Jump to content

GH: Maude's daughter comes to Port Charles


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

:rolleyes: We need to make sure we remember she's still a lady just because she speaks her mind and is strong-willed.

More stunt casting -- GH must be getting desperate.

I guess this woman will be killed trying to protect Brenda or will be killed in Brenda's place or something?

With Adrienne and her two friends onscreen I wonder if anyone will remember Vanessa's there...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:o Nooo! But I'm all for more hitherto unknown love children of Eric's. :P Or an aunt or uncle for Erica, the woman has like no family after all these years, never a mention of a cousin or anything.

Wow, so this is really happening. Interesting. I love Bea Arthur with all my heart but a soap opera casting item with her name in it is always going to sound like a joke/hoax to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've been away from here for a long time, pop in periodically but I have to wonder which soap is going to win the stunt castint award. GH with Maude's kid or Y&R with Julia Roberts brother.

What's interesting about all this is how we have watched film stars move to the small screen allegedly taking juicy TV roles from TV stars and now we have aging TV stars taking roles from members of the soap community. Call me crazy, but I'd rather see Stuart Damon on GH over any of these recent stunt casts and none of these folks are any better an actor than he is. Or Genie Francis back.

does the soap community believe this is helping them gain credibility? Is that why? Have any of these stunt casts worked? I guess it depends on what the objective behind them is.

As far as this cast decision, Bea Arthur was an incredible talent and had success in many venues, films, 2 wildley popular TV shows, and theatre. Adrienne Barbieu, never have really been impressed with her at all. Hope this works out for Vanessa and I hope they have a better plan for Brenda than they did for Sarah Brown's Claudia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it shows how dated many of those who run soaps are now. Nothing against Adrienne Barbeau but the idea that she is a "name" who will automatically bring up numbers is baffling. And yet the genre is now so decimated that the type of derision GH got almost ten years ago for bringing in Sally Struthers is not likely to be whispered.

The thing is there are good actors who might do a great job in these roles and possibly stay around long term, yet they don't get a look in because they are not famous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well is that why she's joinging GH because she's going to bring viewers in? Exactly who are the soaps trying to attract with these stunt casts. Certainly not lasped GH viewers. They certainly aren't going to care about Adrienne Barbeau. And is it to draw in younger viewers. How many of them know or care about Adrienne Barbeau?

Maybe you're correct and these showrunners are completely out of touch with the audience of today.

As I haven't really watched any of GH over the past 6-7 months, did JJ's return really help the show at all or had it really been a bust? Again, depends on the expecations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Guza and Frons were much younger men during the days when Adrienne and her two friends were among some of the most known sights on primetime TV. I think in their mind she is a possible draw for viewers, and if not, at least someone they want to see again to remind them of what they used to be. And I'm sure someone at the show is probably thinking: Bea Arthur was on the Golden Girls which is popular, and Maude, starring Bea Arthur, is on DVD, and might have a few fans, so this might be their way of cashing in on some sort of Golden Girl luster.

I think it's also throwing anything against the wall to see what will stick. Michael Learned, Franco, the return of once big GH names like JJ and Marcil. Anything to try to cover up the stench of what is today's GH. It's the same with Y&R and their stunt casting. They just want to avoid fixing their shows, they don't think their shows are a problem, they just think they need to lure in viewers with some kind of trick.

As far as I can tell the only people who have enjoyed his return are those who loved him years ago and are still watching. Most newer fans don't seem to care and the ratings did not have any noticeable increase. The show itself has nothing for him to do, it's obvious they don't care about Lucky and just wanted to bring back an actor they loved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's sad. All the shows. Days is about the only one I follow and while it has it's moments with returns, I've been disappointing in what I've seen of Crystal Chappell's Carly. Loved her on GL, loved her on Days back in the day, but just not taken with this current run.

AS far as JJ, it's sad. I actually liked the other Lucky's and have always liked the character. JJ was popular but it was his romance with Liz that catapulted him. Sad to hear what they've done there. And while I know Greg Vaughan was not a strong actor, he was wildly popular as Lucky and incredibly good looking. I suspect many of the recent and younger viewers preferred or prefer him to JJ or as you said just don't care.

I do like Vanessa, I won't be watching but I hope her return works out for her and this casting decision is successful in terms of her story. But like many of the lasped soap viewers, I think I've just thrown in the towel. I'm one of those viewers who's given up. Nothing GH or AMC could do or no one they could bring on screen to draw me in barring perhaps Meryl Streep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Melissa Ordway announced she was moved to recurring back in November but is still credited with the contract cast members.
    • I think of Evan as a smarmy bast*rd. Maybe you'll like that description. You certainly have him pegged correctly since he is just a soldier following "Admiral" Iris's marching orders.  
    • So far the only interest I've seen from Evan to Amanda has been listening to Iris's orders to go and seduce her.  So far he hasn't been successful... but who knows. Amanda is unbearable at times. Entitled, spoiled... idiotic. Iris... so blatantly manipulating her and Amanda takes the bait. But I guess... when she gets in trouble... she'll have a chance to learn. That's what makes these shows so interesting.    Oh, no, don't worry. You haven't ruined a thing. Evan has not been on my radar that much... he was not one of the characters I was caring particularly... so nothing much has been changed for me. I don't think he has the stuff to ruin Rachel's life. He's just a pretty guy that can follow orders. Iris on the other hand... is dangerous. 

      Please register in order to view this content

        P.S Maybe Evan will surprise me. Who knows. 
    • The show has gone back to 10/10 entertainment! I'm glad that I was right in feeling that what were experiencing were growing pains. I'm sure they are not over yet, but I'll know that we always comeback to quality drama. I think it's going to be a hell of ride (in a good way) from this moment on. BTG has that magic that not a lot of shows have. I'll update more... when I'm done catching up.
    • So very glad to hear this. Yesterday I suddenly thought; OMG, what about spoilers, have I just  ruined things for Maxim in getting carried away with interest in Evan, who was so well-written & well-acted. BTW, your fan review of this episode was a sight for eyes that had not seen one of these for a little bit too long, LOL!!!  Mitch is also fascinating to me but in his case it's because he was all in with Janice & her nefarious plan & then he did this turnabout we've mentioned & he basically got off scot-free.
    • It does seem cheap and lazy for this show to have just one family. Passions was heavily criticized but it was nicely structured with a total of four families.      
    • I think it was definitely a surprising reveal in the storyline. I had a hard time appreciating Evan because I couldn't get behind his interest in Amanda. But that's because I never thought Sandra Ferguson made her a compelling character (although to give her credit she occasionally had decent emotional scenes with Mac or Rachel).
    • I'll even go further... I'll make her re-think BeLief and create a new patent. Brooke needs stuff to do. Anything other than beg or be in her panties. We need her to be creative. But sadly Bradley has a very low opinion of these characters. To him Brooke is nothing more than sex and scandal... or a pathetic doormat. Ridge is nothing more than a chauvinist pig that needs to pit women against each other to feel like A MAN and Steffy is nothing more than her father's guard-dog. I don't even want to open my mouth about Hope. She is such a fiasco in my opinion... I will not suffer if they kill her off. Bradley pooped on her character and now it's too late to fix it. Annika is great and I would hate to see her go, but slutty Hope was not her thing. The vibe was missing.     
    • I've seen Jason interact with Mitch and annoy him. That's as far as I recall. I didn't even have a slight idea that Evan had a vendetta against Rachel... That came as a surprise to me. I thought Evan was Iris's dog and that's it. Now he's definitely more interesting.
    • Thanks for these. I can't recall -- did Evan's vendetta have any position on Mitch, or was it all about Rachel? @Maxim have you seen any Frames intreracting with Mitch in any way?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy