Jump to content

AMC: Agnes Nixons mistake


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I liked that run (except the Tanner story which I think was truly offensive and wrong headed)--even if during the spring of 97 the only ABC soap I thought was on fire was the soon to be canceled The City (it was also the only soap to have its ratings increase week to week--albeit by tiny inclements--the others were starting to tumble). But OLTL was awful then--I don't even remember specific stories, just so much of a feeling of NOTHING--like no structure, or anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For a non character like Kevin, I think it was *great*, though the actual reparitive therapy part was better, as said. Of course I was dealing with my own sexuality issues, and was Kevin's age, at the time so that may have played a part (it was done much better than OLTL's Billy Douglas story--albeit that assuredly paved the way). And I appreciated that Broderick tried to carry on with the character (even the Kelsey falls for him story, while some could say it was to avoid having a bf forhim--though he did get one--a day player--was realistic and relatable I think).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't want to take away how meaningful Kevin's coming-out tale was for you, Eric, but I had a serious problem giving such material to a character we hadn't known for very long and to an actor who just wasn't very good.

That's my problem, really, with most coming-out stories on daytime: they're always about young adults I just don't "know" as a viewer. Even Luke's story on ATWT felt hollow to me b/c (even though I'd seen Luke from the time of his birth) Van Hansis had not been in the role for very long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I admit it's largely a personal thing, but I think the actor who played Kevin actually was very good for a newbie--a lot of natural charm and comfort in front of the camera--I think he was much more than adequate. But I will agree (and did say) that it's too bad that till Bianca they had to use all these newbie characters for coming out stories--but we know that was a network thing (just like Billy Douglas' story was meant to be about Joey I think it was). Broderick WAS clever in making it seem that Scott was the one who was going to come out and keeping Kevin's secret a bit of a surprise--and after the focus on Jason and his drinking, his infatuation with Dixie, etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, Joey Buchanan was slated to "come out" before ABCD nixed the idea. Even if Michael Malone had been allowed to go through with his original plan, though, I wonder how successful he would've been for me. For one thing, there's the fact that I simply couldn't trust him to write a topically relevant story in a way that wasn't preachy and heavy-handed. (His earlier attempts at it, such as w/ the short-term arc about domestic abuse involving Viki's never-before-seen maid and her husband, left me unimpressed.) For another, Viki would undoubtedly stand by her son's decision to come out; and though Malone and his team liked to think Clint was an old-fashioned cowpoke homophobe, the Clint I know would've supported Joey's decision, too (even as he and Viki were concerned about Joey's personal safety), because being "a man" meant standing up for what he thought was right, even if it meant standing alone. So, really, where's the conflict?

Now, if Powell had come out at the climax of Marty's rape trial.... ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I liked Malone's writing a lot more than you--but I think you raise more than valid points. Still, it woulda meant we'd have a gay character permanently on the canvas (yes permanently even if he was in London--he'd still at least get mention). Having Kyle and Fish come out, in that instance was a regression (although the way Carlivati introduces random new characters with no ties to the canvas constantly and makes them the stars of the show, that's no reason for them disappearing as they have)

(I woulda loved Powell to come out--it could even be some bizarre, and granted controversial, reasoning for him going along with the gang rape--but they've completely ruined his character anyway...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow, you just sold the hell out of that Kevin story. I have to go search for clips soon (though I'd rather watch the whole thing from beginning to end -- this is where it sucks that back episodes aren't readily available for watching). Re: Bianca's "loves," I totally agree. Really, no one would have been surprised if Allen's Laura came out. I remember being puzzled as to why the naive little Disney-voice girl was the lesbian and the rough, stoner-looking girl was not. Ignorant, I know, but I was young.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just catching up on this thread and would like to add my 2 cents worth re Erica the supa model.

Yes,it was ridiculous that she achieved such success and remained in Pine Valley. I think it would have been better for her to have had some success but then be kicked back down up against the jungle that is NY. Erica could return to PV boasting of success (the evidence would be there-magazine,tv commercial whatever) so she could swan around as a 'star' and spin some story that the falseness of the modelling industry was not for her.

Yet the viewers would know the truth and it would engender some sympathy for the character.Erica would rather be a big fish in a little pond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here's my problem w/ Kish: if OLTL wanted me to care about their predicament, they could've tied them to characters who I do know and do care about. For example, I could've cared less that Billy Douglas was a closeted gay, but he was Joey's friend, so Joey's concern over the issue mattered to me. Conversely, before their story officially started, Fish was just some Llanview P.D. officer who was good w/ computers; and Kyle was just the dude at the hospital participating in all the DNA shenanigans involving Rex, Gigi, Stacy, Roxy, etc. Would it have killed Frank and Ron to make Fish Nora's cousin, let's say, or Kyle Rex and Natalie's friend from the "old neighborhood"? (The answer: of course, it would, b/c that would take something called "planning," which OLTL doesn't really do anymore.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But, see, they'd played that story already -- twice. The first time was when Jason Maxwell's murder (and the scandal over their affair) threw a damper on Erica's precious modeling career. The second time was when she came back from Hollywood, defeated and demoralized b/c she'd ended up at a fat farm after her and Tom's marriage had imploded. If Erica's career could have suffered irreversible damage, though, it should've been after Kent Bogard's shooting. She could've mounted a comeback attempt, but the lingering whispers surrounding the scandal would've done her in, forcing her to settle for life as owner and permanent hostess at the Chateau (or something).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The AMC clips that are being put up week by week with the, umm Hebrew (i think) subtitles just went past the shooting of Michael, so they should be going around there. There used to be GREAT clips of the episodes with Kevin and the evil shrink (who to be fair wasn't played evil--it was really well done) from a soap fan who was documenting all the soap gay storylines but they seem to have disappeared.

When Bianca came out Laura was already nuLaura who was much more of a lipstick lesbian ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • There has been some confusion about Michael & facial burns. Please see this post: https://bsky.app/profile/shallotpeel.bsky.social/post/3lqkrryu54226 I've chosen to put this here instead of the Classic Thread because it is now with the appearance of recast Michael that this has come up. Different places online, including at least one podcast, remarks have been made about how remarkable it is that he is without facial scarring. Other fans say it was clear from the first that he did not have facial burns. What is included in this post is 2 screengrabs where you can see his face at the hospital & a very quick edit of that day in the hospital. 
    • Put me in the LOVE KMH camp. As a poster alluded to above, her detractors seem to come from people who first experienced the 80s Emily actress. And that's often the case with soaps, myself included. I enjoy the original actor so much that I just never take to the recast. However, KMH played Emily far longer than the original - for almost 20 years - and when she had great material, she was great. I get the sense she didn't like playing the whiny oh-woe-is-me Emily which was all the material she got from about 1996 until she took over the Intruder in late '99/early '00 and got to play a stronger kiss-ass woman who didn't care what anyone thought of her. (Some would call that a bitch but, if a man was in that role, he'd just be called a smart and savvy businessman.) Her relationship with Hal was great. The transformation was done realistically and I thoroughly enjoyed those years the best out of all. Once the writers decided to break up those two, they went back to writing Emily half the time as whiny and pathetic. I preferred when the writers made her stronger.
    • Hahaha - I do. I've always been the type, though, that can't miss anything. I get FOMO, so I'll not skip episodes or fast forward anything. There are only a few TV shows I've dropped because they got so bad vs. sticking it out to the end.  The promise that GL 1997 is better is what keeps me going. I especially want to see the fallout of Blake's lie about her twins and then Annie's descent which I believe won Watros's Emmy.
    • Rita's rape is an episode i constantly search on YouTube hoping one day that it will show up. I always feel like I may have seen it, but I was only 6 at the time and can never figure any of the things I have vague recollection of 
    • FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM FEBRUARY 1973 & MAY 1973:

      Please register in order to view this content

        FROM THE VAULT: NON-SOAP DAYTIME RATINGS: HIGHLIGHTS FROM AUGUST 1973 & NOVEMBER 1973:
    • The rape was in 1979 after they were married. Blake was the result of Holly cheating with him while she was married to Ed. I believe she was born in 1975. 
    • No. Ed and Holly were married and having problems. She had an affair with Roger and that's when Christina--Blake--was conceived. The rape happened much later, after Holly and Roger were married.
    • Was Blake the product of Roger raping Holly, or did that come after when they were a couple?
    • I really wish we could see that episode...absolutely, my memory could be faulty, it was a very long time ago. I'm not going to contradict what the actors said--there has to be a reason it made them so uncomfortable that they talked about it in the press and complained to TPTB. I think that was the first one where they made the point that they wanted to educate the audience about the subject.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy