-hour, not like they should or anything...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like the half-hour format, and really, I think it's the definitive runtime for a soap. Not too long, not too short, and you can easily knock out a week of catching up in one sitting. In order to be good, though, the show needs to be tight. No dead weight, no stories that are going nowhere, no repeat conversations over and over again, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The thing about it is that Y&R currently runs around 37:50 an episode, B&B around 19:45. The networks have jammed so many commercials and promos, which is part of the problem. The challenge that 30 minutes shows face is that if you have a bad primary story, the show REALLY sucks. On an hour show, you have more story diversity. My favorite show is TEON and watching the 22 minute epi had a bit of this, but when primary was good -- it was awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not just Claire! Bill bell and AGnes Nixon BOTH resented the hour changes forced on them and only did it with a lot of hmming and hawing and concessions made by the networks (like Agnes getting them to promise to save the taped episodes). It's kinda hysterical to read All Her Children where Agnes goes on and on AND on about why she would never do an hour soap, all the problems that would happen, then hear him ask the cast and everyone the author asks likewise says they'd never do an hour soap--and then they bring up how to get audiences to tune into Ryan's Hope, Agnes agreed to do ONE week of hour episodes that Summer I believe (the theory was audiences would tune in a half hour earlier, and I guess after a week get accustomed to that and watch Ryan's Hope before?) She does say that for the weeks he had to figure out several major stories to climax at that time to be worthy of the extra time.

But anyway, I think it's telling if you have arguably the two greatest soap opera writers, Bell and Nixon, both fight hard to not have their shows go to an hour, and have them do so essentially against their wishes. Of course, they were used to writing half hour shows (the extra half hour really made things different in terms of how much of the actual scripts they could do, how many subwriters you needed etc) so part of it was habit. I think lots of the actors resented it because it made it much harder to be in theatre or something else when you'd often be out after 8 instead of by 5 or earlier, which according to that book I bring up apparently too much, was when AMC would finish shooting.

Then again Harding Lemay clearly seemed to prefer the hour format--maybe partly because he came from a playwriting background (Bell came from advertising, though Agnes did do a number of the Golden Age of TV liuve dramas which were essentially 90 minute plays).

I do think the hour format can have advantages. Sometimes with only 20 mins a day, I admit it feels like just as I'm getting into an episode, it's over (of course with a boring soap or episode the opposite can be true). And with more stories going on at once, often you have an increased chance of finding at least one of the stories or one of the characters on that day, interesting. In theory anyway.

The soaps going to an hour more or less coincided with the Dallas effect (well a few years later) when soaps all seemed to start featuring big indutries and more rich characters. I do think part of that may havehad to do with the format change though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, exactly. This can be a prob as I make my way through the first year of Dark Shadows--I love it far more than I expected to (I'm glad I started at the beginning and not with the Barnabas Collins stuff as I was tempted to do), but there can be 4 eps or more at a time where I'm simply tired of seeing the same five characters (I believe early on they never ever used more than five for budget reasons on an episode) and story. Even back then there were a lot of commercials--I believe each episode is 23 minutes or so. But yeah by the 90s they shrunk it so an hour soap opera is actually under 38 minutes, which is simply insanity (primetime tv is usually 42 mins without commercials--though back in the 80s it was 45 and before then sometimes 48).

That said when The City had its last year, my local ABC moved it (as a number did) to 12:35 am. I loved that--I usually stay up till around then anyway, and so I'd watch it live just before going to bed.

I certainly think there's truth in saying a new soap is asking for trouble with opening at a full hour. And yet B&B is an awful example of what can go wrong--it feels like every time I turn it on I see the same handful of characters saying or doing nearly the same thing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In the Agnes interview from 77 I have somewhere she says that she didn't want to take AMC to a half-hour but ABC basically told her she needed to without ever actually explicitly saying that.

I think that's down to lack of interesting characters or situations. When B&B was at its peak, generally the early 90s, episodes were full of more fun and better pacing and excitement. DS can also be that way, so can Ryan's Hope. But when they drag they drag.

The best use I've seen of the 30 minute format might be some of the Loving episodes -- I remember one where they had a town meeting over the Corinth serial killer and Ally and Gwyn were stuck in the care as it was filling with exhaust fumes. Very exciting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Members

I actually read a 1990's interview where Harding Lemay clarified his thoughts on the hour format. He said that it is the ideal running time for a soap, but only if the writing team is actually talented. For mediocre writers, 60 minutes is way too much for them to handle. Furthermore, Lemay stated that it was never his desire to see so many other soaps follow AW's lead in expanding to an hour, and wished that most of the soaps in the 90's would go back to 30 minutes (because of their bad writing).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Everything with Elon and Trump is a stunt. If people, and the sycophantic press, are talking about their "feud," they are not talking about Republican plans to gut Medicare, Medicaid, and the ACA. 
    • I can't fully remember, but I don't think they tried to get Beth Chamberlin back. I think Laibson/McTavish likely saw Beth as old news and wanted to move Philip on; either that or have her return only when Philip was closely tied to a new woman. Thanks as always for these recaps. I think I had stopped watching around this time and mostly kept up by reading in the soap magazines. Bridget's degradation was horrible to watch, as the character had grown so much over the years and was clearly regressed just to be a foil for a "hot" couple viewers had zero investment in. 
    • Having the majority of the cast on those low numbers is no way to tell story. And just 2 dayplayers for the month. So sad for the #1 soap.  
    • I believe it was. And this is actually one of the cases where I wouldn’t mind some dumb soap opera bringing back from the dead. They gave Mishael, Amanda, with all of Hilary’s connections but none of the personality except for fleeting moments. Hilary absolutely should’ve just left town. They decided to kill her and the baby. Just baffling,
    • That was Mal Young right? He thought a tragic death was a better option than crafting a story where Hilary leaves town. Was it a case of punishing someone who wants to leave? And then they have to jump through hoops to bring the actress back.
    • Ooo @TaoboiI will say I just watched Amanda give it to Abby and I loved it. Honestly just made me miss Hilary more. I will never understand or get over that decision to kill her off. Also call me crazy but I could definitely see the Damian actor playing NuTed on BTG. Very much still enjoying the Lily attraction.
    • I rewatched these episodes---they broke my heart. Somehow, Nola had seen Vanessa leave the hospital, and follows her home, and Maeve just lets out this primal scream---chills went down my spine. And knowing the history between them---never quite liking the other and always getting on each other's nerves (to put it mildly)---makes it a much richer to have them put it all aside in the moment and be family to each other. I've never seen/heard what Maeve thought of the story itself, but she did want a break, so it's not like she was fired and then brought back. Yes, Vanessa could be this stubborn and unwilling to ask for help. She'd pretty much always been an "I can do this on my own" type of woman, although when she first came to town, she would still run to Henry. But after she met Billy, she stopped relying on her father. It's part of the reason she (briefly) got addicted to pills after Bill's birth---she was determined to take care of him all by herself and became obsessed with the idea she was the only one who could. Of course, nothing before to this extreme. I should say, there's no way (IMO) they could've told this story---Vanessa letting her loved ones thinking she'd died---if her father Henry had still been alive. She never would've been able to do that to him. And it does chafe that she's letting Bill believe it, when her mantra had been all about protecting him since the day he was born. I honestly don't recall what I thought about it at the time. But now I'm thrilled she's free of Matt at least. LOL.
    • I had no idea Peter Reckell was 70. He doesn’t look or feel it and I guess I thought Bo and Hope were closer in age than 9 years. Wow even the new writers had to have Jack praise Leo. Melissa Reeves continues to slip back in effortlessly as Jennifer. I like Ari and Holly being old friends. Holly learning about John’s death reminded me of how John used to call her Nikki if my memory is serving me right. Doug who happily sleeps in high school Holly’s room shirtless and in his underwear is now asking about birth years. How old is he anyway?    The Cat and Chad romance is insulting. 
    • Her husband is Marty Levy. Chocolate Fortunes (her company) was started in 1987.  So that explains the mystery of 'Whatever happened to Pam Peters?' She had been running a successful business for decades.
    • KMH's Emily was a harbinger for the lack of dignity many characters would face in the last decade of ATWT. On paper, many of the stories given to Melanie Smith's Emily could have been extremely sleazy, but she was treated with respect and understanding in the writing. By 1996 the show went from often not knowing how to write for KMH's Emily to giving her outright reprehensible material. There were breaks from this treatment, but not enough, with even those breaks often being poorly written or just used to make her look even worse (like her grotesque rape story turning into her using her rape to destroy Margo's marriage).  By the last years I don't even know what the hell they were doing. Wasn't there some kind of mother-daughter whoring story with Emily and Alison? Wasn't Emily getting beaten up by johns? Whenever I think of how they wrote for KMH's Emily I'm reminded of Pauline Kael's quote about Ann-Margaret's '60s movie persona - calling her "dirty" and saying the people who made the movies "knew what men wanted to do to her."  Even as much as ATWT started hiring softcore actors in the mid/late '90s, the Emily treatment was on a whole other level. I have never known what audience they thought they were going to be attracting.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy