Jump to content

OLTL: Discussion for the week May 31


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

TSJ is good at playing this L&O-type stuff. Like Chris Meloni, he's believable in that type of role as well as the sexually predatory creep. Is there a future for Todd as the chief of police, the mayor of Llanview, PA? :rolleyes: Don't front like I'm talking crazy talk, you know this show like I do. :P

Hannah: You gonna torture me?

Todd: I bet that turns you on.

Ya got that right! [/@Victor.Newman] "Spit in my face and put that bag back over my head! :ph34r: " This girl is macadamias.

Of COURSE Rachel can't make it. :rolleyes::(

Someone needs to make a OLTL soundboard with things like Natalie's sex moan, Cole's "Hepushmuhmomdownastairse!!", Viki's "a-tawl"...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know what. This is about the new bumpers.

I'm still really wondering why Todd, Blair, Tea, Rex, Viki, and Dorian do not have one while Ford does. :mad:

Seems like most of the bumpers are the younger characters (except for a few of them being for couples like John and Nat, Bo and Nora, and Cris and Layla) It kind of disappoints me.

Still, out of all of them. The only characters over 40 used in the bumpers are Bo and Nora. It's ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And Brody doesn't either. <_<:lol:

But yeah I am really shocked that Rex and Gigi don't have one yet. :lol:

Cole and Langston don't have one either. Which, is odd since their respective 'Partners' do.

It just seems like it was really selective. And, they have been using the same ones like almost every day. They need more of them.

They also need an opening update, like yesterday. So, does AMC. GH just updated theirs. It's pathetic when a soap like GH that didn't bother updating for 2 years are now doing it regularly. And, the other two are just slipping off the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And Brody doesn't either. dry.giflaugh.gif

But yeah I am really shocked that Rex and Gigi don't have one yet. laugh.gif

And there are actually two for John....the second one starts with a pic. of the Angel Square status, and then John pointing his gun into the distance with the sound of a shot being fired.

The other John bumper show a Llanview sewer manhole cover, sounds of police sirens, and the word "McBain" next to his pic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They also need an opening update, like yesterday. So, does AMC. GH just updated theirs. It's pathetic when a soap like GH that didn't bother updating for 2 years are now doing it regularly. And, the other two are just slipping off the ball.

I was thinking the same thing!

Stacy died in February and her ass is STILL in the opening credits.

David Gregory (Ford) said he filmed his, so hopefully they are coming soon, with some new shots for others as well.

Ugh. I just realized Kelly will be in the next updates. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I imagine Brody's would look a lot like Bo's just different uniform. And Bo's would have looked a lot like John's had they not gone in the military direction. I don't think we'd be too offended if they doubled up a little. OF COURSE they deserve their own, but I think the whole of an awesome Viki vs. Dorian bumper would be greater than the sum of its parts (did I say that right?).

Ford's is the most cheesetastic and please forgive me if I offend with this tacky term but when he smiles into the camera he has what they call the... rhymes with spray mace. :ph34r:

Cole sounds like he's sucking on a Werther's Original when he talks. I actually like Cole, he doesn't bother me too much he just has some little quirks that I like to poke fun at. I tend to be more annoyed with Starr when she takes up for her dad, though I totally get that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Recent Posts

    • I'm not willing to go that far... yet. China is drastic in the way they deal with dissidents but they're not Russia...yet. China has been known to 'disappear' people who they feel are interfering with the way they run their government business but not usually such high profile individuals (and usually not famous women, who they consider their flowers). Also, unlike Russia, China only seems to take the most extreme measures when some serious criminal charge is made (like the man who was charged with tainting the milk supply, who was executed). Ai Wei Wei is a dissident artists who makes dissident art that is openly critical of Chinese politics and government and he is treated as a hostile force, but even by his own admission he is deliberately provocative, as he believes agit-art is the best way that he can try to get the attention of people who would force change. China is not really in the business of disappearing people like Russia does. At least, not permanently. Jack Ma is one example of someone who went missing for weeks, if not months, then suddenly turned up on his yacht out in the middle of somewhere. You've heard of "Too Big to Fail"? Well, Ma was too big/famous to disappear. With her level of notoriety, I think it would be next to impossible to just do away with her, she's not poor anonymous "Tank Man" in Tiananmen Square. She is Han Chinese woman whose notoriety has only been growing, she's not the unfortunate Uyghurs who are often locked away for months in "re-education" camps, but I suspect that the government will try to 're-program' her mind to forget her allegations, likely under pressure if not all out threats made to her and her family. If she emerges publicly, if not living in anonymity, there will likely be every effort to have her appear timid and cowed in public, much the way she appears now, with broad forced smiles, in front of a menagerie of plush toys.
    • Tubi has some great stuff and I'm currently watching the He-Man She-Ra Christmas Special from 1985 
    • I recently came across the 1997 book Worlds Without End: The Art and History of the Soap Opera. In the book Bill Bell comments on two pivotal events in Y&R history. I hope nobody minds that I quoted his comments in full. On Taking Y&R to One Hour "Once assured that Y&R was a runaway hit, CBS inevitably wanted to talk to me about an hour. I'll spare you the gruesome details, but after months of enormous pressure from the network and the affiliates, I somehow found myself committed to doing the hour show. What ultimately happened is that our ratings went down and it took us three years to become number one again.   How could this have happened? One reason is that when we went to an hour, we had a number of cast defections. The issue of performing in a one-hour show had not been part of their contracts. And some of our leading actors understandably felt that their popularity on Restless would open the door to fame and fortune in nighttime or films. Obviously we had to recast prime characters in our two core families, the Brooks and the Fosters. It was then that I decided if even one more actor from these families decided to leave the show, I'd have to do something radical.   A short time later, Jaime Lyn Bauer, who played Lauralee Brooks and was one of the very few original cast members remaining, came to me and said she was physically exhausted, which she was, and that she wasn't going to renew her contract when it was up in August. This was February.   There was no other answer. I had to replace what had been the core of our show since its inception. Two complete families. About eleven actors in all. But replace them with what?   As I studied the remaining cast, I realized I had two characters - Paul Williams, played by Doug Davidson, and Jack Abbott, played by Terry Lester - both of whom had a relatively insignificant presence on the show. They didn't have families. Hell, they didn't even have bedrooms. But these became the two characters I would build our two new families around. I remember the head of daytime for CBS advising me "with the strongest possible conviction" that I was making a grave mistake by replacing these families. There was a great risk, no question, but my conviction was that it could be even more disastrous if I didn't.   I immediately began establishing new families while interweaving the old. We made this transformation without losing so much as a share point. In fact, our ratings and share points kept building, with our two new families emerging as the dominant characters on the show.   This is where Victor Newman came into the picture."   On Victor Newman "You are not going to believe this, but this character, who today is daytime's number one romantic lead, was to be a short-term noncontract role. It would last between eight to twelve weeks, at which time he was to be shot by his beautiful wife. In short, Victor Newman was in concept a despicable, contemptible, unfaithful wife abuser.   When I saw Eric Braeden's first performance - the voice, the power, the inner strength - I knew immediately that I didn't want to lose this man. He was exactly what the show needed. Not the hateful man we saw on-screen, but the man he could and would become over time.   The first thing was to get Eric under contract, but he didn't want to go under contract. He was very uneasy about television, the daytime serial, the people he worked with, the producers. This was a whole other world for Eric. And Eric is a cautious man.   Over time, Eric became more comfortable with the medium, and more trusting with the producers, and agreed to sign a contract. If memory serves, it was for six months. I immediately changed my story in the hope of salvaging this character.  The rest is history."
    • @JaneAusten the way and in the form most current media exist today is the reason why I have to read multiple sources every week, if I want even half the story.  Some days I can't even stomach much other than to read the headline the the lede. I can remember years ago when I would consume the news like it was my job because to be able to write, I felt like being well read was a must. To some extent, I still feel this way but I am far more circumspect about every single news source- I pretty much treat them all as if tabloid tendencies lurk beneath the surface.    
    • I don't disagree it's a waste of JKJ and honestly all the actors involved, but Phillip has been a villian in the past.  This plan is ludicrous, but it's not like he's been a straight edge good guy all along.  JKJ is playing it like he is a psycho though.
  • On Soap Opera Network

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy