Jump to content

An Open Letter from Ken Corday to Marlena De Lacroix


Recommended Posts

  • Members

:lol:

That was a great post Jay, I find your point of view very interesting (and agreeable). And I admit to doing a bit of a silent cheer when you referred to the soap mags as "parasites". I've enjoyed great interviews and featurey stories they've done over the years, but I've been turned off by some of the behind the scenes goings on I've read about and in some cases I think the only thing separating some of the staff members from your stereotypical kooky soap fans is the paycheck.

The worst spoiler moment I've ever experienced was watching Tammy hold on by a thread on GL and at the commercial break an ad for SID plugging their article on Tammy's shocking death. WOW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think the magazine died partly because of self-loathing. Whether a substantial or non-substantial portion of people working there in reality felt contempt for soaps or were just embarrassed for watching them, it really doesn't matter, but it was one of the reasons it ultimately crashed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You didn't miss a whole lot on OLTL in those 4-5 years. What you did miss you can find on Youtube.

I guess I see detailed spoilers as a preventative measure. I can't think of much of anything on soaps in the last 15 years that I wish I hadn't been spoiled about. What I enjoyed I enjoyed with spoilers and what I hated, I was very happy to know what was going to happen in advance. Imagine not having any idea that my favorite character on GL, Nadine Cooper, was going to be bludgeoned to death by a bad drag queen. I at least kept with the show, thanks to advance knowledge. A few years before that, I was so annoyed when Maureen suddenly died that I could barely sit through the show for months and months on end.

I think if spoilers hadn't become more detailed soaps would have even lower ratings than they do now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Isn't that something. To me, they mean I don't have to watch the show. I can't imagine anything more maddening than trying to sit through such plot-heavy material as a soap opera when I know what's going to happen. I'd rather do anything else I need or want to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For me, plot-heavy material sucks whether you know spoilers or not. If the material is character-based, then it still works, even if you know what's going to happen. I think that's one of the reasons there's such an interest online in old soap clips, even though people already know most of what is to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't mind them with ATWT right now. I think of them as little promotional vehicles that remind me which days to watch. This week, zap2it mentions Reid will be on on Thursday. So I know enough to be sure to watch that day. But I check out enough of each episode on cbs.com to know whether they're going to be on on other days. zap2it very frequently fails to mention whether Luke, Reid, or Noah is going to be on.

I don't want to watch one extra minute watching ATWT otherwise, except perhaps for Bob and Kim. And John, when and if he returns. Also, I loved the idea someone put forth about all the Snyders coming home when Emma has a heart attack. That I would watch. Douglas Marland just should not have died. That's what the problem is.

N.B. They finally added Eric Sheffer Stevens to the ATWT cast list on zap2it. But they didn't bother to alphabetize it, and just stuck it at the end. http://tvlistings.zap2it.com/tv/as-the-world-turns/EP00000412

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Really? Oh, thank you! :)

I've said this many times before, but I almost always knew what would happen next in any given storyline on any given show. Not because I was clairvoyant, lol, but b/c to me, the hallmark of good storytelling is that you understand characters' histories and motivations thoroughly enough to almost predict how they would respond to circumstances. As far as soaps are concerned, therefore, the question is not what will happen next, but when it will happen, and what will be explored in the meantime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I meant Mimi Torchin, she used to sign her little "Letter From the Editor" on one of the first pages. I had serious OLTL Lord saga on the brain back then and it always tricked my eye.

But SO not mad at you for having that script on hand. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Marland was long gone by this point.  He quit in either August/September 1982. I think it was due to letting the actress play out her contract and use her for party scenes and/or scenes with Phillip/Justin.   I was surprised she was still on in June 1983 myself, because I figured she had been written out before Pam Long joined the writing staff. Thankfully, having episodes uploaded during this period on Spauldingfield YT site has helped to connect some of the dots.  It looks as though Pam Long starts the first week or so of May 1983.. and in those first few weeks: Morgan and Evie were both written off and Lillian/Mindy/Billy/Beth/Annabelle all come onto the show.    
    • @MaximThis really  old song popped into my head this morning .... 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • For any military veterans and family: Military discount for *NEW* subscribers for any type of ParamountPlus subscription, "for the life of the subscription" (whatever that means). Includes: active duty, retirees, reservists and National Guard, veterans, dependents and spouses. Military veterans will receive 50% off new subscriptions (They have a verification process) https://help.paramountplus.com/s/article/Does-Paramount-offer-Military-discounts For existing subscribers, who would be eligible but haven't used the discount: (from the same paramount help link) Question: I’m an existing ParamountPlus subscriber in the military. How do I get the discount? Answer: To take advantage of the military discount offer*, you’ll first need to cancel your existing subscription, then re-subscribe to Paramount+ [at the verification link] on your desktop or mobile browser. During the signup process, your credentials will be verified to confirm your current status. Once you've been verified, your discount will be applied in the next billing cycle.
    • What a lovely gif!!!!!! @Maxim

      Please register in order to view this content

        @Maxim  
    • I didn’t find it that interesting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I can't watch until later (Canada issues). What is Philip's motivation for stealing the drug? Only plot I cared about today and you did not mention it 
    • Doug III’s first day of work. Hope he does a good job… or that Tate tries to sabotage him somehow

      Please register in order to view this content

      His scenes with Holly were nice though. They’re sweet together and I understand why some people think that they have more chemistry than Tate/Holly do. And I liked that Doug III opened up to her about his past. Maybe that could lead to something good happening in the future.  I also enjoyed Roman and Kate, and how they’re both being tied into EJ’s shooting. The mystery of it all is really compelling. I don’t think Roman is the shooter though either.  I didn’t have much sympathy for Kristen though. She has no one to blame for Rachel’s problems than herself. But at the same time, I’m really surprised that Days actually remembered the Alex/Kristen fling. I thought Ron had erased that from existence. I’m not shipping them at all, but I’m definitely shipping a permanent end to Brady/Kristen but after today, I’m not so sure about that either.  And, Johnny and Chanel were still great together
    • https://parade.com/news/beyond-the-gates-actor-flexes-like-a-wrestler-in-viral-shirtless-photo
    • Some country club revelation thoughts from a casual watcher no one asked for. The Great: Daphnee Duplaix gave the best performance we've seen yet. Nicole's dialogue was also well thought out and felt character specific. TJ Maxx Ted was also pretty good. Trisha Mann-Grant steals every scene she's in. Often without even trying. Carrying multiple episodes worth of exposition heavy soap dialogue with starts and stops and recapping and drama and humor is no small feat and she nailed. Vernon telling Lesliana to STFU.  The Bad: So much of the dialogue for the rest of the cast was overly written. Martin said "You are a vile human being with a hole in your heart!". Marty, what are we doing? It's SO dramatic and sounds so silly coming from this grown man. Do Bill and Hayley do anything but talk about the Duprees? And the nerve of her to get so excited to find out Ted is a cheater when she and her husband are too. There should be a hint of shame mixed in with your glee, ma'am. The Questionable: Coffee and a rendition of Amazing Grace after finding out Nicole was betrayed by her husband. The Duprees are an odd bunch. The stinger of one segment had Anita prepared to lambast Lesliana, when we came back someone else was talking. When Anita eventually said something to Wig, it was a lukewarm at best. And then of course she thought singing a song about something that should absolutely not be extended to her son-in-law. The entire family allowing this deranged woman to speech at them in their own was...nuts. I know she said something about what would the neighbors say but my GOD. Is she just going to be allowed to trespass whenever she feels like it now? The focus on Leslie and her wig usage as an oddity is...odd. I think Chelsea said something like "and she wears wigs!" (while wearing a buss down middle part). Okay? It's just not that odd for a black woman to change up her hair. It's the different names that's the problem. I know it's meant to be humorous, in a throwback soap kind of way, but it fell flat for me.  I'm sorry I find the whole family to be WEIRD. It's like they want us to see them as ruthless yet benevolent, open yet furtive, snobbish yet tooth achingly sweet all at the same time. I cannot get a lock on the family dynamics. Everyone is just there.  I'm gonna cry if this show doesn't start giving us ages (or close to it!) for these characters. Because if Eva is 21-22 then Martin was being given crayons, a soda pop and blinders when he was 15-17 years old. Martin had to have been under 8 for me to buy this story, which would make Eva and Kat late 20s (Martin is at least 35 since he wants to run for president), which I don't think they're meant to be. It's honestly minor but it bothers me. I've mentioned this to @Vee but I think the optics on opening the show with both sisters discovering their husbands of over 30 years are cheaters should've been considered. I doubt there was any intention behind it, no one's rubbing their hands together as they scheme to say the married black men can't stay loyal but how does it look? Maybe it's just me. Honestly it's probably just me!
    • Thank you very much!!!! I really appreciate it!!! I also have read the GH coffee table book from the 90s!!!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy